唐鸿胪井碑
Search documents
东西问丨段勇:被日本掠夺的唐鸿胪井碑为何是中国流失国宝的“头号追索目标”?
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-10 12:49
中新社上海2月10日电 题:被日本掠夺的唐鸿胪井碑为何是中国流失国宝的"头号追索目标"? ——专访上海大学中国海外文物研究中心主任段勇教授 中新社记者 樊中华 许婧 今年年初,《唐鸿胪井碑档案文献总汇》(下称《总汇》)一书在上海发布,近120万字的史料文献让流 失日本逾百年的国宝中华唐鸿胪井碑再度引发海内外高度关注。 公元713年,唐朝鸿胪卿崔忻奉命出使渤海国,册封靺鞨(又称"靺羯")族首领大祚荣为渤海郡王。次年 返程途中,崔忻在位于今辽宁省大连市旅顺口区的黄金山下凿井两口,并在一块高近1.8米的巨石上刻 下29字碑文"敕持节宣劳靺羯使鸿胪卿崔忻井两口永为记验开元二年五月十八日",是为唐鸿胪井碑。 1904年,日俄战争在中国东北爆发。日本获胜后,于1908年将唐鸿胪井碑及碑亭掠夺回国,藏于其皇宫 专门收藏日俄战争"战利品"的建安府中并秘不示人。 2025年10月16日,上海大学中国海外文物研究中心主任、《唐鸿胪井碑档案文献总汇》主编之一段勇在 日本国会向日本外务省官员递交《总汇》初稿并敦促日本政府归还唐鸿胪井碑。受访者供图 中新社记者:《总汇》中有哪些内容是首次呈现?它的发布,对于逾百年的唐鸿胪井碑研究以及敦 ...
国宝唐鸿胪井碑追索陷入“日本迷宫”
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2026-02-08 22:53
【环球时报报道 记者 丁雅栀 邢晓婧】《唐鸿胪井碑档案文献总汇》(以下简称《总汇》)日前在上海发布,这部典籍首次完整廓清碑石"立碑—存留—被 掠—秘藏"的百年轨迹,构建起一条扎实严密、无可辩驳的证据链。然而,《环球时报》记者经过长期追踪采访发现,鉴于日方多年来的百般推诿,追索被 掠夺的中国文物之路依然布满荆棘,似乎陷入一个由沉默与逃避构筑的迷宫。但山河遗珍,长夜盼归,这场跨越世纪的归途,承载着无数人的心愿——让所 有被掠夺的文物回家。 是否接收新证据?日本宫内厅独家回应 " 不好说 " 原本位于大连旅顺的唐鸿胪井碑立于公元714年,是唐朝中央政府特使奉命册封中国东北地区少数民族靺鞨族地方政权首领,确立该地区隶属于唐王朝的重 要历史物证。1908年4月前,日本占领军以所谓日俄战争"战利品"为幌子非法拆解唐鸿胪井碑及碑亭,将其装船运至日本,献给日本天皇,至今被藏于日本 皇居"御府"之一的建安府,被许多学者称为我国"头号流失国宝"。 为追索被日本掠夺的中国文物,多年来中方与日本有识之士一道持续开展证据搜集,积极与日方交涉,推动其依法归还。日本民间团体"中国文物返还运动 推进会"(以下简称"推进会")发起人、日本律师 ...
何时“回家”
Ren Min Ri Bao Hai Wai Ban· 2026-02-01 22:49
"崔忻题刻"拓片。 "刘含芳题刻"拓片。 二十世纪初,关重忠拍摄的在旅顺原址的唐鸿胪井碑及碑亭。 唐鸿胪井碑遗址现场及文保碑。 本文配图均由上海大学中国海外文物研究中心提供 立于唐开元二年(公元714年)的唐鸿胪井碑是唐朝中央政府特使奉命册封中国东北地区少数民族靺鞨 族地方政权首领,确立该地区隶属于唐王朝的重要历史物证。但在1908年,却被以"战利品"的名义非法 运至日本,自此远离故土118年。 中国相关政府部门、中外专家学者和社会各界有识之士一直为唐鸿胪井碑回归中国而不懈努力。就在今 年1月,由上海大学中国海外文物研究中心、大连市国韵文化促进会714志愿会联合编纂的《唐鸿胪井碑 档案文献总汇》(以下简称《总汇》)在上海发布,完成唐鸿胪井碑流失日本的溯源及流转历史研究, 形成完整证据链,还原了日本以日俄战争"战利品"为由,非法劫掠唐鸿胪井碑及碑亭并将其运至日本的 事实。 这本800多页的书系统梳理了迄今存世的唐鸿胪井碑在旅顺原址及日本的图片、唐鸿胪井碑题刻拓片、 唐鸿胪井碑自诞生至被掠入日本期间的相关档案文献资料,以及20世纪以来中外学者对于唐鸿胪井碑的 研究著述,为唐鸿胪井碑的进一步研究和追索搭建起完整、系 ...
新闻周刊丨这座曾见证大唐盛世的中国国宝,日本该还了!
