Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about a class action lawsuit related to the company's September 2025 IPO, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 20, 2026 [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves and the associated risks [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has been ranked highly for its performance in this area [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: SDM) during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on March 16, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased SDM securities between May 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - To serve as lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the court by March 16, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, and many attorneys at the firm have received accolades from Lawdragon and Super Lawyers [4]. Group 3: Case Background - Smart Digital Group is described as a provider of digital marketing services, and the lawsuit alleges that the company made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant risks related to market manipulation and fraudulent activities [5]. - Specific allegations include the use of social media misinformation, insider trading, and the omission of risks associated with fraudulent trading that could lead to trading suspensions by the SEC or NASDAQ [5]. - The lawsuit claims that these misleading statements resulted in investor damages when the true details became public [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about a class action lawsuit related to the company's September 2025 IPO, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 20, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding the risk of loss reserves increasing shortly after the IPO, which led to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Varonis Systems, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements and failure to disclose material facts regarding the company's performance and customer retention, which led to significant financial losses for investors [4][6]. Group 1: Legal Investigation and Claims - The law firm is encouraging investors who suffered losses in Varonis between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025, to discuss their legal options [1]. - A federal securities class action has been filed against Varonis, with a deadline of March 9, 2026, for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff [4]. - The complaint alleges that Varonis and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements about the company's ability to convert its customer base to a SaaS model, which resulted in artificially inflated stock prices [6]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - On October 28, 2025, Varonis reported third-quarter financial results that significantly missed expectations for Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and lowered its full-year guidance, attributing this to weaker than expected renewals and conversions [7]. - Following the announcement, Varonis' stock price plummeted from $63.00 per share to $32.34 per share on October 29, 2025, marking a decline of approximately 48.67% in just one day [8].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Perrigo Company plc securities between February 27, 2023, and November 4, 2025, of the January 16, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Perrigo securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by January 16, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [2] - The lead plaintiff acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation [2] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has been ranked highly for securities class action settlements since 2013 [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business acquired from Nestlé, which suffered from underinvestment and required substantial capital expenditures [4] - It is claimed that there were significant manufacturing deficiencies in Perrigo's infant formula facility, leading to overstated financial results [4] - The misleading statements about Perrigo's business operations resulted in investor damages when the true details became public [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Klarna Group plc securities about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action related to Klarna's September 2025 IPO [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 20, 2026 [3] - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves and the associated risks [5] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements since 2013 [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Perrigo Company plc securities between February 27, 2023, and November 4, 2025, of the January 16, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Perrigo securities during the specified class period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [2]. - The deadline to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff is January 16, 2026, with the lead plaintiff representing other class members in the litigation [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for the number of securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business acquired from Nestlé, which suffered from significant underinvestment and required substantial capital expenditures [4]. - It is claimed that there were significant manufacturing deficiencies in the infant formula facility, leading to overstated financial results, including earnings and cash flow [4]. - The lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by Perrigo about its business operations were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis, resulting in investor damages when the true details emerged [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Perrigo Company plc to secure legal counsel before the January 16, 2026 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to the company's performance during the specified class period [2][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the securities class action is from February 27, 2023, to November 4, 2025, inclusive [2]. - Investors who purchased Perrigo securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [3]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 16, 2026 [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience and resources [5]. - The firm has a history of significant recoveries for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements [5]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business, including issues related to underinvestment, necessary capital expenditures, and manufacturing deficiencies [6]. - As a result of these misstatements, Perrigo's financial results were overstated, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [6].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is urging investors of Perrigo Company plc to secure legal counsel before the January 16, 2026 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to the company's performance during the specified class period from February 27, 2023, to November 4, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Legal Action Details - Investors who purchased Perrigo securities during the class period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by January 16, 2026 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business, which suffered from significant underinvestment and required substantial capital expenditures [5]. - It is claimed that there were significant manufacturing deficiencies in Perrigo's infant formula facility, leading to overstated financial results, including earnings and cash flow [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by Perrigo about its business operations were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis, resulting in investor damages when the true details became public [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Perrigo Company plc to secure legal counsel before the January 16, 2026 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to the company's performance during the specified class period [2][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the securities class action is from February 27, 2023, to November 4, 2025 [2]. - Investors who purchased Perrigo securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [3]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and potential lead plaintiffs must act by January 16, 2026 [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are advised to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience and resources [5]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [5]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business, including underinvestment in maintenance and significant manufacturing deficiencies [6]. - It is claimed that Perrigo's financial results were overstated due to these issues, leading to misleading positive statements about the company's operations and prospects [6].