Core Points - The investigation into the bidding irregularities in Zhuxi County, Shiyan City, Hubei Province, revealed that state-owned enterprises fabricated project details to secure funding of 5 million yuan [1][2] - The local government has taken disciplinary actions against several officials involved in the scandal, including warnings and dismissals [2] - The procurement process for a mechanical equipment leasing project was found to have serious procedural violations, leading to the termination of the project [9] Group 1 - The bidding evaluation committee's member names were found to be copied from an online name database, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the procurement process [4][7] - The project in question had a total bid amount of 31.88 million yuan, with the procurement agency being Hubei Runtu Bidding Agency Co., Ltd. and the supplier being Zhuxi Chuangtu Labor Service Co., Ltd. [8] - A multi-department investigation team has been established to address the issue, including members from the finance bureau, procurement office, and discipline inspection committee [8] Group 2 - The local government has committed to conducting a thorough review and implementing a regular project supervision mechanism to prevent similar incidents in the future [2] - The investigation has not uncovered any personal benefit transfer issues, and the misappropriated funds have been returned [2] - The procurement office clarified that the announcement of procurement information was primarily the responsibility of the procuring entity or the procurement agency, not the procurement office itself [8]

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the Hubei Zhuanxi County Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau, where the government procurement evaluation committee's member names were copied from a popular online name database, has raised significant public concern and scrutiny regarding procurement practices and oversight [2][13][19]. Group 1: Incident Details - The evaluation committee for a procurement project announced on December 3, 2025, included names that matched exactly with the first five names from the "10000 Chinese Common Names" database [4][15]. - The project involved a total procurement amount of 31.88 million yuan (approximately 4.5 million USD) for mechanical equipment leasing [4][19]. - The Zhuanxi County Housing Bureau has acknowledged the issue, stating that they have terminated the procurement process and initiated an investigation with relevant departments [6][11]. Group 2: Previous Similar Incidents - A similar issue was reported in a procurement announcement from February 13, 2025, where names from the same database appeared in the evaluation committee for a different project, involving a procurement amount of 34 million yuan (approximately 4.8 million USD) [8][19]. - The repeated occurrence of names from the database in procurement announcements within the same year has led to suspicions about the legitimacy of the evaluation committee members [10][17]. Group 3: Response and Investigation - The Zhuanxi County Housing Bureau has stated that the incident is a significant oversight on their part and attributed it to errors made by the contracted procurement agency [19][20]. - A joint investigation team has been established to address the issues related to the procurement process and ensure compliance with regulations [19].

Core Viewpoint - The procurement evaluation list of the Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau of Zhuxi County, Hubei Province, has been criticized for copying names from Baidu's "10000 Chinese Common Names" database, leading to the termination of the bidding process and an investigation into the matter [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Details - The evaluation team for the mechanical equipment leasing procurement included members whose names matched the first five names from Baidu's list, raising concerns about the integrity of the procurement process [3][5]. - The procurement announcement was published on December 3, 2025, with a winning bid amount of 31.88 million yuan [1][7]. - The Zhuxi County Housing Bureau acknowledged the issue, stating that they have terminated the bidding process and initiated an investigation to address the problem [1][7]. Group 2: Previous Similar Incidents - A previous procurement announcement from February 13, 2025, also exhibited similar issues, where names from the evaluation team overlapped with those from the same Baidu list [5]. - The winning bid for the February project was 34 million yuan, and the same procurement agency was involved in both incidents [7]. Group 3: Official Response - A representative from the Zhuxi County Housing Bureau described the situation as a significant oversight, attributing it to errors made by the contracted procurement agency and a lack of proper oversight [7][8]. - The bureau has formed a joint investigation team to address the issues and ensure compliance with procurement regulations [1][7].

Core Viewpoint - The bidding process for the mechanical equipment leasing project by the Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau of Zhuxi County has been terminated due to significant errors in the evaluation process, which raised public concerns about the integrity of the procurement process [1][3][7]. Group 1: Project Overview - The project involved the leasing of mechanical equipment, with a total bid amount of 31.88 million yuan [5][8]. - The winning supplier for the project is Zhuxi Chuangtuo Labor Service Co., Ltd., located in the industrial park of Zhuxi County [5][8]. - The procurement was managed by Hubei Runyu Tendering Agency Co., Ltd. [8]. Group 2: Evaluation and Concerns - The evaluation committee for the bidding included five members, whose names coincidentally matched the first five names from a publicly available list, leading to public skepticism [3][6]. - A representative from the Zhuxi County Housing Bureau acknowledged that the errors were due to significant mistakes made by the entrusted agency during the information upload process, indicating a lack of oversight [7][8]. Group 3: Investigation and Response - An investigation has been initiated to address the issues raised, with a joint investigation team formed to handle the matter [1][7]. - The bureau's representative stated that the errors were a major oversight in their operations and regulatory processes [7].