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2026-01-24 23:49
上海大学中国海外文物研究中心主任 段勇:当初敢起 《唐鸿胪井碑档案文献总汇》这个名字,也是因为我们有充分的信心。相信这一部书是把与唐鸿胪井 碑相关的,比如它的本体、历史,还有后世学者的研究成果,可以说都有了。 368份档案与图片,像一块块拼图,首次完整拼出了流失日本的国宝唐鸿胪井碑的前世今生。 这座曾经见证大唐盛世的国宝已被日本掠去118年。如今,遗址上仅剩一块日军1911年竖立的"鸿胪井遗迹"碑,上面的文字也只字未提掠夺的历史真相。 姬巍和本地学者一道成立了国韵文化促进会714志愿会,开展唐鸿胪井碑的研究和追索工作。1月16日,姬巍作为主编之一,和上海大学中国海外文物研究中 心联合编纂的《唐鸿胪井碑档案文献总汇》正式发布,从而完成了唐鸿胪井碑流失日本的溯源及流转历史的研究,并形成了完整的证据链条。 最近几年,"国宝文物回家"的话题一次次引发高度关注,从圆明园的兽首到子弹库帛书,每一件流失文物的回归都牵动着国人的心。 唐鸿胪井碑是一件被许多学者称为"头号流失国宝"的文物,这座有1300多年历史的石碑原来矗立于大连旅顺,记录了唐朝册封渤海国的历史,然而在1908 年,它被日军以"战利品"的名义掠走,至今仍被秘密 ...
中国海外文物研究中心主任谈流失日本唐鸿胪井碑:这是头号流失国宝
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-19 06:51
Core Viewpoint - The publication of "Tang Honglu Well Stele Archive Document Compilation" has reignited public interest in the "Tang Honglu Well Stele," which has been lost in Japan for over a century, highlighting its significant historical, political, and cultural value to China [1][11]. Group 1: Publication Details - The "Tang Honglu Well Stele Archive Document Compilation" systematically organizes all existing images, rubbings, and related documents of the stele, providing a comprehensive resource for further research and repatriation efforts [3][5]. - The book includes 63 photographs, 93 pages of original documents, 34 related articles, and 122 academic papers, totaling 11.96 million words, making it the most detailed academic compilation on the stele to date [7]. Group 2: Historical Context and Significance - The Tang Honglu Well Stele, erected in 714 AD, serves as a crucial historical artifact that confirms the governance of the northeastern region of China by the Tang Dynasty, representing a significant political and cultural symbol [3][11]. - The illegal removal of the stele by Japanese forces in 1908 is emblematic of the broader issue of cultural artifacts lost during periods of conflict and colonialism, with approximately 150 million artifacts currently held overseas, 10% of which are considered illegally obtained [11][9]. Group 3: Research and Repatriation Efforts - Recent research has clarified misconceptions regarding the timeline and circumstances of the stele's removal, identifying the specific period and location of its current status in Japan [15]. - The ongoing repatriation efforts are supported by international conventions and growing moral pressure from the global community, with recent successful returns of artifacts from countries like Germany and the UK to Nigeria [8][9]. Group 4: Future Implications - The repatriation of the Tang Honglu Well Stele is seen as a critical step towards rectifying historical injustices and fostering better relations between China and Japan, contributing to a new order of international cultural heritage exchange [17].
《唐鸿胪井碑档案文献总汇》发布 呼吁日本政府早日返还流失文物
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-16 10:50
Core Viewpoint - The publication of "The Complete Collection of Archives and Documents on the Tang Honglujing Stele" aims to provide a comprehensive resource for the study and retrieval of the Tang Honglujing Stele, which has significant historical value and is currently held in Japan [1][3]. Group 1: Publication Details - The book was released on January 16 and is a collaborative effort between Shanghai University’s Center for Chinese Overseas Cultural Heritage Studies and the Dalian Guoyun Cultural Promotion Association [1]. - It systematically compiles all existing images, rubbings, and related archival documents of the Tang Honglujing Stele from its inception until it was taken to Japan [1]. Group 2: Historical Context - The Tang Honglujing Stele, weighing over 9 tons and measuring more than 10 cubic meters, was created in 714 AD to commemorate the appointment of a local leader by the Tang Dynasty [3]. - The stele was taken to Japan during the early 20th century, specifically after the Russo-Japanese War, and has been recognized as a significant cultural artifact [4]. Group 3: Call for Action - During the book launch, a declaration was made urging the Japanese government to respect historical facts and return the stele to its country of origin, aligning with international consensus on the restitution of cultural artifacts [1].
【环时深度】听各国人士讲述被掠夺文物的回家故事
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-06-12 22:28
Core Points - The article discusses the ongoing efforts by various countries, including Egypt and Nigeria, to reclaim cultural artifacts that were looted during colonial times, highlighting the importance of these artifacts in preserving national identity and history [1][10]. Group 1: Japan's Efforts in Repatriation - A Japanese civil organization, the "China Cultural Relics Return Movement Promotion Association," is actively urging the Japanese government to return Chinese artifacts looted during historical conflicts, emphasizing the need for accountability regarding Japan's imperialist past [2][5]. - The association has documented 15,245 rare Chinese artifacts that flowed into Japan from 1895 to 1945, with estimates suggesting that over 3.6 million items were looted during this period [4][6]. - The organization has faced challenges in negotiations with Japanese institutions, receiving repeated refusals for meetings and responses regarding their requests for artifact repatriation [5][6]. Group 2: Egypt's Repatriation Successes - Egypt has successfully reclaimed over 30,000 artifacts since 2014, with recent recoveries including 25 significant items after negotiations with the United States [8][9]. - The process of repatriation involves collaboration with international authorities and legal frameworks, such as the UNESCO 1970 Convention, to facilitate the return of illegally exported cultural property [11]. - Egypt plans to establish a comprehensive database of artifacts and utilize advanced technologies like blockchain to track the provenance of cultural items [9]. Group 3: Nigeria's Cultural Heritage Recovery - Nigeria has been actively pursuing the return of looted artifacts, particularly from the Benin Kingdom, with recent successes in negotiations with Western countries [10][11]. - The Nigerian government collaborates with various agencies to create memorandums of understanding for the repatriation of cultural property, emphasizing the need for compensation for historical injustices [11]. - Civil organizations like "Open Restitution Africa" are playing a crucial role in documenting and advocating for the return of African artifacts, reshaping the narrative around cultural heritage [11].