Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its financial guidance and undisclosed risks associated with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue contributor [2]. Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that FLR and certain executives failed to disclose rising costs related to significant projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, which were impacted by subcontractor design errors, material price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - Additionally, the company is accused of underreporting the adverse effects of decreased client capital spending and broader economic uncertainties [3]. Financial Performance - In February 2025, FLR projected a full-year 2025 adjusted EPS of $2.25 to $2.75 and EBITDA of $575 million to $675 million, which was reaffirmed in May 2025 [4]. - On August 1, 2025, FLR reported disappointing second-quarter results, with a non-GAAP EPS of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by 23%, and revenue of $3.98 billion, which was $570 million below expectations and a 5.9% decline year-over-year [5]. - Following the release of these results, FLR significantly lowered its FY 2025 outlook, attributing the downturn to project delays and reduced client awards, leading to a stock price drop of $15.35, or 27.04%, closing at $41.42 [5].

Market Sentiment and Performance - The US Senate's deal to end the government shutdown, the longest in history, positively influenced market sentiment in Australia, with the XJO index rising by 0.60% to 8,824 points [1] - US futures showed an upward trend during the Australian session, with the NASDAQ increasing by 300 points or 1.2%, indicating a potential pause in AI valuation concerns [4][6] Sector Performance - On the ASX, the Information Technology sector led gains on Monday, rising by 2%, followed by energy and materials sectors, while consumer staples and real estate lagged [9][11] - Droneshield faced negative market reaction after retracting a statement about new contracts worth $7 million, while ANZ's earnings were positively received despite a decline in key profit metrics [11] Company-Specific Developments - Downer EDI secured a $750 million contract from Chevron for maintaining non-process infrastructure at Gorgon and Wheatstone in Western Australia [11] - Rare earths stocks experienced a surge, potentially linked to reports suggesting that China's REE deal with the US may not be as trade-friendly as anticipated [12] Commodity and Trade Insights - The price of gold is hovering above US$4,000, indicating ongoing uncertainty in the market and sustained demand for safe-haven assets [14] - China has reportedly suspended export restrictions on antimony and other critical mineral exports to the US, with Larvotto shares rising by 8% amid speculation about the impact of these suspensions [13]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit for purchasers of Fluor Corporation securities during the specified Class Period, highlighting the importance of the lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must act by the lead plaintiff deadline to represent other class members [3][6]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, noting its history of successful settlements and recognition in the field [4]. - The firm has achieved significant recoveries for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and economic uncertainty [5]. - It is claimed that these misstatements led to a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results, resulting in damages for investors when the truth was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors of Fluor Corporation to secure counsel before the lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 14, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which negatively impacted the company's business and financial results [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience and resources [4]. - The Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements in securities class actions, including significant recoveries for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit claims that costs associated with specific projects were increasing due to subcontractor errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays, which were not disclosed to investors [5]. - It is asserted that the company's financial guidance for 2025 was unreliable, and the impact of economic uncertainty on Fluor's performance was understated [5].

Core Insights - Fluor Corporation reported an EPS of $0.41, slightly below the estimated $0.44, while revenue reached $4.22 billion, exceeding the forecast of $4.20 billion [1][6] Financial Performance - The company's price-to-sales ratio is 0.44, indicating a relatively low valuation compared to its sales, suggesting potential undervaluation of revenue-generating capacity [3] - Fluor's enterprise value to sales ratio stands at 0.37, further supporting the notion of modest valuation in relation to overall sales [3] - The earnings yield is 54.82%, reflecting a strong return on investment for shareholders [4] - A debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18 indicates conservative use of debt, showcasing a stable capital structure [4] - The current ratio of 1.62 suggests a healthy liquidity position to cover short-term liabilities [4] - The enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio of 17.44 highlights the company's cash flow efficiency, crucial for sustaining growth [5] Strategic Initiatives - Fluor's agreement with NuScale Power is a strategic move to convert and monetize its remaining stake, expected to influence the financial dynamics of both companies [2][6]

