Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for violations of securities laws, specifically related to misleading statements about production capabilities and contract valuations [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Red Cat made false and misleading statements regarding the production capabilities of its Salt Lake City facility [2]. - The company allegedly inflated the value of its Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 agreement, leading to materially false public disclosures throughout the class period [2]. - Investors who purchased securities between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025, are encouraged to participate in the lawsuit [1]. Group 2: Law Firm Background - DJS Law Group specializes in securities class actions, corporate governance litigation, and M&A appraisals, focusing on enhancing investor returns through advocacy [3]. - The firm represents some of the largest hedge funds and alternative asset managers, emphasizing the value of litigation claims as significant assets [3].

Core Viewpoint - LegalZoom.com, Inc. is set to report its financial results for the second quarter of 2025 on August 7, 2025, after market close, indicating ongoing transparency and communication with investors [1]. Group 1: Financial Reporting - The financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025, will be announced on August 7, 2025 [1]. - A conference call and webcast will be hosted by the CEO Jeff Stibel and COO/CFO Noel Watson at 4:30 p.m. ET on the same day to discuss the results [1]. Group 2: Company Overview - LegalZoom is a leading online platform for legal services, aimed at transforming how individuals and small businesses navigate the legal system [3]. - The company combines technology with access to experienced attorneys, providing tools for business formations, compliance, estate planning, and ongoing legal support [3]. - With over two decades of experience and millions of customers served, LegalZoom has established itself as a trusted resource for legal needs [4].

Core Insights - Stephen Almond will join the Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL) as Vice President of Policy and Consulting in September 2025, following his role at the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) [1][4] - CIPL is positioned to play a crucial role in navigating the evolving landscape of digital regulation and data governance amid rapid technological advancements [4][6] Group 1: Stephen Almond's Background and Expertise - Almond has over 15 years of experience in innovation policy, regulatory strategy, and public impact, recognized as a key figure in UK AI policy [2][3] - His expertise includes artificial intelligence, online tracking, data governance, and international digital policy, having significantly influenced the UK's digital regulation agenda at the ICO [2][3] - Prior to his role at ICO, Almond held leadership positions in the public sector and was a Fellow at the World Economic Forum, focusing on regulatory innovation [3] Group 2: CIPL's Mission and Future Direction - CIPL aims to engage in thought leadership and develop best practices for responsible data use, facilitating collaboration among business leaders, regulators, and policymakers [8] - The organization is experiencing a pivotal moment as it addresses the challenges posed by rapid technological changes and the need for accountable innovation [4][5] - Almond's appointment is expected to enhance CIPL's consulting work and thought leadership on data policy, privacy, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Fortrea Holdings Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements about its financial projections and business model during the specified class period [1][2]. Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Fortrea overestimated the revenue contributions from its long-term projects, known as the Pre-Spin Projects, for the year 2025 [1]. - It is alleged that the company overstated the cost savings expected from exiting transition services agreements [1]. - The previously announced EBITDA targets for 2025 were inflated due to these misrepresentations [1]. - The viability of Fortrea's post-spin-off business model and its financial prospects were also overstated [1]. - Overall, the company's public statements were materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [1]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from July 3, 2023, to February 28, 2025 [1]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by August 1, 2025, to potentially be appointed as lead plaintiffs [2]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software during the case lifecycle [2]. Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [3].

Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against Strategy Incorporated (NASDAQ:MSTR) due to a class action complaint alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by the board of directors during the specified class period [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The law firm is encouraging long-term stockholders of Strategy who suffered losses between April 30, 2024, and April 4, 2025, to discuss their legal rights [1]. - A class action complaint was filed on May 16, 2025, concerning the alleged misleading statements made by the company's management regarding its business and operations [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Management - The complaint claims that the anticipated profitability of Strategy's bitcoin-focused investment strategy was overstated [2]. - It is alleged that the risks associated with bitcoin's volatility and potential losses on digital assets were understated, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [2]. Group 3: Contact Information - Long-term stockholders with information or questions regarding the claims can contact the law firm directly via phone or email [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been initiated against Fortrea Holdings Inc. due to allegations of materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business operations and financial prospects [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Fortrea Holdings overestimated the revenue contributions from Pre-Spin Projects for 2025 earnings [1] - It is alleged that the company overstated potential cost savings from exiting Transition Services Agreements (TSAs) [1] - The previously announced EBITDA targets for 2025 are claimed to be inflated as a result of these misstatements [1] - The viability of the company's post-Spin-Off business model and its financial prospects were also allegedly overstated [1] - Overall, the company's public statements are described as materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [1]

NEW YORK, July 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationally acclaimed investor rights law firm, reminds Centene Corporation (“Centene” or the “Company”) (NYSE: CNC) investors of an upcoming deadline involving a securities fraud class action lawsuit commenced against the Company. Should You Join This Class Action Lawsuit? Do you, or did you, own shares of Centene Corporation (NYSE: CNC)?Did you purchase your shares between December 12, 2024 and June 30, 2025, inclusive?Did you lose money ...

Core Viewpoint - A shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit against Centene Corporation for alleged misrepresentations regarding the company's enrollment and morbidity rates during a specified period [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired Centene's securities between December 12, 2024, and June 30, 2025 [1]. - Defendants are accused of making misrepresentations about the state of Centene's enrollment and morbidity rates [2]. Group 2: Lead Plaintiff Information - Interested parties wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must file papers by September 8, 2025 [3]. - Serving as lead plaintiff is not a requirement for sharing in any potential recovery, and shareholders can remain absent class members if they choose not to take action [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Bernstein Liebhard LLP has recovered over $3.5 billion for clients since 1993 and has represented large public and private pension funds [4]. - The firm has been recognized multiple times for its success in litigating class actions, being named to The National Law Journal's "Plaintiffs' Hot List" thirteen times and listed in The Legal 500 for sixteen consecutive years [4].

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP has initiated an investigation into DexCom, Inc. for potential breaches of fiduciary duties and violations of federal securities laws due to misleading public statements made by certain insiders regarding the company's expansion strategy and market share [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Investigation Details - The investigation focuses on actions taken by DexCom insiders between April 28, 2023, and June 5, 2024, which led to the issuance of false and misleading statements about the company's growth and market position [2]. - DexCom began making corrective disclosures starting April 25, 2024, revealing that its growth and business prospects were significantly lower than previously claimed [2]. - By the final corrective disclosure on July 25, 2024, DexCom's share price had decreased by over 40.6% [2]. Shareholder Rights - Current stockholders who held DexCom stock before April 28, 2023, are encouraged to contact Johnson Fistel to discuss their legal rights regarding the investigation [3].

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by certain officers and directors of Open Lending Corporation, following allegations of misrepresentation and failure to disclose critical financial information [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Misrepresentation - Insiders at Open Lending allegedly caused the company to misrepresent or fail to disclose key aspects of its financial health, including risk-based pricing models and profit share revenue [2]. - The company reportedly failed to disclose that its 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had significantly decreased in value compared to their outstanding loan balances [2]. - There are claims regarding the underperformance of the company's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans, which contributed to misleading positive statements about the company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Legal Action and Shareholder Rights - Kuehn Law is reaching out to shareholders who purchased LPRO shares prior to February 24, 2022, to inform them of their potential rights and the limited time available to enforce those rights [3]. - The firm emphasizes the importance of shareholder participation in maintaining the integrity of financial markets [4].