Workflow
北大未名湖湖水
icon
Search documents
二手平台公开出售清华食堂餐具,紫荆色饭碗+绿色餐勺标价88元,校方回应
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-08-25 10:26
Core Viewpoint - The sale of Tsinghua University dining utensils on second-hand platforms has sparked significant online discussion, particularly a set priced at 88 yuan, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the items being sold [1][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A seller on a second-hand platform is offering a "Tsinghua Zijing color bowl + green spoon" set for 88 yuan, claiming it provides a unique dining experience [6]. - The seller, who identifies as a Tsinghua student, confirms the availability of multiple sets and offers options for local pickup or delivery [6]. - There are additional listings for Tsinghua dining plates priced at 35 yuan [6]. Group 2: Institutional Response - Some online commenters have labeled the seller as a "thief," questioning the source of the utensils [6]. - A manager from Tsinghua's dining services confirmed that the utensils are indeed from the university's dining halls but emphasized that taking them out of the premises is against regulations [6]. - The dining hall has reported the situation to higher authorities for further action [6]. Group 3: Related Incidents - In June, bottled water labeled as "Beida Weiming Lake water" and "Tsinghua campus river water" was also found for sale online, with prices ranging from 20 yuan to nearly 100 yuan for 500 milliliters [8]. - Officials from both Tsinghua and Peking University have condemned the commercialization of campus water resources, stating it violates campus management regulations [8].
壹快评丨北大未名湖湖水被明码标价,深层次原因值得思考
第一财经· 2025-06-14 11:52
Core Viewpoint - The sale of water from Peking University's Weiming Lake has sparked significant social attention, leading to a response from university officials who emphasize the ecological value of such resources and oppose their commercialization [2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Multiple merchants on online second-hand trading platforms are selling Peking University Weiming Lake water, with prices ranging from 20 yuan to nearly 100 yuan for 500 milliliters [2]. - University officials have stated that the lake and river water are valuable ecological resources and should not be exploited for illegal profit [3]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Commentary - The promotion of the lake water as having "brain-boosting" and "wisdom-enhancing" properties has drawn ridicule, with comparisons made to absurdities in cultural phenomena, such as the obsession with the walls of Nobel laureate Mo Yan's childhood home [3]. - Legal experts and commentators have discussed the implications of such sales from property rights and environmental protection perspectives [3][4]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The incident highlights a market willing to engage in such absurdities, raising concerns about the potential influence on younger generations and the concept of "intelligence tax" [5]. - Suggestions have been made for universities to open their campuses to the public, allowing for a more genuine connection with the natural resources rather than restricting access [5].
壹快评丨北大未名湖湖水被明码标价,深层次原因值得思考
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-06-13 14:03
Group 1 - The sale of water from Peking University's Weiming Lake has become a topic of discussion, initially intended as a marketing gimmick by sellers [1][2] - Multiple sellers on online second-hand trading platforms are offering 500ml of Weiming Lake water for prices ranging from 20 yuan to nearly 100 yuan, with some claiming it enhances brain power and wisdom [2][3] - Peking University and Tsinghua University officials have stated that the water is a valuable resource for maintaining a healthy ecosystem and should not be commodified for illegal profit [1][2] Group 2 - The absurdity of selling lake water has drawn public attention, prompting the universities to issue statements through media channels [2] - The universities are taking action by contacting relevant platforms to remove these listings, emphasizing that such practices violate campus management regulations [2][3] - The phenomenon raises questions about consumer behavior, as it indicates that there are individuals willing to purchase such products, which could reflect poorly on societal values [3]