Workflow
美国比特币
icon
Search documents
暴跌90%!特朗普发的币成废纸,万亿美元蒸发,家族财富严重缩水
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-26 15:55
Core Insights - The article highlights the stark contrast between the financial losses experienced by ordinary investors in the cryptocurrency market and the financial maneuvers of the Trump family, suggesting a manipulation of market dynamics for personal gain [3][25]. Group 1: Market Dynamics and Investor Impact - The price of a cryptocurrency associated with Trump, known as "Trump Meme Coin," peaked at $75.35 but plummeted to $6.25, resulting in an average loss of 78% for retail investors [9][12]. - Many ordinary investors, including factory workers, invested their life savings and educational funds into these cryptocurrencies, only to face devastating losses [5][9]. - The broader cryptocurrency market saw a significant decline, with Bitcoin dropping from a peak of $125,000 to $80,000, contributing to a total market value loss of $1 trillion [21][23]. Group 2: Trump Family's Financial Maneuvers - The Trump family reportedly holds approximately $870 million in Bitcoin and has profited significantly from their investments, despite public claims of losses [12][27]. - The family's strategy involved creating and promoting cryptocurrencies during politically advantageous moments, allowing them to cash out before market downturns [14][16]. - The Trump family's financial gains from these ventures are contrasted with the losses suffered by retail investors, highlighting a significant conflict of interest [25][27]. Group 3: Political Implications - The article suggests that Trump's actions have eroded public trust in political institutions, as his family profited while ordinary citizens lost their investments [25][30]. - Polls indicate a decline in support among Trump's core followers due to financial losses in the cryptocurrency market, with many expressing disappointment and a loss of trust [27][30]. - The intertwining of political power and market manipulation raises concerns about the integrity of democratic processes and the potential for conflicts of interest in regulatory practices [23][25].