Group 1 - The article discusses the dichotomy between men's and women's fashion, highlighting that women's clothing has undergone more radical changes since the 19th century, while men's fashion has remained stable and less imaginative [2][5] - Men's fashion is characterized by practicality, efficiency, and a clear definition of masculinity, which has led to its withdrawal from the fashion spotlight, making it more functional than fashionable [5][6] - The structure of clothing is emphasized as a critical aspect, with men's clothing often seen as a "moving house," focusing on form and function rather than decoration [4][6] Group 2 - The article suggests that fashion serves as a reflection of societal roles and personal identity, with clothing acting as a medium through which individuals express their social roles [7][8] - Women's fashion is portrayed as a dynamic field where personal attitudes and societal expectations intersect, leading to a complex relationship with self-image and morality [8][9] - The discussion includes the philosophical implications of fashion, suggesting that it is a crucial intersection between individual expression and societal norms, challenging the notion of objectivity in fashion [9]