Workflow
US-China Tech Rivalry
icon
Search documents
中国观察:中国的稀土策略-China Musings-China’s Rare Earth Gambit
2025-10-17 01:46
Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry Overview - The focus is on the **rare earth industry** and the geopolitical dynamics between **China** and the **United States** regarding rare earth exports and technology controls. Core Insights and Arguments 1. **China's Export Control Strategy**: Beijing's recent tightening of rare earth rules, effective December 1, aims to strengthen its export control power and respond to U.S. tech restrictions. This includes licensing for foreign goods with ≥0.1% Chinese content and case-by-case approval for inputs used in sub-14nm semiconductors [2][3][4] 2. **Geopolitical Leverage**: China's rare earth controls are designed to serve as leverage in the ongoing tech rivalry with the U.S., particularly ahead of APEC meetings. The timing of these controls is seen as a response to increased U.S. restrictions on China [4][18] 3. **Challenges in Enforcement**: The extraterritorial enforcement of China's rare earth controls is expected to be challenging due to limited global compliance infrastructure compared to the U.S. system, which has a mature compliance network and strong international support [9][11][12] 4. **China's Dominance in Supply Chain**: China holds a dominant position in the rare earth supply chain, with significant market shares in refining (88%) and magnet production (90%). This dominance is reinforced by a ban on exports of critical technologies related to rare earth processing [8][13] 5. **Risk of Overreach**: Aggressive enforcement of rare earth controls by China may accelerate global diversification efforts in rare earth supply chains, as countries like the U.S., EU, and Japan are already advancing joint procurement and strategic stockpiling initiatives [14][18] 6. **Long-term Competitive Confrontation**: The relationship between the U.S. and China is expected to remain characterized by competitive confrontation, with tactical escalations likely but a complete decoupling being improbable due to the economic interdependence [17][18] Additional Important Points 1. **Technological Self-sufficiency**: China's semiconductor self-sufficiency remains low at 24%, with projections to reach 30% by 2027. This indicates vulnerabilities in China's tech landscape that could be exploited by expanded U.S. controls [16] 2. **Calibrated Execution of Controls**: While China is unlikely to reverse its rare earth controls, the implementation will be calibrated to maintain supply continuity, allowing compliant cases to obtain approvals [19] 3. **International Responses**: Various countries are taking steps to diversify their rare earth supply chains, including the U.S. launching initiatives to secure critical materials outside of China and Japan collaborating with France on rare earth projects [23][24] This summary encapsulates the critical aspects of the conference call, highlighting the strategic maneuvers in the rare earth sector and the implications for U.S.-China relations.