既然张亚中教授已经被主张"台独"的民进党和国民党内的"反 动派"打成积极推进统一"红统"分子，那就别装了，干脆把这 份备忘录修改一番吧。 作者： 王义伟 封图：本报资料室 正在进行的国民党主席选举，参选人之一张亚中教授的表现给人印象深刻，主要体现在三个方面。 方也认知到，本备忘录的签署有助于未来两岸官方正式结束敌对状态、签署和平协议。 第一，准确阐释了"九二共识"的内涵。 在电视辩论中，张亚中问另一位参选人罗智强什么是"九二共识"。罗说"九二共识"就是"一中各表"。张亚中说，罗错了，"九二共识"的真正内涵有两 个，一个是一个中国原则，一个是追求统一。 第二，张亚中炮轰朱立伦、赵少康、郝龙斌等人密谋党主席选举，为此和赵少康公开骂战。这是他再一次挑战国民党积弊已久的酱缸文化。 第三，关于两岸关系，张亚中表示如果自己当选国民党主席，将立即恢复"国统纲领"，并代表国民党和大陆谈判，力争任内签署《创造两岸和平备忘 录》。 张亚中准确阐释"九二共识" ，挞伐国民党密室政治，勇气可嘉！ 关于他的两岸和平备忘录，笔者的感觉是，不但大陆方面，就是在台湾岛内，不少人对这份文件也是只闻其名、未见真容。大家都知道他编撰了这份文 件， ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing Kuomintang (KMT) chairperson election has highlighted the impressive performance of candidate Zhang Yazhong, particularly in his interpretation of the "1992 Consensus," his criticism of internal party politics, and his proposals for cross-strait relations [1][2]. Group 1: Interpretation of "1992 Consensus" - Zhang Yazhong accurately articulated the essence of the "1992 Consensus," emphasizing that it consists of two main components: the principle of one China and the pursuit of unification [2]. - In a debate, Zhang challenged another candidate's understanding of the "1992 Consensus," asserting that it is not merely "one China, each with its own interpretation" as claimed [2]. Group 2: Criticism of Internal Party Politics - Zhang publicly criticized prominent KMT figures, including Zhu Lilun and Zhao Shaokang, for allegedly conspiring in the chairperson election, marking a challenge to the long-standing "jar culture" within the party [2][3]. Group 3: Proposals for Cross-Strait Relations - Zhang expressed his intention to restore the "National Unification Guidelines" if elected as KMT chairperson and to negotiate with the mainland, aiming to sign a "Cross-Strait Peace Memorandum" during his term [2][3]. - The proposed "Cross-Strait Peace Memorandum" emphasizes peace as a fundamental value and aims to end the current hostile state between the two sides, promoting equality and cooperation [5][6]. Group 4: Content of the Proposed Memorandum - The memorandum outlines several key points, including mutual recognition of national identity, opposition to separatism, and the commitment to peaceful resolution of disputes without the use of force [7][9][12]. - It also suggests establishing permanent representative offices and acknowledges differing views on political arrangements post-unification [13][14]. Group 5: Reactions and Critiques - The memorandum has received limited attention in Taiwan, with both pro-independence and pro-unification factions expressing dissatisfaction with its content [15]. - Critics argue that the memorandum lacks references to "Republic of China" and "Three Principles of the People," suggesting it may be an attempt by the KMT to impose its agenda on the Taiwanese populace [15][16].