Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the recent U.S.-China tariff negotiations have influenced the stance of Cheung Kong (长和) regarding its port transaction, indicating a potential shift in strategy due to changing geopolitical dynamics [1][3]. - Cheung Kong's statement emphasizes that the completion of the transaction depends on various conditions, including legal and regulatory approvals, suggesting a likelihood of termination of the port deal [3][6]. - The transaction involves two ports at the Panama Canal, which, if acquired by the U.S., could pose significant security risks for Chinese shipping, highlighting the strategic importance of the deal [4][6]. Group 2 - The article criticizes Cheung Kong for prioritizing capital and profit over national interests, suggesting that the company is disregarding the implications of its actions on China's security and economic standing [6][8]. - The involvement of BlackRock, an American financial firm, in the transaction raises concerns about potential control over the ports and the implications for U.S.-China relations [6][10]. - The narrative stresses that businesses cannot operate independently of national interests, urging Cheung Kong to reconsider its position in light of national priorities [8][10].