Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging KBR, Inc. investors to secure legal counsel before the November 18, 2025 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during the class period from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased KBR securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and potential lead plaintiffs must act by November 18, 2025, to represent other class members [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that KBR made materially false and misleading statements regarding its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command, which affected investors when the truth was revealed [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of the Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, highlighting the firm's expertise and reputation in the field [4].

Core Viewpoint - KBR, Inc. is facing a securities class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements regarding its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command, which has raised concerns about KBR's ability to fulfill contracts [5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action pertains to KBR securities purchased between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for November 18, 2025 [1][3]. - Investors who purchased KBR securities during the specified period may be eligible for compensation without incurring out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against KBR - The lawsuit claims that KBR made materially false and misleading statements about its business operations and prospects, particularly regarding its partnership with TRANSCOM [5]. - Defendants allegedly misrepresented the status of the Global Household Goods Contract, claiming no issues while being aware of significant concerns [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes its experience and success in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, ranking in the top four since 2013 and recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - KBR, Inc. is facing a securities class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements regarding its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command, which may have impacted investors negatively during the specified class period [5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to KBR securities purchased between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for November 18, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors who purchased KBR securities during the class period may be eligible for compensation without upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm encourages investors to select experienced legal counsel, highlighting its own track record in securities class actions and significant settlements achieved for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements, including a notable $438 million recovery for investors in 2019 [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against KBR - The lawsuit claims that KBR's management made materially false statements regarding the partnership with HomeSafe, despite known issues that could affect contract fulfillment [5]. - It is alleged that these misleading statements led to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - In Q3 2025, the company achieved a total revenue growth of 14% and an organic revenue growth of 9%, excluding the impact from a confidential contract [5][17] - Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded by 60 basis points to 9.8%, driven by improved program performance and accretive acquisitions [18][24] - The company generated $163 million in cash flow from operations, resulting in a free cash flow conversion of 135% for the quarter [20][24] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Critical Infrastructure revenue increased by 18% year-over-year, with organic growth of 13%, driven by recent contract wins and growth on existing contracts [19] - Federal Solutions revenue increased by 9% year-over-year, with organic growth of 5%, excluding the confidential contract [19] - Adjusted EBITDA for Critical Infrastructure increased by 83% year-over-year, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 10.3% [19] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a book-to-bill ratio of 1.0 times for the quarter and trailing twelve months, maintaining a streak since its IPO [6][21] - The total backlog at the end of Q3 was nearly $9 billion, with 72% funded, and a funded backlog of $6.4 billion, the highest since the IPO [16][22] - The company has a $58 billion pipeline, including over 115 opportunities worth $100 million or more [16][42] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on capitalizing on long-term macro trends in national security and infrastructure, with a strong emphasis on operationally relevant solutions [4][12] - Recent acquisitions, particularly in the water market, are aimed at enhancing capabilities and expanding presence in high-growth areas [11][49] - The company expects mid-single-digit organic revenue growth excluding the confidential contract for the foreseeable future [12][47] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about growth opportunities, citing strong program execution and a robust pipeline of large opportunities [12][24] - The company anticipates a surge in activity once the government reopens, as there is a significant backlog of contracting actions [94][96] - The FAA air traffic control system contract is expected to be awarded imminently, with the company well-positioned to capitalize on this opportunity [39][90] Other Important Information - The company was recognized as one of the world's best companies by Time and received the Diamond Award from ACEC New York for its work on the Brooklyn Bridge Rehabilitation Project [12] - The company completed its third accretive acquisition of the year in the strategic water market [17] Q&A Session Summary Question: Revenue from the confidential contract in Q3 and its impact on Q4 guidance - Management confirmed that there was some revenue from the confidential contract in Q3, but it was small and immaterial, with expectations for Q4 to be similar [27] Question: Critical Infrastructure margins and future expectations - Management indicated that strong program execution has led to consistent double-digit margins in Critical Infrastructure, with expectations for continued solid performance [29][31] Question: Top line performance and federal customer capacity - Management noted that timing issues affected Q3 performance, with expectations for a recovery in Q4 as delays are resolved [35][37] Question: FAA contract and its implications - Management confirmed that the FAA air traffic control system contract is not impacted by the government shutdown and is expected to be awarded soon [39] Question: Growth outlook for Federal Solutions - Management projected high single-digit growth for Federal Solutions, with a strong pipeline and backlog supporting this outlook [76] Question: Impact of the government shutdown on operations - Management stated that 50% of the business is not federal government-related, and a surge in activity is expected once the government reopens [94][96]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command, leading to investor losses during the specified Class Period [3][7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that KBR was aware of concerns from TRANSCOM about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill its Global Household Goods Contract for months but failed to disclose this information [3]. - KBR allegedly misled investors by asserting that its partnership with TRANSCOM would continue to grow despite these concerns [3]. - The company's public statements throughout the Class Period are claimed to be false and materially misleading, resulting in damages to investors when the truth was revealed [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased KBR shares between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm for more information and to discuss their rights [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 18, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across the United States [5].

Key Points The company notched double-digit rises in both revenue and profitability for its kickoff quarter of fiscal 2026. While it beat only modestly on the top line, its adjusted profitability came in well higher than expected. 10 stocks we like better than CACI International › If the opening quarter of CACI International's (NYSE: CACI) fiscal 2026 is any indication, the company and its shareholders are in for a good ride this year. The defense company posted its first quarter earnings release a ...

Core Viewpoint - KBR, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its partnership with HomeSafe and the ability to fulfill a global household goods contract for the U.S. Department of Defense [3][4]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint alleges that KBR's management was aware of significant concerns from the U.S. Department of Defense regarding HomeSafe's capability to meet contract obligations but continued to assert that the partnership was functioning well and would improve in future quarters [3]. - As a result, the statements made by KBR regarding its business operations and future prospects were deemed materially false and misleading [3]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025 [3]. - Shareholders who purchased KBR shares during this period are encouraged to register for participation in the class action, with a deadline set for November 18, 2025 [4]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Registered shareholders will be enrolled in a portfolio monitoring system to receive updates on the case's progress [4]. - There is no cost or obligation for shareholders to participate in the lawsuit [4]. Law Firm Information - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [5].

Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command [7] - The lawsuit covers investors who purchased KBR securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, and they have until November 18, 2025, to apply as lead plaintiffs [7] Allegation Details - The complaint alleges that KBR was aware of concerns from TRANSCOM about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill its Global Household Goods Contract but failed to disclose this information [3] - KBR allegedly misled investors by claiming that its partnership with TRANSCOM would continue to grow despite these concerns [3] - The company's public statements during the class period are claimed to be false and materially misleading, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [3] Next Steps - Investors who suffered losses and wish to learn more about the claims or have questions can contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. for assistance [4] - There is no cost or obligation for investors to reach out for more information [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of KBR, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements made by the company during a specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Period and Allegations - The class period for the lawsuit is from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025 [3]. - Allegations include that KBR's management made materially false and misleading statements about the company's partnership with HomeSafe, despite knowing that the U.S. Department of Defense had concerns about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill its contract [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by November 18, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the case's progress [4]. Law Firm's Mission - The Gross Law Firm aims to protect investors' rights and seeks recovery for those who suffered losses due to deceitful practices by companies [5].

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of KBR, Inc. securities from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025, about the November 18, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action lawsuit [1] - Investors who purchased KBR securities during the specified period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3] Case Details - The lawsuit alleges that KBR's defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's partnership with HomeSafe and its ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract, despite known concerns from the U.S. Department of Defense [5] - The lawsuit claims that these misleading statements resulted in damages to investors when the true details became public [5] Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4] - The firm has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]