（来源：新华日报） 教辅材料看似平常，背后却可能隐藏着复杂的利益链条。个别掌握推荐权、选择权的职能部门、学校领 导和教师，容易成为教辅代理商的"围猎"对象。该区纪委监委坚持问题导向，全面梳理排查在手问题线 索，严肃查处接受教材供应商吃请、利用职权谋取不正当利益等行为，做到发现一起、查处一起，坚决 铲除腐败滋生的土壤。例如，该区某高职校教辅材料征订工作负责人朱某某，违规接受教辅材料供应商 请托，组织该校15名老师参加宴请，造成不良影响。后朱某某被该区纪委监委给予党纪处分，一同参加 宴请的其他人员均受到相应处理。 为筑牢教师队伍拒腐防变思想防线，该区纪委监委推动区教育局针对性开展警示教育，组织全区中小学 教师观看警示教育片《纠风除弊 激浊扬清》，分批参观区党风廉政警示教育展，引导广大教师自觉遵 守职业道德、抵制不正风气。"片中一些反面典型是我曾经很熟悉的人，看到他们从'小问题'滑向严重 违纪违法，我深受警醒。在今后的工作中一定时刻保持清醒，严守纪法底线。"该区东山外国语学校数 学教研组负责人在参加警示教育后深有感触。 与此同时，该区纪委监委坚持标本兼治，督促区教育局出台《关于进一步规范教材教辅征订管理工作的 通知 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent changes in educational policies regarding supplementary materials in primary education, highlighting the reduction of students' academic burdens and the ongoing debate among parents and teachers about the implications of these changes [1][4][10]. Group 1: Policy Changes - The Ministry of Education launched an initiative to regulate supplementary materials in May, prohibiting the forced purchase of such materials and aiming to reduce students' academic and financial burdens [1][6]. - Various regions have implemented policies that either limit the provision of supplementary materials to one per subject or cease the unified ordering of any supplementary materials [4][10]. Group 2: Reactions from Parents and Teachers - Reactions among parents and teachers are polarized; some support the reduction of burdens, while others express concerns that it may negatively impact teaching quality [1][4]. - Some parents worry about their children’s competitiveness in exams due to the lack of supplementary materials, while others appreciate the reduction in unnecessary workload [4][5]. Group 3: Historical Context and Governance - The current governance of supplementary materials is not unprecedented; it builds on previous regulations aimed at curbing excessive fees and ensuring voluntary participation in supplementary material purchases [6][8]. - Reports indicate that there have been significant financial incentives and corruption associated with the previous unified ordering of supplementary materials, necessitating stricter governance [7][8]. Group 4: Quality Improvement Initiatives - The article emphasizes that the new policies not only aim to reduce the quantity of supplementary materials but also to enhance the quality of classroom instruction and learning resources [10][11]. - Schools are encouraged to develop their own teaching materials and optimize assignments to fill the gap left by reduced supplementary materials, promoting a more effective learning environment [10][12].

Group 1 - The article highlights the efforts of the Suqian City Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervisory Committee in addressing key issues in schools, including student dining, school uniform procurement, campus entry matters, and teaching materials [1][2][3] - The city has implemented 9 comprehensive admission items and 20 self-selection campus entry matters, resulting in an average reduction of 23.06% in school uniform prices compared to the bidding price and a 30% decrease in per-student teaching material costs each semester [1][2] - To tackle the issue of "difficult dining" for students, the Education Bureau has proposed a plan that includes an investment of over 56 million yuan for upgrading 151 school canteens, benefiting 150,000 students [1] Group 2 - The establishment of the "School Uniform Sunshine Direct Purchase Platform" aims to address issues related to funding supervision and quality discrepancies in school uniforms, leading to a procurement of 1.857867 million sets of uniforms at a total cost of 213.8 million yuan, with a compliance rate of 97.9% [2] - The Education Bureau has streamlined the approval process for campus entry matters, reducing the number of such matters by 60% and achieving a satisfaction rate of 93.38% in the year-end evaluation [2] - The focus on teaching materials has led to the implementation of regulations that clarify ordering rules, resulting in an annual reduction of approximately 120 million yuan in unnecessary expenses for families [3]