Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between outdoor brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang to launch an art fireworks display in the Himalayas has sparked controversy, leading to public apologies and commitments to environmental assessments [1][2][3] Group 1: Company Response - Arc'teryx issued an apology on September 21, acknowledging that merely apologizing is insufficient and expressing their responsibility to cooperate with government oversight and environmental assessments [1] - The company plans to invite third-party environmental organizations to conduct rigorous and transparent evaluations of the project's ecological impact [1] Group 2: Artist's Statement - Cai Guoqiang expressed deep apologies for the incident through a short video platform on the same day as Arc'teryx's apology [2] Group 3: Local Government and Environmental Concerns - The local government in Shigatse, Tibet, formed an investigation team to verify the situation following public concern after the fireworks video was released on September 20 [3] - The local ecological environment bureau stated that the event's procedures were compliant and that there was no ecological damage reported [3] - The fireworks display, titled "Ascension," took place in a high-altitude area averaging over 4600 meters, raising environmental concerns regarding fireworks in such a sensitive ecosystem [3]

Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between outdoor brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang for an art fireworks display in the Himalayas has sparked significant controversy regarding environmental impact and the appropriateness of such events in ecologically sensitive areas [1][4]. Group 1: Environmental Concerns - Experts have raised alarms about the ecological fragility of the Tibetan Plateau, emphasizing that any damage to the environment could take decades or even centuries to recover [4]. - The fireworks display, lasting less than an hour, could have multiple environmental impacts, but a thorough assessment is needed to determine the extent of the damage [4][5]. - The event has been criticized for prioritizing artistic expression and brand promotion over the protection of shared natural resources [4]. Group 2: Responses and Apologies - Both the artist and the brand have issued apologies following the backlash, acknowledging the negative impact on vegetation, wildlife, and the ecosystem [5][10]. - Arc'teryx has committed to conducting a comprehensive environmental impact assessment in collaboration with third-party environmental organizations and has pledged to take corrective actions based on the findings [10]. - The brand has expressed a commitment to accelerate its environmental protection initiatives in the region and to engage with the public for ongoing feedback [10].

Core Points - The "Ascendant Dragon" fireworks show, created by outdoor brand Arc'teryx in collaboration with artist Cai Guoqiang, has sparked controversy after its video was released online on September 20 [4] - The local government in Shigatse, Tibet, has formed an investigation team to assess the situation and will handle the matter according to the findings [1] Group 1 - The fireworks event took place in the Himalayan region, specifically in the Hotong Township of Shigatse City, at an average altitude of over 4600 meters [4] - The event featured 145 fan-shaped fireworks, creating a 3000-meter long rainbow display in various colors [4] - The local ecological environment bureau stated that the event's procedures were compliant and that there was no ecological damage reported [4] Group 2 - The organizers claimed that the fireworks used biodegradable materials, and their emissions were verified to meet environmental standards in various regions including Japan, the US, and Europe [5] - The fireworks were classified as V-level (lowest risk level), with noise and light pollution significantly lower than traditional nighttime fireworks [5] - A comprehensive ecological protection plan was implemented, including relocating livestock and cleaning up residual materials post-event to ensure no ecological hazards remained [5]