NEW YORK, Aug. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Neogen Corporation (NASDAQ: NEOG). Shareholders who purchased shares of NEOG during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery. CONTACT US HERE: https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/neogen-corporation-loss-submission-form/?id=163679&from=3 CLASS PERIOD: January ...

Scottsdale, Arizona, Aug. 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Warnock Mackinlay Law is addressing an increasing volume of complex personal injury and wrongful death claims arising from commercial truck accidents, fatal collisions, and food delivery-related crashes across Chandler, Mesa, and Glendale. As these Arizona cities face greater traffic congestion and rising delivery service activity, the legal challenges associated with severe and fatal roadway incidents have grown in complexity. Warnock Law expands pers ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance and statistics of companies listed on the ChiNext board under the registration system, highlighting the number of IPOs, total fundraising amounts, and rankings of various institutions involved in the IPO process [2]. Group 1: IPO Statistics - As of August 24, 2025, there are 584 companies listed on the ChiNext board since the implementation of the registration system, with a total fundraising amount of 552.96 billion yuan [2]. - The number of IPOs per year is as follows: 63 in 2020, 197 in 2021, 147 in 2022, 115 in 2023, 38 in 2024, and 24 in 2025 to date [2]. Group 2: Underwriting Institutions Performance - A total of 64 underwriting institutions provided IPO services for the 584 ChiNext companies, resulting in 585 total transactions [3]. - The top five underwriting institutions by number of transactions are: 1. Guotai Junan: 59 transactions 2. CITIC Securities: 53 transactions 3. CITIC Jianzhong: 50 transactions 4. Huatai United and Guolian Minsheng: 37 transactions each [3][4]. Group 3: Legal Services Performance - A total of 68 law firms provided legal services for the IPOs of the 584 ChiNext companies [7]. - The top five law firms by number of transactions are: 1. Beijing Zhonglun: 70 transactions 2. Shanghai Jintiancheng: 51 transactions 3. Beijing King & Wood Mallesons: 40 transactions 4. Beijing Guofeng, Beijing Deheng, and Guangdong Xinda: 37 transactions each [7][8]. Group 4: Accounting Firms Performance - A total of 31 accounting firms provided auditing services for the IPOs of the 584 ChiNext companies [12]. - The top five accounting firms by number of transactions are: 1. Tianjian: 113 transactions 2. Lixin: 88 transactions 3. Rongcheng: 68 transactions 4. Dahua: 44 transactions 5. Zhonghui: 37 transactions [12][13].

NEW YORK, Aug. 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ:SMTC) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint that was filed against Semtech on February 20, 2025 with a Class Period from August 27, 2024 to February 7, 2025. Our investigation concerns whether the board of directors of Semtech have breached their fiduciary duties to the company. The ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Vestis Corporation during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on August 8, 2025, and the potential for compensation without out-of-pocket costs [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Vestis Corporation, and investors who wish to serve as lead plaintiffs must act by August 8, 2025 [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Vestis provided misleading statements about its business growth and strategic initiatives, which ultimately led to investor damages when the truth was revealed [4]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Vestis Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements and failure to meet growth expectations [1][3]. Allegations and Financial Impact - The allegations state that Vestis Corporation provided overly positive statements while concealing material adverse facts about its business growth capabilities [3]. - On May 7, 2025, Vestis announced disappointing financial results for Q2 2025, withdrew its revenue guidance for the full fiscal year, and provided lower-than-expected guidance for Q3 2025, attributing the poor performance to "lost business in excess of new business" and "lower adds over stops" [3]. - Following the announcement, Vestis' stock price plummeted from $8.71 per share on May 6, 2025, to $5.44 per share on May 7, 2025, marking a decline of approximately 37.54% in one day [3]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as May 2, 2024, to May 6, 2025, and shareholders are encouraged to register for participation [3][4]. - The deadline for shareholders to seek lead plaintiff status is August 8, 2025, and there is no cost to participate in the case [4]. Firm's Commitment - The Gross Law Firm emphasizes its mission to protect investors' rights and ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices [5].

