RT Patrick Webb (@Patrickwebb)BREAKING: Some military commanders may be preparing to defy unlawful orders that disobey the U.S. Constitution, according to retired Lieutenant General Mark Hertling, per MS NOW. ...

RT 🇵🇸Jamie York (@mediagonebad)New VFP billboard is up outside main gate at Travis Air Force Base!Veterans For Peace reminds our sisters and brothers in the U.S. military that an order to participate in an illegal war is, by extension, an illegal order. You have the right and even the duty to refuse illegal orders. Veterans For Peace and many others will stand with you when you do, and provide helpful information and resources. Whatever legal consequences you may endure pale compared to risking your life in ...

RT The Free State Project (@FreeStateNH)The NH National Guard is being deployed into a foreign war against Iran without a declaration of war.This violates the militia clause of the U.S. Constitution — which specifies that there must be "a law of the union" for state militias to be deployed into foreign wars. ...

“When the framers met in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention in 1787, one of their clearest decisions was to place control over trade and taxation firmly in the hands of Congress.” Ali Velshi explains how tariff powers were among the very first issues that the Founding Fathers aimed to solve since the birth of the U.S. Constitution. MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion, and the World. Same mission. New name. » Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow MS NOW is the go-to destination for ...

Jennifer, can I just get your initial thoughts to this decision from the Supreme Court. Well, I would agree with Senator Schumer that this is a big victory for American consumers. But I would argue from a legal perspective that it's an even bigger victory for the U.S. Constitution, because what this is basically saying is the court is acknowledging that the Constitution gives to the Congress, not to the president, the power to impose tariffs.And so this ruling is saying that the president cannot use this ty ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court's ruling is seen as a significant victory for American consumers and the U.S. Constitution, affirming that only Congress has the authority to impose tariffs, not the president [1][5]. Legal Interpretation - The ruling clarifies that the president cannot reinterpret statutes that do not explicitly mention tariffs or duties to impose tariffs [2][5]. - The court concluded that the statute in question does not delegate tariff authority to the president, reinforcing the constitutional separation of powers [5][6]. Implications for Trade Policy - The decision may influence the president's future actions regarding tariffs, particularly in light of existing trade agreements that were negotiated to avoid tariffs [8]. - If trading partners express concerns about the absence of IPR tariffs, the president might consider invoking Section 122, which allows for tariffs on all goods from all countries [9][10].

RT Andrew Isker 🌳🪓 (@BonifaceOption)Abby, if we didn't have the U.S. Constitution but still had a nation made up of Americans, it would still be America.If we still had the U.S. Constitution, but the nation was no longer made up of Americans, it would no longer be America.Liberia has an almost identical constitution and it is not America because it is not made up of Americans.The U.S. Constitution is not a magical document. It does not function in the way that it does absent the particular people it was mad ...

Joining us, Michigan Senator and ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, Gary Peters. Senator, good to have you. Good to be with you.Thank you. Are you optimistic a deal is going to be made in the next 24 hours. Well, I'm not optimistic in the next 24 hours, but I always keep my optimism going forward.I think it's absolutely essential that we get a deal, you know, basically as Democrats. WHAT WE WANT TO SEE AND ARE DEMANDING ARE BASICALLY GUARD RAILS THAT EVERY POLIC ...

RT John Mappin (@JohnMappin)CARRIE PREJEANDear Friends, observers of truth, and truth-seekers,As someone who is deeply committed to religious freedom, and whose family has experienced and witnessed our own fair share of religious bigotry, intolerance, holocaust, and genocide, we feel compelled to speak.We support Carrie Prejean in her work and purpose to bring religious freedom to all faiths and to the broader world.@CarriePrejean1The recent actions of the Chairman of President Trump’s Religious Liberty Com ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)@LokiJulianus That's why the U.S. Constitution defined only one real branch of government, the judicial branch. The rest, per the judicial branch, is deprecated. The elections are for fun ceremony, like crowning the King in the United "Kingdom". ...