Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the importance of transparency in the second-hand electric vehicle market, particularly regarding battery ownership and rental agreements, as the court ruled in favor of the buyer due to a significant misunderstanding about the vehicle's battery status [1][3][5]. Group 1: Case Details - A buyer, Mr. Yao, purchased an electric vehicle for 178,200 yuan but later discovered it did not come with a battery, which was a rental option requiring an additional monthly fee of 1,560 yuan [1]. - The seller, Ms. Wang, claimed she informed the platform about the battery rental status, but the platform denied this knowledge, leading to a dispute [2]. - The court found that the platform failed to disclose critical information regarding the battery rental status, which constituted a breach of duty [3][5]. Group 2: Court Ruling - The court ruled to annul the contract, stating that the battery is a core component of electric vehicles, affecting performance and safety, and the platform had a duty to ensure accurate information was provided [3][6]. - The ruling mandated that Ms. Wang refund Mr. Yao the purchase price, while the platform was ordered to return service fees and cover transportation costs [5]. - The judgment emphasized the obligation of both sellers and platforms to disclose essential vehicle information, particularly regarding battery conditions [6][8]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The case underscores the legal principle that contracts can be annulled due to significant misunderstandings, particularly when critical information is not disclosed [6]. - The ruling serves as a reminder for buyers to thoroughly understand vehicle conditions and for platforms to accurately present vehicle information to prevent disputes [8].

上海海关26日公布，装载3辆二手新能源车的集装箱卡车，23日从上海出发驶往白俄罗斯首都明斯克。 这是上海首单TIR国际公路运输出口货物，标志着上海进出口TIR国际公路运输业务双向贯通。2024年3 月6日，上海首单进口TIR国际公路运输业务在上海海关所属上海车站海关监管下落地。截至目前，上 海车站海关共监管TIR跨境运输业务3批，货值111.4万元人民币。(新华财经) ...