炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 近日，红星资本局从安靠智电（300617.SZ）证券部工作人员处了解到，该公司的原董事会秘书黄节根因构成敲诈勒索罪（未 遂）被判有期徒刑7年，并处罚金10万元。 红星资本局注意到，2021年，安靠智电的股价曾触达最高点91.38元/股，但今年以来，其股价长期在50元/股以下徘徊。截至 12月26日收盘，安靠智电的总市值约为54亿元。 黄节根案二审已宣判 昔日董秘因敲诈勒索罪被判七年 公开资料显示，安靠智电（300617.SZ）从事电缆连接件系统、GIL系统、以"开变一体机"为核心的智慧模块化变电站系统及 智慧海绵光储充系统的创新研发等。 公司原董秘黄节根出生于1984年，博士研究生学历，曾任和讯信息科技有限公司投资顾问、国泰君安资深市场分析师。 据每日经济新闻报道，黄节根通过公众号"吹哨人-黄节根"以第一人称自述其在担任安靠智电董秘时，发现公司存在财务造假 行为，但他不愿配合，反被公司以敲诈勒索为由报案。 另据第一财经报道，溧阳检察院指控黄节根以安靠智电存在财务造假问题，不能保证2022年半年报内容真实、准确、完整等 相要挟，向该公司提 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute between Ankao Zhidian and its former secretary Huang Jiegen has reached a significant milestone with Huang being convicted of extortion, which he plans to appeal. The case highlights the complexities surrounding allegations of financial misconduct and the challenges of corporate governance in the Chinese market [1][2][3]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The conflict began in August 2022 when Huang questioned the authenticity of Ankao Zhidian's financial reports and refused to sign them, leading to accusations of extortion during negotiations for performance-based stock rewards [1][6][12]. - Huang's allegations of financial fraud were based on discrepancies in the company's reported profits, which he believed were inflated through premature revenue recognition [13][15][16]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Huang was arrested on July 28, 2023, during a court hearing related to his administrative lawsuit against the regulatory bodies for not investigating the alleged financial fraud [2][3]. - The court's ruling on August 11, 2023, found Huang guilty of extortion, with the sentence expected to be severe, although details remain undisclosed as he intends to appeal [1][4]. Group 3: Financial Allegations - Huang reported that Ankao Zhidian had inflated its profits by 44% in the 2021 semi-annual report and by 64.5% in the annual report, primarily through the early recognition of revenue from a project that had not yet generated actual income [15][16]. - The company’s financial performance has deteriorated significantly, with its stock price dropping by 60% since its peak in November 2021, reflecting a loss of investor confidence [24]. Group 4: Company and Industry Impact - Ankao Zhidian, which specializes in cable connection systems and gas-insulated transmission systems, has faced severe scrutiny and regulatory actions due to the allegations of financial misconduct [12][16]. - The ongoing legal battle and the company's declining stock performance have led to a significant reduction in institutional investor holdings, from 15.3% to 2.1%, indicating a loss of market trust [24].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute between the listed company Ankao Zhidian and its former secretary Huang Jiegen has reached a significant milestone, with Huang being convicted of extortion, which he plans to appeal. The case highlights the complexities of corporate governance and financial integrity within the company [1][3]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The conflict began in August 2022 when Huang Jiegen questioned the authenticity of Ankao Zhidian's financial reports and refused to sign them, leading to accusations of extortion when he sought stock rewards as per a performance agreement [1][5]. - Huang's apprehension stemmed from concerns about potential retaliation for his insistence on truthful reporting, prompting him to submit a written opinion indicating he could not guarantee the accuracy of the financial statements [8][9]. - The performance agreement stipulated that Huang would receive stock rewards contingent on the company's market value meeting specific targets over three years, alongside commitments to maintain a minimum profit growth [9][10]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct Allegations - Huang raised alarms about potential financial misconduct after noticing discrepancies in the company's profit figures across different versions of financial reports, leading him to suspect that profits were artificially inflated [17][21]. - He reported that the company had prematurely recognized revenue from a project, which he believed had not generated any actual income, resulting in significant profit inflation in the financial statements [19][21]. - Huang filed multiple complaints with the China Securities Regulatory Commission regarding the alleged financial fraud, but the regulatory response was limited, leading to dissatisfaction with the outcomes [22][23]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Outcomes - The legal proceedings have been marked by delays and conflicting narratives from both parties, with Huang portraying himself as a whistleblower while the company accused him of premeditated extortion [1][23]. - The court's ruling on Huang's conviction for extortion has raised questions about the nature of his demands, which he argues were legitimate claims for owed compensation rather than illegal extortion [5][26]. - The case reflects broader issues of corporate governance, accountability, and the protection of whistleblowers in the financial sector, with implications for investor confidence in Ankao Zhidian [27][30].