Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against uniQure N.V. related to alleged securities fraud, with a deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status by April 13, 2026 [1]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased uniQure securities between September 24, 2025, and October 31, 2025 [1]. - Allegations include that the design of uniQure's Pivotal Study was not fully approved by the FDA and that the company downplayed the likelihood of needing to delay its Biologics License Application (BLA) timeline due to additional studies [1]. Company Disclosure - On November 3, 2025, uniQure disclosed that the FDA no longer agreed that data from Phase I/II studies of AMT-130 would be adequate for BLA submission, leading to uncertainty regarding the BLA submission timeline [1]. - Following this disclosure, uniQure's share price fell by $33.40, approximately 49.33%, from $67.69 on October 31, 2025, to $34.29 on November 3, 2025 [1].

Investor Notice: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of the Snowflake Inc. Class Action LawsuitFeb 25, 2026 2:44 PM Eastern Standard Time# Investor Notice: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of the Snowflake Inc. Class Action LawsuitShare---SAN DIEGO--([BUSINESS WIRE])-- [Robbins LLP] informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW) Class A common stock between June 27, 2023 and February 28, 2024. Snowflake is a software compa ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Navan, Inc. (NASDAQ: NAVN) for alleged securities fraud related to its initial public offering (IPO) on October 31, 2025, where approximately 36.9 million shares were sold at $25.00 per share [1] Group 1: Company Financials and Performance - Navan reported a significant increase in sales and marketing expenses, reaching nearly $95 million, which is a 39% increase from $68.5 million in the previous quarter [1] - Following the announcement of the increased expenses and the resignation of the CFO just six weeks post-IPO, Navan's stock price dropped by $1.74, or 11.9%, closing at $12.90 per share on December 16, 2025 [1] - The stock has continued to decline, trading as low as $9.20 per share, representing over a 63% decrease from its IPO price of $25 [1] Group 2: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement issued during the IPO contained materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's business and operations [1] - Specifically, it is claimed that the company did not disclose the substantial increase in sales and marketing expenses necessary to sustain revenue growth, which misled investors regarding the company's financial health [1]

Core Viewpoint - NuScale Power Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading investors regarding its commercialization strategy and the capabilities of its partner, ENTRA1 Energy LLC, which lacked significant experience in nuclear power generation [1][1][1] Summary by Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - Investors who purchased NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025, and November 6, 2025, can seek to be lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit by April 20, 2026 [1] - The lawsuit, titled Truedson v. NuScale Power Corporation, claims violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by NuScale and its executives [1] Allegations Against NuScale - The lawsuit alleges that NuScale made false or misleading statements about ENTRA1's capabilities, failing to disclose that ENTRA1 had no significant experience in building or operating nuclear power projects [1][1] - It is claimed that NuScale's reliance on ENTRA1 for commercialization exposed the company to undisclosed risks, including potential delays and regulatory challenges [1] Financial Impact - On November 6, 2025, NuScale reported a dramatic increase in general and administrative expenses, which rose over 3,000% to $519 million from $17 million in the previous year, primarily due to a $495 million payment to ENTRA1 [1] - The company's quarterly net loss surged to $532 million, up from $46 million in the prior year, following the announcement of the TVA agreement [1] - Analysts questioned NuScale's management about ENTRA1's qualifications during a conference call, leading to a more than 12% decline in NuScale's Class A share price over two days [1]

Enphase Energy, Inc. Notice of April 20, 2026 Application Deadline for Class Action Lawsuit - Contact Lewis Kahn, Esq. at Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC, Before Application DeadlineFeb 20, 2026 11:58 AM Eastern Standard Time# Enphase Energy, Inc. Notice of April 20, 2026 Application Deadline for Class Action Lawsuit - Contact Lewis Kahn, Esq. at Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC, Before Application DeadlineShare---NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS--([BUSINESS WIRE])-- [Kahn Swick & Foti], LLC ("KSF†) and KSF partner, former Attorney G ...

CLASS ACTION?]][Kirby McInerney LLP] is a New York-based plaintiffs' law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm's efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP's [website].This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.## ContactsKirby ...

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential claims on behalf of investors of Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) regarding possible recovery of losses under federal securities laws following a significant stock price decline after the company's earnings call [1][1]. Investigation Background - On December 9, 2025, Phreesia's stock price dropped approximately 25% after the company updated its fiscal 2026 revenue guidance during its third quarter earnings call [1][1]. - The investigation focuses on whether Phreesia's executive officers complied with federal securities laws, which may have implications for investor losses [1][1]. Company Profile - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder-rights law firm with multiple offices across the United States, specializing in securities class action lawsuits and representing both individual and institutional investors [1][1]. - The firm has a notable track record, having recovered approximately $90.725 million for clients in cases where it served as lead or co-lead counsel, and has been recognized as a top plaintiffs' securities law firm in the U.S. [1][1].

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a securities fraud class action lawsuit due to significant losses incurred by investors following its IPO and subsequent financial disclosures that revealed a substantial increase in credit loss provisions [1] Group 1: Company Overview - Klarna Group plc conducted its IPO on September 10, 2025, selling 34.3 million shares at $40 per share [1] - Following the IPO, the company's stock price has significantly declined, closing at $31.63 per share on November 18, 2025, after a 9.3% drop due to negative financial results [1] Group 2: Financial Performance - In its third quarter 2025 financial results, Klarna reported a 39% increase in its provision for credit losses, attributed to changes in market and product mix, particularly an increased share of the U.S. market in its Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) [1] Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The class action lawsuit alleges that Klarna's management made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business and operations, particularly underestimating the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [1] - Investors who acquired Klarna securities in connection with the IPO have until February 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit [1]

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is reminding investors of F5, Inc. about the deadline for a securities class action lawsuit, which is set for February 17, 2026, due to allegations of misleading statements related to a significant security breach affecting the company's capabilities [1] Group 1: Company Overview - F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) is facing a federal securities class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal securities laws by making false or misleading statements regarding its security capabilities [1] - The lawsuit claims that F5 was experiencing a significant security breach that impacted its ability to secure client data, which was not disclosed to investors [1] Group 2: Financial Impact - On October 27, 2025, F5 reported fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 results that fell significantly below market growth expectations for fiscal 2026, largely attributed to the security breach [1] - Following the announcement, F5's stock price dropped from $290.41 per share on October 27, 2025, to $258.76 per share by October 29, 2025, marking a decline of 10.9% in just two days [1] Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The deadline for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit is February 17, 2026, and any member of the class can move the court to serve as lead plaintiff [1] - Faruqi & Faruqi encourages individuals with information regarding F5's conduct, including whistleblowers and former employees, to come forward [1]

Core Viewpoint - Halper Sadeh LLC is investigating whether Masimo Corporation is obtaining a fair price for its shareholders in the proposed sale to Danaher Corporation for $180.00 per share in cash [1]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation focuses on whether Masimo and its board of directors violated federal securities laws and/or breached fiduciary duties by failing to obtain the best possible price for shareholders [1]. - Concerns include the fairness of the sales process and potential conflicts of interest that may limit superior competing offers [1]. - Halper Sadeh LLC may seek increased consideration, additional disclosures, or other relief and benefits for shareholders [1]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Halper Sadeh LLC represents investors globally who have experienced securities fraud and corporate misconduct, recovering millions on behalf of defrauded investors [1]. - The firm operates on a contingent fee basis, meaning shareholders would not be responsible for out-of-pocket legal fees or expenses [1].