Key Takeaways Research from the New York Fed shows Americans, not foreigners, are bearing the cost of tariffs.The Trump administration criticized the study, calling it partisan and questioning its methodology.The conflict highlights ongoing tensions over the Federal Reserve's independence from political influence. Get personalized, AI-powered answers built on 27+ years of trusted expertise. The latest battleground in the feud between the White House and the Federal Reserve system is a routine economi ...

Company Overview - McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is based in Hunt Valley, Maryland, and specializes in manufacturing, selling, and distributing spices, seasoning mixes, condiments, and other flavorful products, with a market cap of $18.5 billion [1] Stock Performance - MKC shares have underperformed the broader market over the past year, declining 8.6% compared to a 14.4% increase in the S&P 500 Index. However, in 2026, MKC stock has risen 3.6%, outperforming the S&P 500's 1.4% increase year-to-date [2] - Compared to the First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG), which gained about 6% over the past year and 12.8% year-to-date, MKC's performance has been weaker [3] Financial Performance - MKC's performance has been affected by unexpected commodity inflation and tariff costs, which have offset efficiency gains. Despite growth in both consumer and flavor solutions segments, gross margins have been squeezed [6] - The company reported Q4 results with an adjusted EPS of $0.86, missing Wall Street expectations of $0.87, and revenue of $1.85 billion, falling short of forecasts of $1.86 billion. MKC expects full-year adjusted EPS in the range of $3.05 to $3.13 [7] - For fiscal 2026, analysts expect MKC's EPS to grow 3.3% to $3.10 on a diluted basis. The company's earnings surprise history is mixed, beating consensus estimates in two of the last four quarters while missing forecasts in two others [8] Management Insights - CEO Brendan Foley noted resilient consumer demand and innovation-driven sales growth but acknowledged that ongoing inflationary pressures and ERP costs will constrain profitability. The company anticipates continued volume growth through new products and distribution, although profitability will be impacted by costs and investments [6]

Core Insights - Polaris faced significant tariff-related cost pressures, amounting to $37 million in Q4, which impacted adjusted gross margin and led to modest adjusted EPS of approximately $0.08 [1][6] - The company reported a 9% increase in adjusted sales and North American retail sales, excluding youth products, indicating a focus on more profitable segments [2][6] - Polaris anticipates a challenging 2026, with total sales growth projected at 1-3%, and adjusted EPS expected to be between $1.50 and $1.60, while facing a tariff headwind of approximately $90 million [5][22] Financial Performance - In FY2025, Polaris generated roughly $605 million in free cash flow and paid down about $530 million of debt, but expects lower free cash flow of around $120 million in 2026 [4][16] - The company achieved adjusted EBITDA margin expansion of 80-120 basis points year-over-year, despite the impact of tariffs [19] - Polaris expects operating cash flow of about $160 million in 2026, with the first half of the year anticipated to be challenging for covenant compliance due to tariff pressures [16][17] Operational Highlights - Polaris gained market share across all segments in 2025, including off-road vehicles and motorcycles, with strong retail trends in utility vehicles [3][7] - The company reported a healthy dealer inventory level, with "just under 100 days" across the network, and a 9% decrease in off-road vehicle dealer inventory [12] - Significant operational improvements led to over $60 million in savings in 2025, with a $25 million reduction in warranty expenses due to quality enhancements [13][15] Strategic Outlook - Polaris is in the final stages of shifting youth manufacturing from China to Mexico, which is expected to improve dealer inventory levels by 2026 [2] - The company plans to reduce its reliance on China-based materials from approximately 14% at the end of 2025 to below 5% by the end of 2027 [23] - Transition service agreements related to the Indian Motorcycle separation are expected to generate $30 million to $35 million in other income in 2026 [20]

