Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent changes in educational policies regarding supplementary materials in primary education, highlighting the reduction of students' academic burdens and the ongoing debate among parents and teachers about the implications of these changes [1][4][10]. Group 1: Policy Changes - The Ministry of Education launched an initiative to regulate supplementary materials in May, prohibiting the forced purchase of such materials and aiming to reduce students' academic and financial burdens [1][6]. - Various regions have implemented policies that either limit the provision of supplementary materials to one per subject or cease the unified ordering of any supplementary materials [4][10]. Group 2: Reactions from Parents and Teachers - Reactions among parents and teachers are polarized; some support the reduction of burdens, while others express concerns that it may negatively impact teaching quality [1][4]. - Some parents worry about their children’s competitiveness in exams due to the lack of supplementary materials, while others appreciate the reduction in unnecessary workload [4][5]. Group 3: Historical Context and Governance - The current governance of supplementary materials is not unprecedented; it builds on previous regulations aimed at curbing excessive fees and ensuring voluntary participation in supplementary material purchases [6][8]. - Reports indicate that there have been significant financial incentives and corruption associated with the previous unified ordering of supplementary materials, necessitating stricter governance [7][8]. Group 4: Quality Improvement Initiatives - The article emphasizes that the new policies not only aim to reduce the quantity of supplementary materials but also to enhance the quality of classroom instruction and learning resources [10][11]. - Schools are encouraged to develop their own teaching materials and optimize assignments to fill the gap left by reduced supplementary materials, promoting a more effective learning environment [10][12].

Core Viewpoint - The recent educational reforms in China aim to reduce the burden of supplementary materials on students while enhancing the quality of classroom education, as evidenced by the implementation of a negative list prohibiting the forced purchase of such materials [1][2][7]. Group 1: Changes in Supplementary Materials - The Ministry of Education's actions have led to a significant reduction in the weight of students' school bags, with many students now carrying only essential textbooks and a single supplementary book [1]. - The new policies have resulted in varied local implementations, with some schools providing only one supplementary book per subject, while others have ceased the unified purchase of supplementary materials altogether [3][5]. - Parents have expressed mixed reactions, with some supporting the reduction of supplementary materials, while others fear it may hinder their children's competitive edge in exams [3][4]. Group 2: Governance and Regulation - The current governance of supplementary materials is not a complete ban but rather a targeted approach to eliminate the profit-driven practices associated with unified purchasing [5][8]. - Historical context shows that the Ministry of Education has previously issued guidelines against the forced sale of supplementary materials, indicating a long-standing effort to regulate this area [6][8]. - Recent reports highlight the prevalence of corruption linked to the procurement of supplementary materials, with significant financial misconduct uncovered in various educational institutions [8][9]. Group 3: Quality Improvement in Education - The reforms not only aim to reduce the quantity of supplementary materials but also to enhance the quality of education by encouraging schools to develop their own teaching resources [10][12]. - Initiatives in provinces like Shanxi and Guangdong have demonstrated the potential for providing free educational materials, significantly reducing financial burdens on families [11]. - The emphasis on improving classroom teaching quality is seen as a necessary step to reduce reliance on supplementary materials, with a focus on fostering deeper student engagement and innovative teaching methods [13].