Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased PubMatic, Inc. securities between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025, due to alleged misleading statements by the company regarding its business operations and revenue impacts from a significant demand side platform buyer [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that PubMatic made false and misleading statements about its business, failing to disclose a shift of clients from a top demand side platform buyer to a new platform, which resulted in reduced ad spend and revenue [5]. - Investors who purchased PubMatic securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors interested in joining the class action can do so by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by October 20, 2025, to represent the class in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CTO Realty Growth, Inc. for misleading statements regarding the sustainability of its dividends and financial practices during the Class Period from February 18, 2021, to June 24, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that CTO Realty Growth made false and misleading statements about the sustainability of its dividends and used deceptive practices to inflate its Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO) [5]. - It is alleged that the company's financial prospects were overstated, leading to investor damages when the true information was revealed [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased CTO Realty securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including over $438 million for investors in 2019 [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements and has consistently ranked among the top firms in this area since 2013 [4].

NEW YORK, Aug. 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into The J.M. Smucker Company (NYSE: SJM) for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in J.M. Smucker, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/the-jm-smucker-company-class-action-lawsuit. Why Is J.M. Smucker being Investigated? J.M. Smucker manufactures and markets branded food and beverage products. I ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. regarding misleading information in their registration statement related to their October 2024 initial public offering [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that the registration statement was false and/or misleading, failing to disclose incidents of child abuse, neglect, and harm at KinderCare facilities [5]. - It alleges that KinderCare did not provide the "highest quality care possible" and failed to meet basic standards in the child care industry, exposing the company to undisclosed risks of lawsuits and reputational damage [5]. - Investors are encouraged to join the class action lawsuit, with no out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has a history of significant recoveries for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Investors can join the class action by submitting a form or contacting the firm directly for more information [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Charter Communications, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and the impact of the Affordable Connectivity Program cancellation on its performance [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Charter - The lawsuit claims that Charter failed to disclose the significant impact of the cancellation of the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) on its Internet customer base and revenue [2]. - It is alleged that Charter's operational strategies were inadequate to mitigate the adverse effects of the ACP ending, leading to greater risks to business plans and earnings growth than previously reported [2]. - The complaint asserts that Charter's positive statements about its business and growth prospects were misleading and lacked a reasonable basis throughout the class period [2]. Group 2: Class Action Process - Investors in Charter have until October 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action, which involves representing the interests of all class members [3]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial interest in the case and is responsible for directing the litigation [3]. - Participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery from the lawsuit [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Information - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is the law firm handling the class action and has a reputation for prosecuting class actions and recovering significant amounts for victims of corporate misconduct [4]. - The firm encourages Charter investors who have experienced losses to contact them for more information regarding the lawsuit [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased PubMatic, Inc. securities between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025, due to alleged misleading statements by the company regarding its business operations and revenue impacts from a significant demand side platform buyer [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that PubMatic made false and misleading statements, failing to disclose a shift of clients from a top demand side platform buyer to a new platform, which negatively impacted PubMatic's ad spend and revenue [5]. - Investors who purchased PubMatic securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by October 20, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Many attorneys at Rosen Law Firm have received recognition from Lawdragon and Super Lawyers, highlighting the firm's expertise in this area [4].

Core Viewpoint - J.M. Smucker Company is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws following significant impairment charges related to its Sweet Baked Snacks segment and the Hostess brand trademark, which have led to a substantial decline in stock price [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - J.M. Smucker manufactures and markets branded food and beverage products, including the recently acquired Hostess Brands, Inc., which specializes in sweet baked goods [2]. - The company previously claimed that the Hostess acquisition was "highly complementary" and that trends in sweet snacking were favorable [2]. Group 2: Financial Performance - In Q4 2025, J.M. Smucker reported an $867 million impairment charge related to the goodwill of its Sweet Baked Snacks segment and a $113 million impairment charge for the Hostess brand trademark due to underperformance [3]. - Following the announcement of these impairment charges, J.M. Smucker's stock price fell by $17.44 per share, or over 18%, from $111.85 on June 9, 2025, to $94.41 on June 10, 2025 [3].

Core Viewpoint - BellRing Brands, Inc. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws, with concerns regarding the sustainability of its sales growth driven by temporary trade inventory loading rather than genuine consumer demand [1][2]. Group 1: Company Overview - BellRing Brands operates in the convenient nutrition category, primarily known for its brands Premier Protein and Dymatize, which offer ready-to-drink protein shakes and powders [2]. - The company reported that Premier Protein achieved an all-time high in household penetration and strong demand across all channels, attributed to distribution expansion and promotional activities [2]. Group 2: Sales Growth Concerns - The sales growth during the relevant period may not be sustainable, as it could have been influenced by temporary trade inventory loading at key retailers [2]. - On May 5, 2025, BellRing disclosed that several key retailers reduced their weeks of supply, which would negatively impact growth in Q3 2025 [3]. Group 3: Stock Performance - Following the May 5 announcement, BellRing's stock price dropped by $13.96, or over 18%, from $77.34 to $63.38 per share [3]. - On August 4, 2025, the company reported disappointing quarterly consumption of Premier Protein RTD Shakes, leading to a further decline in stock price by $17.46, or nearly 33%, from $53.64 to $36.18 per share [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Lineage, Inc. related to its July 2024 IPO, alleging that the registration statement was misleading and failed to disclose critical information about the company's financial health and market conditions [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Lineage was experiencing a decline in customer demand due to increased cold-storage supply and destocking of excessive inventory from the COVID-19 pandemic [5]. - It is alleged that Lineage implemented unsustainable price increases prior to the IPO, which could not be maintained in the face of weakening demand [5]. - The lawsuit states that Lineage was unable to counteract adverse trends through operational efficiencies or competitive advantages, leading to stagnant or falling revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices [5]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased Lineage common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, investors can visit the provided link or contact the law firm for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by September 30, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - A lawsuit has been filed against Lineage, Inc. and its senior executives for potential violations of federal securities laws, particularly related to misleading statements made during its IPO [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, with claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 for investors who purchased stock during the IPO on July 25, 2024 [2]. - Investors have until September 30, 2025, to request to lead the case [2]. Group 2: Company Background - Lineage, Inc. operates as a cold storage-focused real estate investment trust (REIT), owning and managing temperature-controlled storage facilities for perishable products [3]. Group 3: Allegations and Financial Performance - The IPO documents claimed that Lineage had "consistent cold chain demand" and strong cash flows, suggesting resilience during economic stress, while in reality, the company was experiencing a downturn due to customers destocking excess inventory from the COVID-19 pandemic [4]. - Following the IPO, Lineage's stock price fell from an initial $78 per share to approximately $40 per share, indicating a significant decline in market value [5].