RT Steven Pinker (@sapinker)“I have nothing against diversity, equity, and inclusion. But as Voltaire said about the Holy Roman Empire: it was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.” https://t.co/BDq5zp7fts ...

🔥 JUST IN: Saylor says over $100T from traditional equity and credit markets could flow into digital asset–backed instruments, outperforming their fiat counterparts. https://t.co/1e2oU7KrQ9 ...

Personnel Changes & Policy Concerns - Several highly qualified senior female military officials were removed from their posts, raising concerns about a potential campaign to reduce diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the military [1][3] - Defense Secretary's views on women in combat roles, as expressed in his book, suggest a potential bias against women in certain military positions [1] - The removal of these women sends a "sexist warning" to women in the military, potentially discouraging their service and advancement [1] Impact on Military Readiness & Recruitment - Removing qualified women from their positions is economically unsafe and detrimental to national security [7] - Women's propensity to serve in the military has been increasing, making their recruitment crucial for maintaining a strong and diverse force [7][8] - Women are increasingly eligible to serve, highlighting the importance of tapping into their talent pool [8] Gender Equality & Operational Standards - Women have consistently met and excelled at operational standards in the military, demonstrating their capabilities in various roles, including combat [4][5] - Women undergo the same rigorous training as their male counterparts, dispelling the notion that they receive preferential treatment [11][12] - Women often face disadvantages due to gear and equipment designed for male bodies, yet they continue to succeed [15] Veteran Affairs & Healthcare - The removal of these women may discourage other women from seeking healthcare and support services as veterans [19][20] - Concerns exist that cuts in the VA workforce will disproportionately affect women's access to culturally competent healthcare, including mental health screening and early cancer detection [21]

Reference:OpenAI Newsroom (@OpenAINewsroom):These “OpenAI tokens” are not OpenAI equity. We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer.Please be careful. ...

Core Viewpoint - Target is facing significant challenges, with sales declining and stock prices dropping over 60% from their peak, marking the worst performance since the 1990s, but the company is not considered to be dying and has a fundamentally sound financial foundation [1][4][7]. Group 1: Sales and Market Conditions - Target's sales have plateaued and started to decline due to various factors, including increased financial strain on consumers primarily caused by rampant inflation [4]. - Groceries and household essentials accounted for only 40.5% of total merchandise sales last year, meaning that when consumers cut back on discretionary spending, Target is significantly impacted [5]. - Consumer sentiment has dropped to its lowest level since July 2022, exacerbated by tariff uncertainties [5]. Group 2: Company Policies and Backlash - Target faced backlash from shoppers due to its decision to roll back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, leading to a 40-day boycott that began in early March [6]. - Merchandise sales dropped 3.1% year over year in Q1 2025, following a 3.2% decline in Q1 2024, indicating ongoing struggles [6]. Group 3: Financial Stability - Despite challenges, Target maintains a solid financial foundation, with a dividend yield of 4.4% and annual dividend spending of $2 billion, while generating over $3.5 billion in free cash flow over the past year [7][8]. - Target has nearly $2.9 billion in cash, sufficient to fund dividends for a year, and holds an investment-grade credit rating, allowing time to rethink business strategies [8]. Group 4: Growth Plans - Target plans to open 300 new stores over the next decade, increasing its footprint by approximately 15%, indicating a commitment to growth despite current challenges [10]. - The company has less than half the number of stores as Walmart, suggesting that the U.S. market can support further expansion [10]. Group 5: Valuation and Investment Potential - Target's stock is currently priced at a price-to-earnings ratio of 11, significantly lower than Walmart's 41, reflecting pessimistic market expectations [11]. - If Target maintains its 4.4% dividend and achieves mid-single-digit earnings growth, it could generate double-digit annualized investment returns, improving sentiment towards the stock [12]. Group 6: Conclusion - The stock is positioned for potential improvement, as it would require a complete failure for the stock not to recover somewhat from current levels, making it an attractive option for investors seeking dividends while waiting for recovery [13].