Core Viewpoint - In the first seven months of 2025, A-shares saw 59 companies listed, a year-on-year increase of 18.00%, with a total fundraising net amount of 544.21 billion yuan, up 63.83% from the previous year [2] Group 1: Listing and Fundraising - A total of 59 new companies were listed, comprising 14 on the Shanghai Main Board, 8 on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, 8 on the Shenzhen Main Board, 22 on the Growth Enterprise Market, and 7 on the Beijing Stock Exchange [2] - The net fundraising amount of these companies reached 544.21 billion yuan, compared to 332.18 billion yuan in the same period last year [2] Group 2: Fees Charged by Intermediaries - The total fees charged by IPO intermediaries for these 59 companies amounted to 43.90 billion yuan, with underwriting and sponsorship fees at 30.22 billion yuan, legal fees at 4.48 billion yuan, and audit fees at 9.20 billion yuan [2] - The ranking of underwriting and sponsorship fees by board is as follows: Growth Enterprise Market, Shanghai Main Board, Sci-Tech Innovation Board, Shenzhen Main Board, and Beijing Stock Exchange [3] Group 3: Average Fees by Board - The average underwriting and sponsorship fee is highest in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board at 68.96 million yuan, while the lowest is in the Beijing Stock Exchange at 22.63 million yuan [6] - The average legal fee is highest in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board at 8.30 million yuan, and the lowest in the Beijing Stock Exchange at 3.63 million yuan [6] - The average audit fee is highest in the Shanghai Main Board at 21.17 million yuan, and the lowest in the Beijing Stock Exchange at 5.29 million yuan [6] Group 4: Top Intermediaries - CITIC Securities ranked first in total underwriting and sponsorship fees at 3.28 billion yuan, followed by Guotai Junan and CITIC Jianzhong at 3.28 billion yuan and 3.17 billion yuan respectively [8] - The top three law firms by total fees are Shanghai Jintiancheng, Beijing Zhonglun, and Zhejiang Tiance, with total fees of 66.14 million yuan, 46.18 million yuan, and 35.24 million yuan respectively [11] - The top three accounting firms by total fees are Rongcheng, Tianjian, and Ernst & Young Huaming, with total fees of 1.77 billion yuan, 1.53 billion yuan, and 1.33 billion yuan respectively [14]

Core Viewpoint - Neogen Corporation (NASDAQ: NEOG) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its integration with the Food Safety Division of 3M Company, which misled investors about the progress of the integration [3]. Group 1: Allegations and Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from January 5, 2023, to June 3, 2025 [3]. - Defendants allegedly downplayed inefficiencies arising from the integration and assured investors of their commitment to resolving these issues quickly [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by September 16, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. Group 2: Law Firm Information - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [5].

作者丨律新社研究员 方佳柠 出品丨律新社研究中心 未来已来，唯变不变，Web3.0技术狂奔，法律如何兜底？ Web3.0时代以用户赋权导向和去中心化架构为核心特征，以区块链、加密货币、智能合约、去中心化自治组织（DAO）为关键要素，正推动着法律服务需 求与边界的重构。 2025年7月18日早盘交易时段，比特币价格经历震荡上行，最终突破12万美元大关，年内累计涨幅约20%；以太坊价格涨幅亦超过7%，成功突破3600美元， 创下当年1月以来的最高纪录。[1]作为Web3.0生态的"燃料""血液"，加密货币的迅猛发展为Web3.0生态提供了强有力的经济基础和动力支持。Web3.0时代变 革则为法律服务市场带来了极其复杂的技术挑战与前所未有的业务机遇。 2025年5月，律新社研究中心正式启动《精品法律服务品牌指南（2025）：商业犯罪领域》调研，与多名商业犯罪领域律师展开深入交流，重点探讨了 Web3.0时代背景下商业犯罪法律服务面临的新兴挑战、发展机遇及其应对策略。 ◎ 危：溯源不能、管辖不定、规制不及 ◎ 机：辩护空间、合规业务、技术赋能 ◎ 策：固本强技、破壁协作、共治网络 01/Web3.0治理之危挑战与困局 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the development and current status of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board (STAR Market) in China, marking its sixth anniversary with a total of 589 listed companies and providing insights into the performance of various underwriting institutions, law firms, and accounting firms involved in IPO services. Group 1: STAR Market Overview - As of July 22, the STAR Market has 589 listed companies, with the number of new listings per year as follows: 70 in 2019, 143 in 2020, 162 in 2021, 124 in 2022, 67 in 2023, 15 in 2024, and 8 from 2025 to present [1]. Group 2: Underwriting Institutions Performance - A total of 53 underwriting institutions have handled the IPOs for the 589 STAR Market companies. The top five institutions by the number of IPOs are: 1. Guotai Junan: 95 IPOs 2. CITIC Securities: 84 IPOs 3. CITIC Jianzhong: 56 IPOs 4. CICC: 53 IPOs 5. Huatai United: 51 IPOs [2][3]. Group 3: Law Firms Performance - There are 67 law firms that provided legal services for the IPOs of the 589 STAR Market companies. The top five law firms are: 1. Shanghai Jintiancheng: 62 cases 2. Beijing Zhonglun: 56 cases 3. Beijing Deheng: 46 cases 4. Beijing Jindu: 36 cases 5. Beijing Guofeng: 35 cases [7]. Group 4: Accounting Firms Performance - A total of 29 accounting firms provided audit services for the IPOs of the 589 STAR Market companies. The top five accounting firms are: 1. Tianjian: 108 cases 2. Lixin: 88 cases 3. Rongcheng: 68 cases 4. Tianzhi International: 41 cases 5. Dahua: 35 cases [8].