有追索权保理

Search documents
乐享课堂:企业融资如何选择保理模式?有追索权和无追索权保理的风险对比
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-06 01:20
Core Viewpoint - Factoring has become an important tool for companies to activate accounts receivable in the supply chain finance sector, with the choice between recourse and non-recourse factoring directly affecting corporate risk and funding costs [1] Group 1: Recourse Factoring - Recourse factoring is essentially a combination of financing and guarantee, where the factor has the right to demand repayment from the supplier if the receivable is not collected [2] - This type of factoring is suitable for sellers with average credit status but good buyer credit, allowing small and medium enterprises to alleviate financial pressure while leveraging the factor's expertise in receivable management [2][3] Group 2: Non-Recourse Factoring - Non-recourse factoring allows suppliers to transfer the credit risk of receivables entirely to the factor, significantly reducing the supplier's burden [3] - In this model, if the debtor defaults, the factor cannot seek repayment from the supplier, but this increases the factor's risk, leading to higher factoring costs [3][4] - Non-recourse factoring is ideal for suppliers needing quick cash flow and wanting to mitigate receivable risks, especially in volatile markets [4][5] Group 3: Decision Factors - Companies must evaluate their risk tolerance and receivable collection capabilities when choosing between recourse and non-recourse factoring [5] - Financial condition and funding needs are critical; non-recourse factoring provides quick cash flow, while recourse factoring may offer lower costs if the company is financially stable [5] - The credit status of buyers is also a key consideration; good buyer credit makes non-recourse factoring less risky, while uncertain buyer credit may favor recourse factoring to minimize supplier risk [5]