Core Insights - The Zhenjiang Intermediate Court emphasizes the importance of executing enterprise-related cases to support high-quality economic and social development in 2025, balancing "legal enforcement" with "civilized goodwill" [1][2] - A total of 8,306 enterprise-related cases were concluded in 2025, with an execution amount of 3.562 billion yuan [1] - The court aims to reduce the cost for creditors in realizing their claims and minimize the impact of enforcement measures on normal business operations [1] Group 1: Execution of Enterprise Cases - In 2025, the court executed 8,306 cases with a total amount of 3.562 billion yuan [1] - The court adopted "active sealing and active deduction" methods to lessen the impact of enforcement on business operations [1] - A pre-penalty mechanism was established, resulting in 27 cases of proactive compliance or settlement [1] Group 2: Credit and Debt Management - The court enhanced execution and reconciliation efforts, with 2,796 enterprises reaching settlements with creditors this year [1] - A credit repair mechanism was improved, assisting 241 dishonest enterprises in restoring their credit [2] - The number of enterprises listed as dishonest debtors decreased by 33.44% year-on-year [2] Group 3: Bankruptcy and Debt Resolution - The court successfully rescued 39 enterprises through bankruptcy reorganization and reconciliation procedures [2] - The execution of cases involving government arrears to small and medium-sized enterprises was strengthened, resolving 8 cases [2] - External supervision was reinforced, with 38 representatives from various organizations participating in enterprise execution activities [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Baoji Weibein Court has focused on building an execution service center to enhance judicial efficiency and service quality through comprehensive reforms in four key areas: optimizing convenience measures, improving execution quality, deepening multi-party governance, and strengthening source governance [1] Group 1: Convenience and Service Quality - The court has established a "one-stop" service model to meet public judicial needs, integrating seven functions including case filing and information inquiry [3] - A strict reception system has been implemented to ensure efficient and standardized responses, enhancing the foundation of service [3] - The center has received over 6,000 visitors, processed more than 1,000 effective execution leads, and conducted over 90 sessions of public inquiries, significantly improving public satisfaction [3] Group 2: Efficient Execution System - A professional team has been created to enhance case handling efficiency through specialized groups for preservation, centralized control, and rapid execution [4] - The court has optimized case acceptance and task assignment mechanisms to reduce the burden on frontline case handlers [4] - A rapid response mechanism has been established, ensuring property control within 24 hours and case processing within three working days [4] Group 3: Multi-Party Governance - The court has integrated various resources to enhance collaboration, transitioning from isolated efforts to coordinated governance [5] - A collaborative mechanism with police, civil affairs, social security, and tax departments has been strengthened to improve the handling of complex cases [5] - Regular meetings and joint supervision have effectively prevented over 90 potential petition cases and resolved more than 20 substantive issues [5] Group 4: Source Governance - The court has implemented a dual-track mechanism for pre-execution supervision, enhancing compliance awareness among parties involved [6] - A pre-litigation mediation system has been established to streamline dispute resolution before formal case filing [6] - The pre-execution supervision mechanism has covered over 85% of cases eligible for compliance, leading to a significant reduction in new case filings and a notable increase in public trust [6]