Core Insights - The Brand House Collective reported a net sales decline to $103.5 million in Q3 2025 from $114.4 million in the same quarter last year, while narrowing losses significantly [1] - The company experienced a 7.4% drop in consolidated comparable sales and a 6% reduction in store numbers [1] Financial Performance - Gross profit decreased to $21.1 million, representing 20.4% of net sales, down from $32.1 million or 28.1% in Q3 2024, primarily due to weaker merchandise margins and fixed store occupancy costs [2] - The adjusted net loss widened to $13.6 million, or $0.61 per diluted share, compared to an adjusted net loss of $3.8 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, a year earlier [3] - Adjusted EBITDA moved to a loss of $9.9 million, contrasting with an adjusted EBITDA income of $0.5 million in the same period of 2024 [3] Operating Expenses and Cost Management - Operating expenses totaled $23.1 million, representing 22.3% of net sales, down from $34.5 million or 30.2% of net sales a year earlier, attributed to lower marketing expenditure and reduced self-insured employee benefit costs [3][4] - A $10.0 million gain from the sale of the Kirkland's brand to Beyond contributed to the reduction in operating expenses [4] Store Operations and Inventory - The company closed three Kirkland's Home stores and converted three into Bed Bath & Beyond Home stores, ending the period with 303 Kirkland's Home stores and three Bed Bath & Beyond Home stores [4] - Inventory decreased to $88.9 million as of November 1, 2025, down from $111.2 million a year earlier [4] Cash and Debt Position - Cash amounted to $6.5 million, with outstanding debt of $61.6 million and $5.8 million in letters of credit under the senior secured revolving credit facility [5] - The Brand House Collective operates over 300 stores across 35 US states and manages a portfolio of home and family brands through its e-commerce operations [5]

Core Insights - The competitive landscape between Procter & Gamble (PG) and Church & Dwight (CHD) highlights contrasting business models, with PG being a market leader and CHD as a value-driven challenger [1][2] Procter & Gamble (PG) - PG has achieved its 40th consecutive quarter of organic sales growth, with Q1 fiscal 2026 revenues reaching $22.39 billion, reflecting its dominance in the consumer products sector [3] - The company’s portfolio includes 10 daily-use categories, with eight showing growth or stability in organic sales, driven by strong brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette [4] - PG's management is focusing on an integrated superiority strategy, enhancing product performance and innovation, as seen in significant upgrades to Tide and Pampers [5][6] - Financially, PG reported a 3% increase in core EPS and a free cash flow productivity of 102%, with plans to return approximately $15 billion to shareholders in fiscal 2026 [7] Church & Dwight (CHD) - CHD reported a 5% net sales growth in Q3 2025, with organic sales up 3.4%, primarily due to a 4% increase in volume [8][9] - The company is expanding its market share with strong performance from brands like THERABREATH and ARM & HAMMER, and it achieved 7.7% organic growth internationally [10] - CHD's marketing investment increased to 12.8% of sales, supporting new product launches and acquisitions, such as TOUCHLAND, which targets younger consumers [11] - Financially, CHD's adjusted EPS grew by 2.5% in Q3, with cash flow growth of 19.6%, and it has reduced its expected tariff impact for 2025 [12] Comparative Analysis - The Zacks Consensus Estimate indicates PG's fiscal 2026 sales and EPS growth at 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively, while CHD's estimates suggest 1.6% sales growth and 1.2% EPS growth for 2025 [13][16] - Year-to-date, PG's stock has declined by 11.4%, while CHD's has fallen by 19.6%, with both trading below historical P/E medians [17][18] - PG is trading at a forward P/E of 20.7, while CHD's is at 22.38, reflecting CHD's premium valuation due to its consistent market share growth [18][19] Conclusion - Both companies face challenges in the current market, but PG offers stability and a valuation discount, while CHD presents a higher growth potential with a focus on share gains [20][24]

Core Insights - Best Buy reported higher fiscal third-quarter sales and raised its full-year outlook as consumers continue to spend despite concerns that tariffs costs could diminish discretionary spending [1] Company Summary - Best Buy's fiscal third-quarter sales increased, indicating strong consumer spending [1] - The company has raised its full-year outlook, reflecting confidence in continued consumer expenditure [1] - Concerns regarding tariff costs impacting discretionary spending have not significantly affected sales performance [1]

