Investor Cathie Wood, a longtime Tesla bull known for first investing in the company a decade ago at $13 per share, condemned the growing resistance to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s potential $1 trillion pay package. Over the weekend, the ARK Invest CEO suggested the financial system that’s enabling the pushback against it is the one with the problem, not the company that wants to make the world’s richest man richer by such a magnitude. Wood said in a Sunday post on X that it was “sad if not damning” that proxy a ...

Core Viewpoint - ExxonMobil is implementing an auto-voting system for retail shareholders to strengthen its position against climate-focused investor campaigns, allowing individual investors to align their votes with management recommendations unless they opt out [1][2]. Group 1: Auto-Voting System - The auto-voting system is designed for retail investors, who hold approximately 40% of Exxon's stock, and aims to increase participation in proxy voting, which has historically been low [1]. - Fewer than 25% of these retail investors typically cast ballots during proxy seasons, making Exxon vulnerable to activist campaigns [1]. Group 2: Impact on Shareholder Dynamics - Analysts suggest that this new program could significantly alter outcomes at annual meetings, providing management with a stronger base of support against activist proposals [2]. - A governance consultant noted that the auto-voting mechanism would complicate efforts for activists to win votes on their proposals, thereby reinforcing management's position [2]. Group 3: Reactions and Implications - The initiative has faced criticism from shareholder advocates who argue that default voting structures may diminish dissenting voices and weaken the influence of proxy advisors [2]. - Conversely, some view the strategy as an effective defense against disruptive campaigns, potentially transforming a passive retail base into a protective barrier against climate-related shareholder challenges [3].