How our Founding Fathers actually defined Americans:"Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people--a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs" -- John Jay, Federalist #2https://t.co/igfS24Zosw"The name of American, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any ...

In her first Ask Me Anything, @amandaaskell answers your philosophical questions about AI, discussing morality, identity, consciousness, and more.Timestamps:0:00 Introduction0:29 Why is there a philosopher at an AI company?1:24 Are philosophers taking AI seriously?3:00 Philosophy ideals vs. engineering realities5:00 Do models make superhumanly moral decisions?6:24 Why Opus 3 felt special9:00 Will models worry about deprecation?13:24 Where does a model’s identity live?15:33 Views on model welfare17:17 Addres ...

RT VB Knives (@Empty_America)Traditional morality assumes that humans are fairly wicked by nature, but can resist this and do the right thing.Neo-morality assumes that humans are essentially good by nature, and naturally don't even want to violate the neo-morality, unless "weird" or "sick." ...

The Trump administration's extreme immigration crackdown has often led to aggressive tactics, including against people simply trying to exercise their constitutional right to protest. This happened on Friday. Reuters reported that Reverend Michael Wolf of the Lake Street Church of Evston outside of Chicago was shoved to the ground by Illinois State Police.Wol was among 21 people detained outside an ICE facility in Broadview, Illinois. And Wolfe says it wasn't the first time he was targeted. At another prote ...

RT Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal)SPINOZA: YOU DON'T NEED A GOD TO DO GOODBaruch Spinoza, the 17th-century heretic philosopher excommunicated from Judaism for thinking too freely, didn’t believe in a personal God who judges us. He didn’t believe in heaven, hell, or miracles.And yet, Spinoza believed in an absolute morality.How? Because for Spinoza, God wasn’t some sky-bound accountant tracking sin. God was nature itself - Deus sive Natura. The universe wasn’t cold or indifferent; it was divine.In this system, e ...

Right now, the FBI is trying to track down the shooter who killed conservative activist Charlie Kirk. While authorities in Utah work to uncover a motive, they are calling this a targeted attack. An attack against a prominent political figure on an American college campus.This heinous attack comes against the backdrop of a nation, folks, that's reeling from a spike in political violence. In a new column for uh MSNBC. com, Simone writes, quote, "Democracy cannot function under fear. The constitutional promise ...

Core Argument - Stories act as a mirror, reflecting our moral judgment processes and revealing insights about ourselves [35][36] - Character morality is a significant predictor of story and character liking [12][13] - Moral judgments are often based on emotional responses rather than careful deliberation [14][15] Moral Foundations Theory - Moral foundations theory posits five domains of morality: care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity [15] - Characters can exhibit varying degrees of these moral foundations, influencing audience perception [16] Character Interdependence - Character liking is often determined by comparing characters within a story, rather than objective morality [22][23] - Antagonists can influence the perceived morality of protagonists, as seen in "Breaking Bad" [24][25][26][27] Real-World Applications - Contextually dependent morality is observed in sports, where rivalries influence moral alignment [28][29][30] - Interpersonal relationships, such as friendships after a breakup, also demonstrate contextually dependent morality [30][31] - Conflicts between liked characters, like in "Captain America: Civil War," force audiences to choose sides based on perceived morality [31][32][33]

Core Argument - The report questions the objective nature of right and wrong, suggesting that morality is subjective and influenced by circumstances [16][17] - It challenges the audience to consider the nuances and "shades of gray" in moral dilemmas rather than adhering to rigid definitions [17] Examples Challenging Societal Norms - Murder: The report presents Julia Tfana, who killed over 600 men, as potentially a hero for helping women escape abusive marriages [6] - Murder: It also mentions Luji Majon, accused of killing the CEO of United Healthcare, arguing it was an action against unfair healthcare practices [7] - Theft: The Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI, who stole classified documents exposing illegal projects, were honored despite their crime [8][11] - Theft: The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum heist, involving $500 million in stolen art, is presented as potentially reclaiming stolen art and disrupting wealth concentration [9][10] - Vandalism and Destruction: The report highlights Banksy's graffiti as a form of social and political commentary, questioning whether it's justified despite being illegal [12][13] - Vandalism and Destruction: It also references the women's suffrage movement's destructive protests as a means to achieve equality [13] Key Considerations - The report emphasizes that events and real-life experiences can alter perceptions of morality and challenge previously established norms [3] - It suggests that questioning established rules is crucial, rather than blindly accepting them [16]

This week, Americans mark 249 years since a group of colonists outraged by a distant government's abuse of power declared their intention to form a new nation. One founded on liberty, equality, and the radical idea at the time that governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed. We celebrate July 4th with fireworks and flags. But the deeper meaning of this day, of this remarkable experiment, is not about triumph. It's about aspiration. The Declaration of Independence certainly did not give ...

Core Argument - Morality is a compass for navigating life, balancing objective truths with adaptability [3][6] - Evil stems from a disconnect from empathy and understanding, thriving in isolation fueled by rigid belief systems [10][11] - Science and spirituality are complementary, with science explaining "how" and spirituality addressing "why" [14][15] - Reconciling individual truths with a collective moral code is essential to overcome chaos and evil [27] Science and Spirituality - Science and religion can work together, as exemplified by the Big Bang theory theorized by a Catholic priest [17][18] - The placebo effect demonstrates the mind-body connection, highlighting the role of belief in healing [21][22] - Belief, whether in religion, medicine, or oneself, can lead to real physiological benefits [25] Truth and Morality - Morality is a living dialogue, not static or absolute, connecting science's understanding with spirituality's search for meaning [29] - Determining right and wrong is multifactorial, influenced by environment, spirituality, and science [30] - The purpose of morality is to illuminate the journey and ensure collective progress despite differences [30]