Core Insights - The case of a homeowner suing a property management company over the installation of a charging pile highlights the ongoing conflict between urban governance capabilities and residents' needs in the era of electric vehicles [1] - Despite a compound annual growth rate of over 50% in China's new energy vehicle production and sales over the past five years, the installation rate of charging piles in residential areas has remained around 30%, leading to an increase in civil disputes related to charging pile installation [1] Group 1 - The need to reconcile "safety" and "convenience" in the context of charging pile installations is emphasized, suggesting that a higher-level institutional design is necessary to find common ground [2] - Establishing clear standards can define the boundaries of property management's "right to refuse" and the car owner's "right to apply," which is seen as a significant step in governance [2] - Cost-sharing mechanisms are proposed, including government funding, contributions from power companies, and dynamic adjustments through charging service fees from benefiting car owners [2] Group 2 - The introduction of market-based risk management mechanisms, such as comprehensive liability insurance for charging piles, is suggested to alleviate property management's safety concerns while promoting service growth [2] - The shift in governance philosophy is highlighted, moving from a "who decides" approach to a collaborative "how to get things done" mindset, emphasizing proactive measures over reactive ones [2]