Group 1: Trade Policy Impact - The new "reciprocal tariff" policy announced by Trump raises the actual tariff rate on China to 54%, slightly above market expectations, with significant impacts on the EU (20%), Vietnam (46%), Taiwan (32%), and several Southeast Asian countries [1] - The policy may represent a temporary "endpoint" for U.S. tariff increases, with future execution potentially weaker than verbal communications, necessitating close monitoring of policy implementation and new developments [1] - Observations on U.S.-China relations should focus on the shift from "sanctions-counter-sanctions" to "managing differences-risk prevention," as uncertainty continues to affect asset prices [1] Group 2: Price Governance Mechanism - The recent opinion from the Central Committee and State Council emphasizes that prices determined by the market should be left to market forces, which is expected to lead to more accurate price reflections of supply and demand [2] - The opinion outlines arrangements for price mechanisms in energy, public utilities, agricultural products, public services, and data elements, serving as a foundation for macroeconomic governance [2] - Aiming for a price target around "2%", the market-oriented pricing mechanism is anticipated to promote moderate price recovery [2] Group 3: Public Utilities and Environmental Sector - The deepening of price reforms and improvement of governance mechanisms are expected to lead to more market-oriented pricing in public utilities such as electricity, water, and gas [3] - Large hydropower, currently with low marketization and significantly below industry averages, is likely to benefit from price adjustments, leading to increased electricity prices and revenues [3] - The water and gas sectors, facing serious price transmission delays, may see improvements in overall returns and stability as pricing adjustment mechanisms are enhanced [3] Group 4: Property Management Services - The anticipated introduction of strong price limits for property management fees in Chongqing in 2023 is not expected to set a nationwide trend, with a focus on encouraging quality services at reasonable prices [6] - The property service sector is currently facing multiple challenges, including weak fundamentals and declining growth rates, but is expected to have significant upward potential as policies shift [6] - Property service companies are viewed as having a notable safety margin, making them attractive to investors [6] Group 5: Debt Market Dynamics - The shift towards ultra-long government bonds and rising interest rates since 2025 have increased interest rate risks for banks, particularly those relying on bond investments for profit [7] - The first quarter of 2025 saw a sharp decline in bond investment returns due to rising rates, putting pressure on net profits [7] - Banks may be forced to sell long-term bonds in response to interest rate risks, which could negatively impact the long-term bond market in the second quarter of 2025 [7] Group 6: Consumer Goods Sector Outlook - The consumer goods sector experienced a weak demand trend in the first quarter of 2025, influenced by the staggered impact of the Spring Festival and limited improvement in terminal demand [9] - Despite cost pressures from rising prices of certain raw materials, the overall cost of most materials remains favorable, providing some relief [9] - The second quarter of 2025 is expected to see a recovery in consumer goods revenue due to a low base and demand resurgence, with specific opportunities in the dairy, beverage, and snack sectors [9]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that good housing requires good services, and good services necessitate quality and reasonable pricing. It predicts that the strong price limit policy for property fees in Chongqing in 2023 will not set a nationwide trend, but will encourage quality and reasonable pricing, potentially reversing market expectations for pricing and profitability in the property service industry [1][10]. Summary by Sections Policy Changes - In late 2023, Chongqing introduced a new property service fee management method, establishing a government-guided price for residential property service fees, which alters the previous market-adjusted pricing for high-level services. The highest service fee was set at 1.9 yuan per square meter per month, with potential exemptions for vacant properties [2]. Impact of Price Limits - The strong price limit policy may lead to a significant decline in the collection rate of existing property service contracts, creating negative externalities. The pricing constraints on existing contracts are deemed reasonable, as buyers have no bargaining power. However, the 1.9 yuan per square meter limit is considered outdated, as many listed companies charge above this rate. As of October 2024, 34% of local communities in Chongqing charged over 2 yuan per square meter [3]. Industry Challenges - Four main factors suggest that strong price limits are not advisable: 1. Overall property service quality in China is insufficient, with property fees/rent ratios significantly lower than in other countries, leading to rapid depreciation of housing value [4]. 2. The profitability of basic services in property companies is already low, and imposing price limits could drive out quality providers, negatively impacting living conditions [5]. 3. The complexity of establishing homeowners' committees and collective decision-making complicates the implementation of price limits on existing contracts [6]. 4. Residents often lack awareness of the quality of property services, which can lead to a misunderstanding of the implications of low property fees [6]. Future Policy Directions - The article anticipates that future policies will guide property service companies to enhance service quality and promote the concept of quality and reasonable pricing, rather than merely imposing price limits. The government has already repealed previous price limit documents, indicating a shift towards ensuring that any price limits set are above the average service costs of quality property service companies [7][8]. Investment Strategy - The article suggests that the property service sector is currently experiencing a dual low in valuation and profitability due to policy concerns and other factors. However, it is expected that there will be significant upward elasticity in the future, making it a sector worth monitoring for policy turning points [10].

