生态环境部日前发布《关于2025年下半年环评信用管理对象列入"黑名单"情况的通报》，两名环评编制 人员因所编制的环境影响报告存在严重质量问题，被禁止从业五年并列入环境影响评价失信"黑名单"。 通过对环评编制单位和从业人员实行信用管理，有效维护了环评服务市场秩序。 统一的全国信用平台是确保信用监管结果落到实处的关键。在环评信用管理上，生态环境部建设了统一 的环境影响评价信用平台，确保失信人员信息全国可查、失信人员无所遁形。笔者建议，要积极推进全 国监测信用大平台建设，实现监测失信信息一网共享、一体运用，确保信用管理落到实处。此外，还要 建立失信信息修复制度。近期国家发改委发布的《信用修复管理办法》在强调失信惩戒的同时，更加注 重失信行为的动态管理，促进失信主体积极改善自身信用状况。可对照当前信用管理动态化、监管差异 化的要求，同步明确失信修复机制，将恶意违法与管理过失区分开来，将拒不履职者与积极修复者区分 开来，积极营造"失信者人恶之，守信者人敬之，诚信者人爱之"良好氛围，推进第三方服务市场健康有 序发展。 当前，环评信用管理模式已成为行政处罚、刑事制裁的有效补充。与行政处罚处理具体违法行为人不 同，环评信用管 ...

日前，《建设项目环境影响评价分类管理名录》（以下简称《环评名录》）、《固定污染源排污许可分 类管理名录》（以下简称《排污许可名录》）修订同步公开征求意见，引发行业热议。 记者注意到，上述两份名录同步修订，进一步在形式、内容和管理类别上实现了统一，不仅释放了环评 进一步精简、排污许可进一步优化的信号，也反映了二者深入衔接融合的路径，更折射出我国全链条环 境管理改革的深化方向。 打破制度壁垒，贯通生态环境管理全过程 所谓全链条环境管理，简言之，就是贯通建设项目事前源头预防、事中事后监管的全过程。 在这一体系中，生态环境分区管控与规划环评、项目环评共同构成了生态环境源头预防体系，而排污许 可、执法监管系统则构成了项目事中事后监管体系。几项制度环环相扣，贯穿了生态环境管理的全生命 周期。 长期以来，环境管理制度中存在"单点不成线，独木难成林"的现象。生态环境分区管控、规划环评、项 目环评同为源头预防体系的一环，均关注项目准入、污染防治和污染物排放要求，但侧重点、关注尺度 有所不同；而项目环评与排污许可均为污染物排放管控的重要制度，但也存在管理目标和重点内容的差 异。各项制度如果缺乏顺畅衔接，便难以发挥最佳效力。 自生 ...

Core Insights - The application of a Taobao-style evaluation system in the environmental impact assessment (EIA) sector in Wuyi County, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province aims to promote the healthy development of environmental assessment intermediary services [1][2][3] Group 1: Implementation of Evaluation System - Wuyi County has implemented a transparent evaluation mechanism for EIA institutions, with 29 agencies participating and their evaluation information publicly available on local government websites and administrative service windows [1] - The evaluation system is designed to combat issues such as low-quality services and fraudulent practices among EIA institutions, which have proliferated following the cancellation of qualification approvals [1][2] Group 2: Evaluation Mechanism - The county has established a closed-loop evaluation ecosystem based on "information disclosure—multi-party evaluation—credit rewards and penalties," creating a transparent market for EIA services [2] - A "five-star scoring + multi-dimensional evaluation" model has been introduced, involving enterprises, experts, and regulatory bodies to assess EIA institutions across various dimensions such as service efficiency and professional standards [2] Group 3: Regulatory Measures - Wuyi County has implemented strict measures against non-compliant institutions, including market bans and an "emergency mechanism" that suspends order-taking qualifications after three negative evaluations in a quarter [2] - The county continues to enhance its management system through rigorous industry entry standards, classification and grading reviews, regular inspections, and follow-up visits [2]