And right now we are 2 minutes away from the end of the trading day. Romaine Bostick here with Katie Greifeld taking you through to that closing bell. That's a global simulcast.We're joined now by Carol Massar and Tim Steinbeck. Welcome to our audiences across all of our Bloomberg platforms, television, radio and our partnership with you to appear on the seventh day of a rally in the S&P 500 and the biggest gainer. This will be music to your ears.Carol Massar is an alcohol and wine company, Brown-Forman lea ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights that sportsbook profits tend to increase when favored teams lose, which can positively impact companies like DraftKings and Flutter Entertainment [1] Group 2 - The upset victory of UConn over Duke serves as a case study illustrating the dynamics of sportsbook profitability [1] - The article suggests that unexpected outcomes in sports betting can lead to higher revenues for sportsbooks [1]

Core Insights - The introduction of the bipartisan Senate bill, the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, creates a regulatory moat that favors established companies like DraftKings and Flutter by banning sports-related contracts on disruptive platforms [1][4][16] - The bill neutralizes the competitive threat posed by prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket, which had previously operated in a regulatory gray area [2][3][4] Company Impact - Shares of DraftKings and Flutter surged significantly following the legislative news, indicating strong investor confidence and a positive market reaction [5][6] - The removal of disruptive competitors enhances the long-term profitability outlook for DraftKings and Flutter, solidifying their market leadership [6][10][17] - DraftKings' stock price spike and bullish options market activity suggest a strong belief among investors in the company's growth potential [8][9][11] Market Dynamics - The bill effectively builds a protective barrier around DraftKings and Flutter, reducing competitive pressure and validating their state-licensed business models [7][17] - Flutter, as the parent company of FanDuel, stands to gain significantly from a more consolidated market, leveraging its brand recognition and operational scale [12][14][15] Analyst Sentiment - Wall Street analysts show strong support for both DraftKings and Flutter, with the majority rating DraftKings as a Buy or Outperform and Flutter receiving a high average price target indicating substantial upside potential [11][15]

Core Viewpoint - A bipartisan bill in the U.S. Senate aims to ban sports betting on prediction markets, which would favor established betting platforms like DraftKings and Flutter Entertainment [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative Impact - The proposed legislation specifically targets prediction-market exchanges such as Kalshi and Polymarket, which allow yes-or-no wagers on sports outcomes, and would also prohibit casino-style games on these platforms [2]. - Co-sponsor Sen. Adam Schiff expressed concerns that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is undermining state consumer protections and tribal sovereignty by regulating these markets [2]. - Sen. John Curtis highlighted fears regarding the exposure of young people to addictive sports betting and casino-style gaming, advocating for state control over these activities rather than federal oversight [3]. Group 2: Market Competition - DraftKings and FanDuel have launched their own prediction markets in response to competition from platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, with DraftKings covering various topics including sports and politics [4]. - Robinhood Markets has also entered the prediction market space, launching its platform that includes sports betting [5]. Group 3: Legal Challenges - The CFTC has argued that states lack regulatory authority over prediction markets, while Nevada has secured a temporary restraining order against Kalshi for offering sports-related contracts [6]. - Arizona has filed criminal charges against Kalshi's parent companies, alleging they operate an illegal gambling business without a license [6]. Group 4: Stock Performance - DraftKings shares rose by 2.1% but remain down nearly 30% year-to-date, with a Composite Rating dropping from 83 to 31 over six months [8]. - Flutter Entertainment's stock increased by 5% but is down over 48% for the year, with a Composite Rating of 11 [9]. - Rush Street Interactive's shares jumped 4.8%, reaching their highest level since late September, exiting a buy zone from a previous entry point [10].

Group 1: Core Insights - Flutter stock is experiencing significant upward momentum, with shares trading 10.29% higher at $115.60 [5] - The rise in Flutter's stock price is attributed to proposed legislation that could limit competition from prediction-market platforms, benefiting traditional sportsbook operators [4] Group 2: Legislative Context - A bipartisan group of senators is introducing legislation to prohibit CFTC-regulated entities from listing contracts tied to sporting events, targeting platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket [2] - The bill aims to eliminate what is described as a "backdoor" that violates state consumer protections and generates no public revenue, addressing concerns about exposure to sports betting [3] - The proposed legislation seeks to ban "casino-style games" on prediction-market platforms, which could further reduce competition for traditional sportsbooks [3]

Core Insights - Sports betting stocks are not experiencing a boost from the NCAA tournament, indicating a potential stagnation in the market [1] - There are ongoing concerns regarding competition from platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, which may be impacting investor confidence in traditional sports betting stocks [1] Industry Summary - The performance of sports betting stocks is currently underwhelming despite the NCAA tournament, which is typically a high-traffic period for betting [1] - The emergence of alternative betting platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket is raising competitive concerns, suggesting that traditional sports betting companies may face challenges in maintaining market share [1]

MLB Names Polymarket Official Partner as Legal Uncertainty PersistsMLB has named Polymarket its official prediction market exchange and signed an MOU with the CFTC to establish an information-sharing and integrity framework. Regulatory uncertainty remains, with the American Gaming Association arguing such markets fall under state-level sports betting rules. The agreement includes a termination clause if courts rule prediction markets violate state laws. ...

Core Viewpoint - The CFTC Chairman Michael Selig indicated that the definition of a commodity under the Commodity Exchange Act is broad, encompassing various underlying assets, including sports event contracts, which may be treated as federally regulated swaps rather than state-regulated gambling [1]. Group 1: CFTC's Position on Sports Betting - Selig emphasized a distinction between prediction market exchanges and sportsbooks, stating that swaps structured on commodities and traded on CFTC-registered exchanges are not considered gambling [2]. - He described sportsbooks as lacking essential features like an order book and clearing house, indicating that transactions occur directly with a bookie rather than through a market mechanism [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Landscape and Market Implications - Selig referred to prediction markets as "truth machines" and highlighted the CFTC's ongoing efforts to combat fraud and manipulation in these markets since the 1990s [3]. - Recent enforcement actions, such as against a MrBeast employee for insider trading, demonstrate that the CFTC is actively regulating these markets [3]. - An Ohio federal judge ruled against Kalshi, asserting that the CFTC does not have exclusive jurisdiction over sports contracts, while a Tennessee court had a conflicting ruling earlier [5]. - Selig's comments suggest that the CFTC will continue to pursue federal control, which could allow prediction markets to legally offer sports betting nationwide without needing state licenses [5]. Group 3: Market Performance and Valuations - DKNG has seen a 30% decline year-to-date, currently trading around $26, while FLUT has dropped 50% in 2026, trading around $110 [4]. - Both stocks experienced declines following reports of Kalshi and Polymarket entering fundraising discussions at $20 billion valuations, which is approximately double their late-2025 figures [4]. - Sports betting constituted 80% of Kalshi's all-time notional volume, indicating its significant role in the market [4].

RT Ignas | DeFi (@DefiIgnas)Google Search says Kalshi is a sports betting company.Not a prediction market - betting company. Basically gambling.The framing matters and seems that PMs are struggling with narrative controlOhio judge just ruled that Kalshi is sports betting and must adhere to state law. https://t.co/zjjhCWf6nJ ...

Google Search says Kalshi is a sports betting company.Not a prediction market - betting company. Basically gambling.The framing matters and seems that PMs are struggling with narrative controlOhio judge just ruled that Kalshi is sports betting and must adhere to state law. https://t.co/zjjhCWf6nJ ...