文 ｜ 陈聪 张全国 刘河维 李俊波 我们认为，困扰民企物业服务公司的历史问题已经消散，企业的分红普遍具备很强吸引力，现金资 产具备安全边际。而且，绝大多数民企物业服务公司经营性现金持续净流入，高分红是完全可持续 的。和2 0 2 4年秋天不同，当前物业服务板块可能的催化剂，并不是地产领域信用的好转（当然地 产信用也是平稳的），而是即将公布的2 0 2 4年年报有望兑现可持续的高分红，以及长期稳健发展 的愿景。我们推荐当前头部民营物业服务企业。 ▍ 历史因素形成的估值洼地。 当前，我们统计的样本民企物业管理公司的市值/企业在手资金为1 . 9 x，我们预计这些企业2 0 2 4 年股息率为5 . 6%，如果剔除金科服务，预计为6 . 0%。由于历史上房地产关联方出险，部分应收 款出现坏账，这些企业融资并购扩张的发展路径被证伪，民营物业服务公司的市值相较历史高点 大幅下降，截至2 0 2 5年3月1 3日收盘价，融创服务、碧桂园服务、永升服务、新城悦服务、金科 服务股价都较历史高点下降了超过9 0%。 ▍ 部分公司具备现金持续造血能力。 2 0 2 2年之后，物业服务板块逐渐进入低潮，此后所有民企物业服务公司基 ...

Group 1: BC Equipment and Manufacturing Industry - BC is currently the most visible expansion direction, with leading manufacturers planning to add 40-65 GW/year of BC capacity from 2024 to 2027, alongside a significant increase from the existing 780 GW TOPCon upgrades [1] - BC technology offers significant equipment flexibility, primarily involving 2-3 laser processes and 1 coating process, with a notable increase in the use of LPCVD equipment [1] - Risks include slower-than-expected technological advancements in BC, reduced willingness to upgrade battery capacity, and potential market competition deterioration [1] Group 2: Banking Sector and Debt Market - Some commercial banks have recently sold bonds from OCI and AC accounts to realize floating profits, which may amplify market impacts in a volatile debt market [2] - The current selling behavior of banks is not expected to trigger a market panic, with short-term adjustments facing less pressure compared to long-term [2] Group 3: Policy and Economic Impact - Hohhot has introduced new childbirth subsidy details, with the maximum subsidy reaching 100,000 yuan per child, indicating a potential nationwide rollout of similar policies [4] - If extrapolated nationwide, the fiscal subsidy scale is estimated to reach 901 billion, 1,363 billion, and 1,825 billion yuan from 2025 to 2027, still falling short of international standards [4] Group 4: Defense and Aerospace Industry - The 2025 Government Work Report highlights deep-sea technology for the first time, indicating a focus on deep-sea development and potential investment opportunities in acoustic and titanium materials [6] - Risks include accelerated competition among countries, potential underperformance in enterprise capacity expansion, and fluctuations in raw material costs [6] Group 5: Coal Industry - The coal sector has seen improved expectations, leading to a rise in stock prices, driven by high dividend styles, stable thermal coal prices, and optimized stock structures [8] - The bottom price expectation for coal is becoming clearer, with potential price increases if demand improves and inventory decreases [8] Group 6: Property Services Sector - The historical issues facing private property service companies have dissipated, with strong dividend attractiveness and sustainable cash flow [10] - The upcoming 2024 annual reports are expected to confirm high dividends and a vision for stable long-term development [10] Group 7: Tin Industry - The suspension of mining operations by Alphamin Resources in the Democratic Republic of Congo could lead to a significant reduction in global tin supply, potentially increasing tin prices above 300,000 yuan/ton [12] - The expected supply gap in 2025 may widen due to the suspension and slower-than-expected recovery of Myanmar's tin mines [12] Group 8: New Materials in Military Industry - Defense spending is projected to grow by 7.2% in 2025, indicating a recovery in demand for military materials and potential valuation recovery for upstream companies [13] - The military industry is at a turning point, with significant demand expected to be released in 2025 [13]

