Welcome back. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are demanding answers as backlash grows over the Trump administration's controversial strikes on alleged drug boats. MS Now has learned that Navy Admiral Frank M.Bradley will be on Capitol Hill this week to speak with members about the operations. The White House and Defense Secretary Pete Hegath now say it was Bradley who ordered a second strike to kill survivors from an initial strike back on September 2nd. And joining us now, Democratic Congressman Jason Crowe of C ...

the reaction that the president has had to service members telling other service members, you don't have to follow an illegal order. And then his reaction is telling himself, look, I I think of my 8-year-old. I will tell him sometimes if I'm working downstairs and he's upstairs, like, I better not find out that you're on YouTube if he finds his way to a screen. If he throws a tantrum or if he loses it, and sometimes he does, I'm like, okay, well, you've been on YouTube.like you just you just told on yoursel ...

Political & Judicial Concerns - The US expresses grave concern over Justice Moraes' actions, viewing them as an attack on the rule of law and political stability in Brazil [1] - Justice Moraes is accused of politicizing the judicial process and bringing Brazil's Supreme Court into disrepute [1] - The incarceration of former President Bolsonaro is seen as provocative and unnecessary, given his existing house arrest and communication limitations [1] - The US warns against judges who have no limits on their power, considering them dangerous to democracy [1]

You were the attorney general, of course, in Pennsylvania when Donald Trump tried to steal a presidential election. Um, he seems even more unleashed now than he was back then, or that's my assessment. How worried are you about what he's going to do, tried to do in 2026.And and how are you preparing for that. >> Look, I'm worried because, to use your word, he he seems more unleashed than he was, you know, four, five, six years ago. And I think what's also concerning is um all the people around him um you kno ...

As promised, joining me now is Pennsylvania's Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro. Governor Shapiro, it's great to see you and and it was a hell of a night for Democrats last night. So, so let me just start you.Go ahead. It was >> No, it was a great it was a great night and it's great to be with you and excited to talk to you tonight. >> Yeah, I'm excited to have you here.So, let me start by asking you about that because I we knew that it was going to be a good night by the polls or that's what we all kind of ...

From @WSJopinion: Leftist extremists are waging war on the rule of law and liberty. Terrorists, gang members and rioters attack federal law-enforcement officers working to reimpose order after chaos under the Biden administration, writes @KristiNoem. https://t.co/U01okhRnd5 ...

Investigation & Legal Stance - Special Counsel Jack Smith offers to testify publicly regarding investigations into Trump's handling of classified documents and efforts to overturn the 2020 election, seeking assurance of no punishment from the DOJ [1] - Smith defends his team's data collection, stating it was narrowly tailored to January 4th-7th, 2021, focusing on telephonic activity surrounding the January 6th riots, aiming to confirm reports of Trump's attempts to influence senators [1] - The investigation is portrayed as a standard procedure to investigate Trump's efforts to prevent the certification of the election [2] - Smith has been increasingly vocal about the Justice Department and the rule of law under Trump, particularly regarding pardons for those involved in the January 6th Capitol attack [3][4] Communication & Public Perception - Smith's offer to testify publicly is seen as a strategic move to counter mischaracterizations and distortions by Republicans [9][10][11] - Smith's shift from silence to public engagement is attributed to the need to defend against accusations of a politicized investigation [11][12] - The discussion highlights the tension between the traditional DOJ approach of silence until trial and the need to inform the public, especially in the context of the January 6th investigation [15][16][17][18][19] - Some argue that federal prosecutors are revisiting the traditional approach and recognizing the need to communicate the story to the public [22] - Jim Jordan's refusal to comply with a subpoena related to January 6th is noted in the context of his criticism of the investigation [22][23]

President Trump's second term is drawing alarm from protests to experts over this drift away from democracy and towards an autocratic slide that can be understood sometimes not so much by looking to our own history but those of other countries from Turkey to Hungary where systems that once used elections and law as a baseline began to bend to autocrats where scenes of troops abroad resonate differently now for many in America as Trump repeatedly deploys soldiers inside our country to US cities that he views ...

As he seeks to smash and grab 230 million bucks, Donald Trump's reckless campaign to wreck the rule of law with his prosecutions is today wobbling a bit like a Jenga tower that got a little too tall. today in two jurisdictions in the Eastern District of Virginia and in New Jersey. Trump's handpicked prosecutors, both with zero experience as prosecutors, but totally down with going after Trump's critics, regardless of the facts in the cases, are both facing challenges to their appointments, to the legality o ...

Allegations of Misconduct within the Justice Department - A former Justice Department attorney, Arez Ruvanei, alleges witnessing government lawyers lying in court and evading judicial orders [1][2] - Ruvanei claims that a high-ranking Justice Department official instructed attorneys to disregard potential court orders related to the expulsion of Venezuelans [9][10] - Ruvanei states he was ordered to falsely accuse a deported individual of being a gang member and terrorist [20] - Law professor Ryan Goodman's analysis indicates over 35 cases where judges accused the Justice Department of providing false information, including false sworn declarations [20][21] Due Process and Legal Principles - The core issue revolves around the denial of due process rights to individuals, regardless of their alleged affiliations [17][18][20] - The principle that everyone deserves their day in court is emphasized as a fundamental aspect of the American legal system [17][18] - Concerns are raised that the Justice Department's actions could set a precedent for arbitrary accusations and deprivation of liberty [20] - The Supreme Court unanimously agreed that the Venezuelan prisoners were entitled to their day in court [27] Repercussions and Responses - Arez Ruvanei was fired after refusing to sign a brief containing false information and subsequently filed a whistleblower disclosure [20] - Amal Boie, a former Justice Department official, denied advising attorneys to violate court orders and dismissed Ruvanei's claims as falsehoods and distortions [24][26]