Core Viewpoint - The investigation reveals that certain sunscreen products marketed for children do not comply with regulatory requirements, specifically lacking the "Little Gold Shield" label mandated for children's cosmetics, raising concerns about safety and compliance in the industry [1][2][3]. Group 1: Product Compliance Issues - Some sunscreen products claim to be suitable for children aged 0-12 years but do not display the required "Little Gold Shield" label, which indicates compliance with safety regulations for children's cosmetics [1][2]. - The "Algn Ailange" store has rebranded to "Xunxiang Doctor" and continues to sell products that claim to be suitable for infants, despite recommendations against using sunscreen for children under 6 months [1][3]. - The "Xunxiang Doctor" store's customer service claims that their products are suitable for all age groups, including infants, but consumer feedback shows the absence of the "Little Gold Shield" on the packaging [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Framework - Children's cosmetics in China are subject to strict regulations, requiring specific labeling and safety assessments before market entry, particularly for sunscreen products [2][4]. - The regulatory framework mandates that children's cosmetics must display the "Little Gold Shield" label on their packaging, which is currently not being adhered to by some products [2][4]. - The customer service of the stores involved has provided registration numbers for their products, but these do not guarantee that the products meet the necessary safety standards for children's use [4][5]. Group 3: Consumer Awareness and Safety - Medical professionals recommend physical sun protection methods for infants under 6 months, emphasizing the importance of avoiding sunscreen for this age group [7]. - There is a discrepancy between product marketing claims and customer service responses regarding the appropriate age for sunscreen use, leading to potential consumer confusion [5][7]. - The ongoing sale of non-compliant products raises significant concerns about consumer safety and the effectiveness of regulatory oversight in the cosmetics industry [1][6].

Summary of Cosmetic Supervision and Inspection in Laibin City Overall Inspection Results - A total of 140 batches of cosmetics were randomly sampled, with an overall pass rate of 93.57%, where 131 batches were qualified and 9 batches were unqualified [2][3] - Specific categories included: - Children's products: 21 batches, 100% pass rate - Sunscreen products: 21 batches, 85.71% pass rate (3 unqualified) - General skincare products: 56 batches, 94.64% pass rate (3 unqualified) - Hair dye products: 21 batches, 90.47% pass rate (2 unqualified) - Shampoo and bathing products: 21 batches, 95.24% pass rate (1 unqualified) [2] Handling of Unqualified Samples - The local market supervision department has initiated verification and disposal actions for the unqualified cosmetics, analyzing the reasons and notifying relevant departments [3] Detailed Information on Unqualified Products - A table was provided listing unqualified products, including details such as product name, sampling unit, inspection results, and reasons for non-compliance [3][4][5]