securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a con...[Back to Newsroom]## Wish your news had this kind of reach?[Sign Up][Learn About Business Wire] Rosen Law Firm Urges Lakeland Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAKE) Stockholders to Contact the Firm for Information About Their RightsFeb 26, 2026 7:46 PM Eastern Standard Time# Rosen Law Firm Urges Lakeland Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAKE) Stockholders to Contact the Firm for Information About Their Rights ...

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages Navan, Inc. (NAVN) Shareholders To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class ActionFeb 26, 2026 12:06 PM Eastern Standard Time# Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages Navan, Inc. (NAVN) Shareholders To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class ActionShare---LOS ANGELES-- ([BUSINESS WIRE])-- [The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz] announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired Navan, Inc. ("Navan†or the "Company†) ...

"Company†) (NASDAQ: NAVN) common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the Registration Statement issued in connection with the Company's October 31, 2025 initial public offering (the "IPO†or the "Offering†). Navan investors ha...## Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a Leading Securities Fraud Law Firm, Encourages Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) Shareholders To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class ActionLOS ANGELES--([BUSINESS WIRE])--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a leading national shareholder right ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against uniQure N.V. related to alleged securities fraud, with a deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status by April 13, 2026 [1]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased uniQure securities between September 24, 2025, and October 31, 2025 [1]. - Allegations include that the design of uniQure's Pivotal Study was not fully approved by the FDA and that the company downplayed the likelihood of needing to delay its Biologics License Application (BLA) timeline due to additional studies [1]. Company Disclosure - On November 3, 2025, uniQure disclosed that the FDA no longer agreed that data from Phase I/II studies of AMT-130 would be adequate for BLA submission, leading to uncertainty regarding the BLA submission timeline [1]. - Following this disclosure, uniQure's share price fell by $33.40, approximately 49.33%, from $67.69 on October 31, 2025, to $34.29 on November 3, 2025 [1].

Investor Notice: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of the Snowflake Inc. Class Action LawsuitFeb 25, 2026 2:44 PM Eastern Standard Time# Investor Notice: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of the Snowflake Inc. Class Action LawsuitShare---SAN DIEGO--([BUSINESS WIRE])-- [Robbins LLP] informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW) Class A common stock between June 27, 2023 and February 28, 2024. Snowflake is a software compa ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Navan, Inc. (NASDAQ: NAVN) for alleged securities fraud related to its initial public offering (IPO) on October 31, 2025, where approximately 36.9 million shares were sold at $25.00 per share [1] Group 1: Company Financials and Performance - Navan reported a significant increase in sales and marketing expenses, reaching nearly $95 million, which is a 39% increase from $68.5 million in the previous quarter [1] - Following the announcement of the increased expenses and the resignation of the CFO just six weeks post-IPO, Navan's stock price dropped by $1.74, or 11.9%, closing at $12.90 per share on December 16, 2025 [1] - The stock has continued to decline, trading as low as $9.20 per share, representing over a 63% decrease from its IPO price of $25 [1] Group 2: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement issued during the IPO contained materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's business and operations [1] - Specifically, it is claimed that the company did not disclose the substantial increase in sales and marketing expenses necessary to sustain revenue growth, which misled investors regarding the company's financial health [1]

Core Viewpoint - NuScale Power Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading investors regarding its commercialization strategy and the capabilities of its partner, ENTRA1 Energy LLC, which lacked significant experience in nuclear power generation [1][1][1] Summary by Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - Investors who purchased NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025, and November 6, 2025, can seek to be lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit by April 20, 2026 [1] - The lawsuit, titled Truedson v. NuScale Power Corporation, claims violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by NuScale and its executives [1] Allegations Against NuScale - The lawsuit alleges that NuScale made false or misleading statements about ENTRA1's capabilities, failing to disclose that ENTRA1 had no significant experience in building or operating nuclear power projects [1][1] - It is claimed that NuScale's reliance on ENTRA1 for commercialization exposed the company to undisclosed risks, including potential delays and regulatory challenges [1] Financial Impact - On November 6, 2025, NuScale reported a dramatic increase in general and administrative expenses, which rose over 3,000% to $519 million from $17 million in the previous year, primarily due to a $495 million payment to ENTRA1 [1] - The company's quarterly net loss surged to $532 million, up from $46 million in the prior year, following the announcement of the TVA agreement [1] - Analysts questioned NuScale's management about ENTRA1's qualifications during a conference call, leading to a more than 12% decline in NuScale's Class A share price over two days [1]

Core Viewpoint - Enphase Energy, Inc. is facing a class action securities lawsuit due to alleged securities fraud that affected investors between April 22, 2025, and October 28, 2025 [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Enphase and certain executives failed to disclose material information, violating federal securities laws [1] - Allegations include overstating the company's ability to manage channel inventory and offset impacts from the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit [1] - The case is identified as Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc., No. 26-cv-01380 [1] Group 2: Investor Actions - Investors who suffered losses during the specified period have until April 20, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [1] - Participation in any recovery does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [1] Group 3: Law Firm Background - Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC is a prominent boutique securities litigation law firm, ranked among the top 10 firms nationally based on total settlement value [1] - The firm represents a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, in seeking recoveries for investment losses due to corporate fraud [1]

Core Viewpoint - Plug Power, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging securities fraud, with investors having until April 3, 2026, to seek lead plaintiff status [1]. Summary by Relevant Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased securities from January 17, 2025, to November 13, 2025, alleging that Plug Power materially overstated the likelihood of receiving funds from a DOE Loan and the construction of hydrogen production facilities [1]. - The lawsuit claims that Plug Power is likely to pivot towards less ambitious projects with lower commercial potential [1]. Key Events Impacting Stock Price - On October 7, 2025, Plug Power announced the resignation of CEO Andrew Marsh and President Sanjay Shrestha, leading to a 6.3% decline in share price from $4.13 to $3.87 [1]. - Following an agreement for the immediate exercise of outstanding warrants, Plug Power reported gross proceeds of approximately $370 million, but the share price fell by 5.4% from $3.87 to $3.66 [1]. - On November 10, 2025, Plug Power reported financial results and announced a suspension of activities under the DOE loan program, causing a 3.4% drop in share price from $2.65 to $2.56 [1]. - A report on November 13, 2025, confirmed the suspension of plans to construct hydrogen facilities, resulting in a significant 17.6% decline in share price from $2.73 to $2.25 [1]. Financial Implications - Plug Power stated it would receive approximately $1.4 billion in gross proceeds if new warrants are fully exercised, but indicated that proceeds would be used for working capital rather than capital expenditures for the Graham, Texas facility [1].

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential claims on behalf of investors of Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) regarding possible recovery of losses under federal securities laws following a significant stock price decline after the company's earnings call [1][1]. Investigation Background - On December 9, 2025, Phreesia's stock price dropped approximately 25% after the company updated its fiscal 2026 revenue guidance during its third quarter earnings call [1][1]. - The investigation focuses on whether Phreesia's executive officers complied with federal securities laws, which may have implications for investor losses [1][1]. Company Profile - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder-rights law firm with multiple offices across the United States, specializing in securities class action lawsuits and representing both individual and institutional investors [1][1]. - The firm has a notable track record, having recovered approximately $90.725 million for clients in cases where it served as lead or co-lead counsel, and has been recognized as a top plaintiffs' securities law firm in the U.S. [1][1].