Core Viewpoint - The merger between Haiguang Information and Zhongke Shuguang, valued at 115.97 billion yuan, has been terminated due to significant changes in market conditions and the complexity of the transaction, rather than operational or financial issues [3][11]. Group 1: Termination Reasons - The termination of the merger was primarily due to the large scale of the transaction and the involvement of multiple parties, which prolonged the evaluation process. Additionally, the market environment has changed significantly since the initial planning, making the implementation conditions immature [3][11]. - The transaction was initially announced on June 9, 2025, with Haiguang Information's share price set at 143.46 yuan and Zhongke Shuguang's at 79.26 yuan. The merger was intended to be the largest in the domestic computing industry and the largest A-share merger in 2025, valued at 115.97 billion yuan [3][11]. Group 2: Investor Communication - Following the announcement of the merger's termination, both companies will hold an investor briefing on December 10, 2025, to address questions and concerns from investors [4][12]. - A timeline of the merger process was provided, indicating that the companies had been actively disclosing progress from May 25, 2025, until the termination announcement on December 9, 2025 [4][12]. Group 3: Market Impact and Stock Performance - Since the announcement of the merger plan, both companies experienced significant stock price increases, with Haiguang Information reaching a peak of 277.98 yuan per share and Zhongke Shuguang reaching 128.12 yuan per share, both doubling in value compared to pre-suspension prices [5][13]. - The mid-term cash dividend plans were announced simultaneously with the termination, with Haiguang Information proposing a dividend of 0.9 yuan per 10 shares (totaling 209 million yuan) and Zhongke Shuguang proposing 0.7 yuan per 10 shares (totaling 102 million yuan) [4][12]. Group 4: Strategic Context - The merger was positioned to benefit from favorable policy support, being the first A-share absorption merger under the revised 2025 regulations, which allowed for a simplified review process. However, the termination was not attributed to regulatory or policy obstacles [5][13]. - The analysis suggests that the core trigger for the termination was a dramatic shift in the market ecosystem, with both companies opting for collaboration rather than a merger, reflecting a significant change in the market environment since the merger announcement [6][14].