Core Points - A consumer named Ren encountered issues purchasing a computer at a high price, which led to widespread attention on the matter [2] - The consumer initially intended to buy an ASUS Tianxuan 6 Pro but was persuaded to purchase a lower-spec model at an inflated price [2] - The local market supervision bureau intervened and facilitated a resolution between the consumer and the retailer [2] Summary by Sections - **Consumer Experience** - Ren planned to buy an ASUS Tianxuan 6 Pro but was redirected to a different model due to claims of performance issues [2] - The retailer presented a price higher than the official website, leading to a payment of an additional 300 yuan [2] - **Retailer Response** - The retailer, represented by Zhang, argued that the recommended model better suited the consumer's needs and claimed the pricing was within a reasonable range [2] - Zhang admitted to using some sales tactics due to poor business performance [2] - **Resolution and Future Actions** - The retailer agreed to refund 800 yuan and provide a brand headphone as compensation after mediation [2] - The market supervision bureau indicated that further investigation into the retailer's sales practices would be conducted to prevent similar issues in the future [2]