NEW YORK, March 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE) between November 5, 2025 and February 26, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important May 5, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Eos Energy securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Plug Power Inc. securities between January 17, 2025, and November 13, 2025, of the April 3, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Plug Power securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [2] - The deadline to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff is April 3, 2026, with the lead plaintiff acting on behalf of other class members [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the likelihood of funds from the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan becoming available to Plug Power [4] - It is claimed that Plug Power was likely to pivot towards less ambitious projects, which would have less commercial upside [4] - The public statements made by Plug Power were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true details emerged [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased SDM securities between May 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 16, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - Smart Digital is described as a provider of digital marketing services, and the lawsuit alleges that the company made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant risks related to market manipulation and fraudulent trading [5]. - The lawsuit claims that insiders used offshore accounts to facilitate share dumping during a price inflation campaign, and that Smart Digital's public statements omitted risks of fraudulent trading, leading to investor damages when the truth emerged [5].

Core Viewpoint - Hagens Berman is notifying investors about a pending securities class action against Coupang, Inc. regarding alleged misrepresentation of cybersecurity protocols and a significant data breach affecting customer information [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lead plaintiff deadline for the class action lawsuit is set for February 17, 2026 [3]. - The expanded class period for affected investors is from May 7, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [3]. - The key allegation involves delayed disclosure of a cybersecurity breach detected on November 18, 2025 [3][4]. Group 2: Allegations and Breach Details - The lawsuit claims that Coupang misled investors by assuring them of adequate cybersecurity measures while failing to disclose a breach that allowed unauthorized access to sensitive customer data [2][4]. - On November 29, 2025, Coupang revealed that its internal systems were compromised, affecting approximately 33.7 million customer accounts in Korea [7]. - The breach is believed to have started on June 24, 2025, via overseas servers [7]. Group 3: Executive Changes and Regulatory Actions - Coupang's CEO, Park Dae-joon, resigned on December 10, 2025, in connection with the data leak incident, and Harold Rogers was appointed as interim CEO [7]. - On December 16, 2025, Coupang acknowledged awareness of the cybersecurity incident on November 18, 2025, prior to public disclosure [7]. - Korean regulators have initiated investigations into the breach, and Coupang is cooperating fully [7]. Group 4: Compensation and Future Actions - Following the breach, Coupang announced a compensation plan of 1.685 trillion won (over $1 billion) to restore customer trust [7]. - Reports suggest that the breach may have involved authentication keys that were valid for an extended period, raising questions about the adequacy of Coupang's cybersecurity protocols [8].

Core Viewpoint - Hagens Berman is notifying investors about a pending securities class action against Coupang, Inc. regarding alleged misleading statements about its cybersecurity protocols and a significant data breach affecting customer information [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lead plaintiff deadline for the class action lawsuit is set for February 17, 2026 [5]. - The class period for the lawsuit covers transactions from May 7, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [5]. - The key allegation involves delayed disclosure of a cybersecurity breach detected on November 18, 2025 [5]. Group 2: Allegations and Breach Details - The lawsuit claims that Coupang misrepresented the effectiveness of its cybersecurity measures and concealed a breach that allowed unauthorized access to sensitive customer data [2][6]. - The breach reportedly involved access to approximately 33.7 million customer accounts in Korea, with unauthorized access believed to have begun on June 24, 2025 [9]. - Coupang's CEO resigned on December 10, 2025, in connection with the data leak incident, and the company appointed an interim CEO [9]. Group 3: Regulatory and Financial Implications - Coupang acknowledged awareness of the cybersecurity incident on November 18, 2025, but did not disclose it publicly until December 16, 2025 [9]. - Following the breach, Coupang announced a compensation plan of 1.685 trillion won (over $1 billion) to restore customer trust [9]. - Korean regulators have initiated investigations into the incident, and Coupang is cooperating fully [9].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Integer Holdings Corporation common stock about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to alleged misleading statements made by the company during the specified class period [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from July 25, 2024, to October 22, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors who purchased Integer common stock during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 9, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Integer Holdings - The lawsuit alleges that Integer made materially false and misleading statements regarding its competitive position in the electrophysiology manufacturing market [5]. - It is claimed that Integer overstated its visibility into customer demand while experiencing a deterioration in sales for two of its electrophysiology devices [5]. - The company mischaracterized its electrophysiology devices as long-term growth drivers for its cardio and vascular segment, leading to misleading positive statements about its business and operations [5].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws, particularly concerning misleading statements about the company's Long Island City property and its leasing value [4][6]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The firm is encouraging investors who suffered losses in Alexandria between January 27, 2025, and October 27, 2025, to discuss their legal options [1]. - A federal securities class action has been filed against Alexandria, with a deadline of January 26, 2026, for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff [4][8]. - The complaint alleges that Alexandria and its executives made false and misleading statements while concealing material adverse facts about the company's property [6]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Alexandria reported third-quarter earnings on October 27, 2025, which fell short of analyst expectations, with a 5% decline in revenue and a 7% decline in adjusted funds from operation [7]. - The average occupancy rate for Alexandria declined from 94.8% in the previous year to 91.4% [7]. - Following the disappointing financial results, Alexandria's stock price dropped over 19% on October 28, 2025 [7].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Stride, Inc. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Stride securities between October 22, 2024, and October 28, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 12, 2026 [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has consistently ranked in the top 4 for securities class action settlements since 2013 and recovered over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Stride made misleading statements about its products and services, inflating enrollment numbers and cutting staff costs beyond statutory limits, which led to damages for investors when the truth was revealed [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating allegations that Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. misled investors regarding its business operations and growth potential for the fiscal year 2025 [2][3]. Group 1: Allegations and Misleading Information - The lawsuit claims that Sprouts' management provided overly positive statements about the company's growth potential while concealing material adverse facts [3]. - Defendants expressed confidence in Sprouts' customer base remaining resilient to macroeconomic pressures, suggesting that the company would benefit from a cautious consumer environment [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that the true state of Sprouts' growth potential was misrepresented, leading to significant sales growth slowdown that was not disclosed to investors [3]. Group 2: Class Action Participation - Investors who purchased securities or sold put options of Sprouts between June 4, 2025, and October 29, 2025, may be eligible to participate in the class action [1][4]. - Shareholders wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file motions with the court by January 26, 2026 [4]. - Investors can choose to remain absent class members and still be eligible for recovery without participating in the case [4]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Role - Rosen Law Firm is recognized for its commitment to shareholder rights litigation and has recovered over $1 billion for shareholders since its inception [6]. - The firm operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders incur no fees or expenses unless a recovery is achieved [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of StubHub Holdings, Inc. common stock about the January 23, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline related to a class action lawsuit following the company's September 2025 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased StubHub common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by January 23, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement was materially false and misleading, omitting critical information about changes in payment timing to vendors and their adverse impact on StubHub's free cash flow [5]. - It is claimed that these omissions led to materially misleading statements regarding StubHub's business and operations, resulting in investor damages when the true information became public [5].