RT BSCN (@BSCNews)🔶 REVENUE-SHARING ON $CORE DAO: It's a good time to be a developer in the @Coredao_Org ecosystem... Don't miss outhttps://t.co/pj24PLd7Eq ...

RT BSCN (@BSCNews)🔶 REVENUE-SHARING ON $CORE DAO: It's a good time to be a developer in the @Coredao_Org ecosystem... Don't miss outhttps://t.co/pj24PLd7Eq ...

Revenue Sharing - The document mentions a potential revenue sharing agreement [1] - It suggests using the author's referral link for revenue sharing purposes [1] Content Type - The content appears to be a social media post (tweet) with a link [1]

Core DAO Ecosystem - Core DAO 将与社区分享收入 [1] - 现在是加入 Core DAO 生态系统的最佳时机 [1]

Legal Challenge & Settlement Overview - Lawsuits challenge NCAA settlement's revenue distribution, alleging unfair representation of female athletes' value [1][2] - Settlement includes ~$8 billion in back pay for ~400,000 former athletes and revenue sharing for current athletes [2] - Revenue sharing estimated at $20 million annually, allowing athletes to earn from name, image, and likeness [2] Title IX Violation Allegations - Lawsuits claim settlement violates Title IX, federal law barring sex-based discrimination on college campuses [4] - Female athletes allegedly required to waive Title IX rights to receive back pay [4] - Disparity in revenue allocation between men's and women's sports is a key point of contention [3] Revenue Distribution Discrepancies - Men's football and basketball receive over 90% of revenue allocated to men's sports [3] - Top women's sport, basketball, receives only 1.1% of revenue [3] - Payouts for former athletes expected to mirror these disproportionate amounts [4] Athlete Perspectives - Plaintiffs argue male and female athletes invest equal effort, despite differing fan attendance [5] - Athletes advocate for equitable treatment and a larger share of revenue [7][8] - NCAA claims settlement provides significant financial benefits to student-athletes, totaling nearly 50% of athletics department revenue [6]

Legal Challenge & Settlement Overview - A lawsuit challenges the NCAA settlement, which allows direct payments to athletes for NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) use, estimating $20 million in revenue sharing annually [2] - The settlement includes $2.8 billion in back pay for approximately 400,000 former athletes, which is a point of contention in the lawsuit [3] - The judge overseeing the case acknowledged Title IX related arguments but allowed the settlement to proceed as an antitrust case, leaving the door open for future Title IX challenges [11][12] Title IX & Gender Equality Concerns - Plaintiffs argue the revenue distribution underestimates the value female athletes bring to universities and violates Title IX, the federal law barring sex-based discrimination on college campuses [2][4] - Women's basketball, the top-listed women's sport, receives 1.1% of the revenue pie, significantly less than men's football and basketball, which receive over 90% combined [4] - One plaintiff was estimated to receive around $400 in back pay, highlighting the disparity [5] - Female athletes feel they are settling for "scraps" and deserve more, seeking a bigger seat at the table [7] Proposed Funding Formula - Plaintiffs propose a specific formula for broadcast compensation and athlete service compensation, allocating funds based on the ratio of men to women in the athlete pool each year [9][10] - For example, if men comprise 60% of the athlete pool, they would receive 60% of the designated funding, with women receiving the remaining 40% [10] NCAA's Perspective - The NCAA considers the settlement a "massive win" for student-athletes, enabling schools to provide direct financial benefits totaling nearly 50% of athletics department revenue [6]

Core Viewpoint - Perplexity is positioning itself as a competitive player in the AI search engine market, focusing on accuracy and user experience, while seeking significant partnerships with hardware manufacturers to enhance its product deployment and monetization strategies [1][2][8]. Company Overview - Perplexity is an AI search engine startup currently negotiating a $500 million funding round, with a valuation nearing $14 billion [1]. - The company has launched a browser called Comet, which integrates AI capabilities, and has seen significant growth in search queries, reaching approximately 780 million in May, with a month-over-month increase of 20% [1][7]. Product Development - The Comet browser is designed to provide a seamless user experience by combining search and actionable tasks in one interface, aiming to function as a cognitive operating system rather than just another browser [6][5]. - Perplexity's AI assistant is being pre-installed on Motorola and potentially Samsung devices, which is expected to accelerate model training and monetization [1][8][9]. Competitive Landscape - Perplexity claims to offer the most affordable and accurate API in the AI search engine space, surpassing competitors like Google and OpenAI [2]. - The company differentiates itself by focusing on reliable answers and sourcing information, contrasting with traditional search engines that may prioritize ad revenue over accuracy [11][12]. Market Strategy - The company is exploring revenue-sharing models with content creators and publishers, aiming to provide a sustainable income stream while enhancing brand recognition for those cited in its search results [12]. - Perplexity's partnerships with hardware manufacturers are crucial for expanding its market reach and user retention, as the browser serves as a primary entry point for users [4][10]. Future Outlook - With the potential to influence decision-making across various sectors, Perplexity envisions a future where its market capitalization could reach trillions, driven by its unique approach to AI and search accuracy [8].