Workflow
weaponization
icon
Search documents
Letitia James: Justice System has been weaponized
MSNBC· 2025-10-24 21:01
Legal Challenges & Motions - Defense seeks dismissal in Leticia James's case, citing US Attorney Lindsey Halligan's appointment legality, similar to James Comey's case [1][3] - Validity of indictment hinges on whether Lindsey Halligan was lawfully appointed, as she was the only person who went into the grand jury and signed the indictment [3][4] - Motions regarding Lindsey Halligan's appointment legality in Jim Comey and Leticia James' cases have been consolidated [3] - Defense may argue vindictive or selective prosecution, given career prosecutors initially found insufficient evidence and were subsequently replaced [5] Case Weakness & Unusual Circumstances - Legal experts suggest the case is weak, raising the likelihood it may not proceed to trial [4][5] - A career prosecutor's memo indicated the alleged profit from James's mortgage favorable interest rate might have been as small as $15 per month, questioning criminal intent [9] - The case is unusual due to the small amount of money involved, even if fraud existed [13] - Career prosecutors have deemed the case unsuitable for prosecution by the Justice Department [11][19] Potential Weaponization of DOJ - Concerns raised about the weaponization of the Department of Justice against perceived enemies [15][27] - Allegations that professional judgment of career prosecutors is being overridden for political and vengeful motives [28] - President's comments about Adam Schiff could undermine the prosecution's ability to see the case through, potentially fueling a vindictive prosecution motion [23] - Confirmation of a grand jury investigation, even indirectly, may violate federal rules [24][25]
The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell - Oct. 7 | Audio Only
MSNBC· 2025-10-08 10:41
US Politics & Policy - Marjorie Taylor Green's shift on healthcare, driven by her adult children's insurance premiums doubling, highlights a potential crack in the Republican stance on the Affordable Care Act [2][43] - The report criticizes the Trump administration's cabinet as incompetent, citing instances of officials being unprepared or unwilling to answer questions, particularly from Democrats [3][15][16] - The attorney general is accused of refusing to answer questions from Democratic senators and of potentially covering up corruption, specifically regarding an investigation into Tom H Homeman and the Jeffrey Epstein case [14][33][41] - The report highlights a situation where Tom H Homeman, allegedly took $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents, raising questions about bribery and potential corruption within the administration [19][26][33] - The report mentions the potential impact of Republican policies on healthcare costs, with millions of Americans potentially facing increased premiums or loss of coverage [44][48][55] Political Strategy & Tactics - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's strategy of ridiculing political opponents is presented as a way to dismantle movements based on "insecure masculinity" [42][43] - The report suggests that Republican senators are avoiding oversight and refusing to hold Trump appointees accountable, potentially due to loyalty to the former president [17][41] - The speaker of the House is accused of delaying the swearing-in of a new member to avoid a vote on the Epstein discharge list and of potentially covering for pedophiles [47][48] Healthcare - The expiration of Affordable Care Act tax credits could lead to a doubling of health insurance premiums for many Americans, including Marjorie Taylor Green's family [43][44] - The report suggests that some members of Congress are detached from the realities of healthcare costs because they are wealthy and do not personally shop for health insurance [50][51] - Approximately 4 million Americans are at risk of losing their health insurance coverage due to policy decisions [55]
NY AG James' Attorney Abbe Lowell: Trump has turned the DOJ into the ‘Department of Weaponization’
MSNBC· 2025-08-10 19:39
Back in March, like six generations ago, Donald Trump made a visit to the US Department of Justice. Now, it's not actually a place that's typically visited by presidents. Partly because the DOJ is supposed to operate independently from the presidency, even though it's part of the executive to guarantee or at least and try and make people think there isn't political influence from the White House. But now, you know, we're not living in ordinary times. Trump's visit was more ironic than it was unusual because ...
‘All political persecution all the time’: Rep. Raskin on Trump’s DOJ targeting political enemies
MSNBC· 2025-08-09 14:43
because they are a political opponent. The partisanship, the weaponization will be gone. America will have one tier of justice for all.There will never be an enemy's list within the Department of Justice. I believe that the Justice Department must be independent and must act independently. >> Those were all inspired statements.But in the nearly seven months since Bondi's hearing, we have seen each and every one of those promises fall to the wayside as another one of our institutions has found itself corrupt ...
Fmr. federal prosecutor weighs in on ‘dystopian’ DOJ hire of Jan. 6th rioter
MSNBC· 2025-07-05 16:17
DOJ & Political Implications - A former FBI agent, Jared Wise, who allegedly urged January 6th rioters to kill police officers, has been named an adviser to the Justice Department's "weaponization working group" [1][2][4] - Concerns are raised about the standards and vetting processes for hiring individuals in positions of trust within the DOJ, especially those with backgrounds that might disqualify them from accessing sensitive information or upholding the rule of law [10][11] - The appointment and other decisions, such as firing January 6th prosecutors, are impacting morale within the DOJ, potentially deterring investigations and work on politically sensitive cases [13][14][15][16] - Democratic members of Congress and other high-ranking officials should be concerned about the "weaponization committee" and Wise's involvement, as it raises questions about the integrity and impartiality of the DOJ [9] Diddy Trial & Legal Analysis - The jury's mixed verdict in the Diddy trial is considered a significant win for him, as he was acquitted of the most serious charges, including RICO charges that carried a potential life sentence [17][18][20][22] - Despite the win, Diddy was convicted on serious conduct charges and faces a potential sentence of up to 10 years in prison, although sentencing guidelines may call for a lower sentence [22][23] - There is speculation that Diddy's legal team may seek a pardon, potentially from Donald Trump, given past positive references to Trump in Diddy's music [21][23][24]
U.S. special envoy to the Middle East: Iran nuclear enrichment is the red line
CNBC Television· 2025-06-25 22:15
Nuclear Program Concerns - Enrichment is considered a critical threshold, described as the "red line" [1] - Weaponization is also a "red line" and is deemed unacceptable [1] Regional Stability - Weaponization is seen as a destabilizing factor for the entire region [1] - The concern is that weaponization could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region [1]