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation (NYSE:FLR) is facing multiple securities fraud class action lawsuits that may affect investor sentiment, despite its potentially undervalued stock metrics as it prepares to release quarterly earnings on November 7, 2025 [1][6]. Financial Performance Expectations - The company anticipates an earnings per share (EPS) of $0.44 and revenue of approximately $4.2 billion for the upcoming quarterly earnings [1][6]. Legal Challenges - The lawsuits, initiated by firms such as Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, Schall Law Firm, and Gross Law Firm, allege that FLR failed to disclose critical information regarding escalating project costs due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [2]. - These legal actions cover investors who purchased FLR securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for November 14, 2025 [2]. Valuation Metrics - FLR's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is approximately 1.84, indicating a low valuation relative to its earnings [3]. - The price-to-sales ratio of 0.45 and enterprise value to sales ratio of 0.38 suggest that FLR's stock is trading at less than half of its annual sales per share, appealing to value investors [3]. Financial Health Indicators - The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18, indicating a low level of debt compared to its equity [4]. - A current ratio of 1.62 suggests that FLR has sufficient liquidity to cover its short-term liabilities [4]. - However, the enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio of 17.67 reflects a higher valuation in relation to its cash flow from operations, which investors should consider [4]. Future Considerations - As FLR approaches its earnings release, the outcome of the lawsuits and the company's ability to manage project costs amid economic uncertainty will be crucial for its financial performance and stock valuation [5].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue for Q1 2026 was $211.9 million, a 28% increase from $165.6 million in Q1 2025, driven by larger new construction projects [14] - Consolidated gross profit increased 82% to $14.2 million compared to $7.8 million in the prior year, with gross margin improving to 6.7% from 4.7% [14] - Net loss for Q1 2026 was $3.7 million, an improvement from a $9.2 million net loss in Q1 2025, with GAAP EPS loss narrowing to $0.13 from $0.33 [16] - Adjusted EBITDA was positive at $2.5 million compared to a loss of $5.9 million in the same quarter last year [16] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Storage and terminal solutions segment revenue was $109.5 million, a 40% increase from $78.2 million last year, representing 52% of consolidated revenue [17] - Utility and power infrastructure segment revenue increased 33% to $74.5 million, accounting for 35% of consolidated revenue, with gross profit rising 419% to $5.5 million [18] - Process industrial facility segment revenue decreased to $27.9 million from $31.4 million, representing 13% of consolidated revenue, with gross profit declining to $0.6 million [19] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Total opportunity pipeline is currently at $6.7 billion, primarily in storage and related facilities for LNG, NGLs, and ammonia [8] - Bidding activity remains healthy across segments, with a book-to-bill ratio of 0.9 and a total backlog of $1.2 billion [7][20] - The company anticipates a re-acceleration in award activity for larger multi-year projects starting in late fiscal 2026 [10] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company emphasizes safety as a core value, which strengthens competitive edge and client relationships [4][5] - Focus areas include expanding markets, client base, and backlog in process and industrial facilities, with a disciplined approach to bidding and contracting [10][11] - The company is committed to disciplined capital allocation and aims to return to sustained profitability while targeting growth opportunities [12] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in achieving full-year revenue guidance of $875-$925 million based on strong backlog and first-quarter performance [6][23] - The company expects continued margin improvement as backlog converts to revenue, with a focus on execution excellence [12][23] - Management noted that the competitive landscape is not becoming tougher, as the removal of projects was due to client strategy changes rather than market conditions [26][28] Other Important Information - The company incurred $3.3 million in restructuring costs in Q1, with minimal costs expected for the remainder of fiscal 2026 [15][32] - Cash decreased to $217 million, with liquidity remaining strong at $249 million and no outstanding debt [20] Q&A Session Summary Question: Regarding the two projects removed from backlog - Management clarified that the removals were not indicative of a tougher competitive landscape but rather client strategy changes [26][28] Question: Timing for large project awards - Management indicated that larger projects take longer to develop, but they are tracking several opportunities and expect a re-acceleration in awards [29][30] Question: Impact of restructuring on break-even dynamics - Restructuring has lowered the break-even revenue point to $210-$215 million, improving earnings power [32] Question: Target projects within the gas power project space - The company has capabilities in gas power plant construction and anticipates increased project opportunities in this area [35][37] Question: Future backlog expectations - Management expects backlog to remain strong, with the recent removals viewed as one-off situations rather than a trend [39][40]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 14, 2025 [2] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding the costs associated with several major projects, which were impacted by subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [4] - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively affected Fluor's business and financial results, rendering its financial guidance for 2025 unreliable [4] - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by Fluor were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true details became known [4]

Core Points - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of KBR, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during a specified class period [1][3] - The class period for the lawsuit is from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025, during which KBR allegedly made false claims about its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command [3] - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by November 18, 2025, to potentially recover losses incurred due to the alleged misleading statements [4] Allegations - The complaint alleges that KBR's management was aware of concerns regarding HomeSafe's ability to fulfill a global household goods contract but continued to assert that the partnership was functioning without issues [3] - As a result of these misleading statements, KBR's business operations and future prospects were misrepresented, leading to an artificial inflation of the company's stock price [3] Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased KBR shares during the class period can register to be included in the case and will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software [4] - There is no cost or obligation for shareholders to participate in the class action [4] About the Law Firm - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5] - The firm aims to ensure that companies engage in responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors affected by misleading statements [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Fluor Corporation who incurred losses exceeding $100,000 during the specified class period to seek legal counsel before the lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must act by the November 14, 2025 deadline to serve as lead plaintiff [3][5]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs related to the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highway projects, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [5]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively affected Fluor's business and financial results, rendering their financial guidance for 2025 unreliable [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by Fluor were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].