Group 1: Company Performance - Wal-Mart reported an increase in sales and profit outlook for the year, successfully attracting budget-conscious shoppers and managing rising costs, leading to a significant rise in its stock price [1] - TJ Maxx is benefiting from U.S. consumers opting for cheaper alternatives amid economic stress, while Target is struggling with profitability due to necessary price reductions to remain competitive [2] - Home Depot indicated a slowdown in consumer spending on home remodeling and big-ticket purchases due to a cooling job market, reflecting mixed outlooks in the home improvement sector [3] Group 2: Industry Trends - The retail landscape shows a trend of consumers trading down to affordable alternatives, impacting various retailers differently [4] - Lowe's is expected to see growth in online sales and from professional contractors, indicating a shift in consumer purchasing behavior [4] - Upcoming results from Best Buy, Abercrombie and Fitch, and Kohl's are anticipated to provide further insights into the retail sector's performance [4]

Core Insights - Elf Beauty forecasted annual sales and profit below Wall Street estimates due to higher tariff costs and cautious consumer spending, resulting in a 26% drop in shares during extended trading [1] - The company missed expectations for second quarter sales and provided a fiscal 2026 forecast after previously pulling it in May [1] Financial Performance - Elf Beauty expects over $50 million in annual costs from higher U.S. tariffs on imports in fiscal 2026, with China accounting for about 75% of its global production [2] - Gross margin fell approximately 165 basis points to 69% for the quarter ended September 30 [2] - Quarterly adjusted earnings per share were 68 cents, exceeding estimates of 57 cents, following a $1 price increase in August, with no additional price increases planned [3] - Quarterly sales totaled $343.9 million, missing expectations of $366.4 million [4] Market Position and Strategy - The company is streamlining its supply chain and diversifying operations to mitigate tariff impacts, as lower-income shoppers are seeking cheaper alternatives and reducing non-essential purchases [3] - CEO Tarang Amin noted a lack of major product launches compared to the previous year, which had significant success with lip oils [5] Future Outlook - Full-year net sales are expected to be between $1.55 billion and $1.57 billion, below analysts' estimates of $1.65 billion [6] - Adjusted profit is estimated to be in the range of $2.80 to $2.85 per share, also below estimates of $3.58 per share [6]

Core Viewpoint - Tenaris reported a surprising 2% increase in third-quarter net sales, driven by stable drilling activity in North America, despite warnings of margin impacts from tariff costs [1][3]. Financial Performance - Third-quarter net sales rose to $2.98 billion from $2.91 billion year-over-year, marking the first revenue increase in eight quarters, while analysts had anticipated a decline to $2.85 billion [2]. - Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) increased by 9% to $753 million, aided by a $34 million gain from the return of U.S. anti-dumping deposits on imports from Argentina [5]. Regional Performance - Sales in the U.S. and Canada remained stable, supporting the overall sales figures, while the Argentine fracking and coiled tubing services unit faced challenges due to reduced drilling activity [2][3]. - European sales were negatively impacted by lower demand in the North Sea, contributing to the overall regional weakness [3]. Market Conditions - The European steel industry is operating at only 67% capacity due to rising imports and U.S. tariffs, prompting the European Commission to propose significant cuts to tariff-free steel import quotas [4]. - The U.S. has implemented tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminum imports, which were increased to 50% for many countries, affecting the competitive landscape for steel producers [4].

Core Insights - Carter's Inc. shares fell over 14% in pre-market trading after reporting third-quarter results that missed revenue expectations and suspended its 2025 guidance due to tariff-related uncertainty [1] - The company reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.74, slightly above analyst expectations of $0.72, but revenue of $758 million fell short of the consensus forecast of $771.17 million and remained flat compared to the prior-year quarter [1] Financial Performance - Adjusted operating income decreased by 48.9% to $39.4 million, with operating margin dropping to 5.2% from 10.2% a year earlier [2] - Management attributed the decline in profitability to higher tariff costs, investments in product quality, and expenditures on new store openings [2] Cost-Saving Initiatives - The company announced cost-saving measures aimed at improving efficiency, including the reduction of approximately 300 office-based positions, representing 15% of its corporate workforce, by the end of 2025 [3] - Carter's plans to close around 150 North American stores over the next three years, with these actions expected to generate $35 million in annual savings starting in 2026 [3]