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of discounted property management fees for vacant homes reflects a response to the new dynamics in the real estate market and the demands of homeowners, aiming to alleviate financial burdens and improve relations between property owners and management companies [2][3][4]. Group 1: Policy Implementation - Multiple cities, including Changsha, Zhenjiang, and Qingdao, have initiated policies to reduce property management fees for vacant homes, with discounts ranging from 60% to 70% based on the duration of vacancy [2][3]. - Changsha's policy offers a tiered discount structure, where fees are reduced to 70% after 24 months of vacancy and to 90% thereafter [2]. - Zhenjiang allows a 70% fee for homes vacant for over six months, with negotiations for those vacant over 24 months [2]. Group 2: Market Response - Over ten cities have adopted similar discount policies, with a significant number located in Jiangsu province, indicating a growing trend in addressing the issue of vacant homes [3]. - The largest discount reported is in Lanzhou, where vacant homes for over six months can have fees reduced to 50% [3]. - Experts suggest that these policies not only ease the financial pressure on homeowners but also help to balance the long-standing conflicts between property management and owners [3][4]. Group 3: Industry Challenges and Opportunities - Property management companies face challenges due to reduced income from discounted fees, which may lead to cuts in service quality [4][5]. - Some companies view the situation as an opportunity to enhance service quality and diversify offerings, such as expanding into home services and community group purchases [5]. - The competitive landscape in the property management sector is intensifying, prompting companies to adapt their pricing strategies and improve service delivery to retain clients [5]. Group 4: Definition and Standardization Issues - There is currently no unified national definition of "vacant homes," leading to confusion and potential discrepancies in policy implementation [6]. - Different cities use varying criteria to define vacancy, such as the absence of utility usage or written confirmation from property owners [6]. - Legal experts emphasize the need for a standardized approach to avoid inconsistencies and ensure fair application of the discount policies across different regions [6].

中天服务股份有限公司 报告期，公司合并报表范围内实现营业收入3.63亿元，同比增长6.80%；实 现归属于上市公司股东的净利润708.02万元，同比下降64.98%；归属上市公司股 东扣非后的净利润2,601.24万元，同比下降29.21%；报告期末总资产4.99亿元， 同比增长55.02%；归属于上市公司股东的净资产为3.02亿元，同比增长128.73%。 1 二、2024年董事会运作情况 （一）董事会会议召开情况 2024年度董事会工作报告 2024年度，中天服务股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）董事会严格按照《公 司法》《证券法》等法律法规以及《公司章程》《董事会议事规则》的规定，组 织和领导公司经营管理层及全体员工围绕发展战略，积极推动公司业务深度发展， 本着恪尽职守、勤勉尽责的工作态度，认真贯彻落实股东大会的各项决议，切实 履行股东大会赋予的董事会职责，推动公司高质量可持续发展，有效地保障公司 和全体股东的合法权益。 一、2024年公司经营情况 国家发改委公布《产业结构调整指导目录(2024年本)》，将物业服务纳入"鼓 励类-商务服务业"，国家对行业重新定位和政策调整使"物业服务"内容更为 细化、发展 ...