All right, let's get to a mad dash for this Wednesday. Something we used to call hump day. Of course, we got about what, 7 minutes or so before we get to an opening bell.We've talked a lot about the ambitions of Ollo. Yes. >> Uh, which is the subject of an FT story this morning as well.>> Devastating. >> Why. >> Why.Because it basically says it's a 20 billion nuclear startup without any revenue. And I think it is being Sam Alman's involved. We we've known that Bobby's a backer uh and the president likes it. ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and skepticism surrounding Ollo, a nuclear startup valued at $20 billion but currently without revenue, highlighting concerns about its viability and scalability in the nuclear power sector [1][4][5]. Group 1: Company Analysis - Ollo is described as a nuclear startup with significant backing, including involvement from notable figures, yet it faces criticism for lacking revenue and realistic operational timelines [1][4]. - The company has seen a dramatic stock price increase of 500%, but there are concerns about its short interest of approximately 13% [4]. - The potential for Ollo to achieve non-commercial operations in the next six to seven years is mentioned, but doubts remain about its ability to scale effectively [4][5]. Group 2: Industry Context - GE Vernova is identified as a leading player in the nuclear power industry, emphasizing that many claims about new nuclear technologies may be overly optimistic, with operational timelines pushed to the late 2020s or beyond [2][5]. - The discussion highlights the importance of scale in nuclear power, with references to established projects like Diablo, contrasting them with Ollo's current capabilities [5]. - The sentiment in the industry suggests a cautious approach to investing in companies without revenue, with a recommendation to sell stocks of firms that are not yet commercially viable [6][7].