Workflow
辛未来投资基金
icon
Search documents
公司改名、法人变更、规模连降......知名私募上海承壹大变动后有新动作
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-23 02:46
Core Insights - Shanghai Chengyi Private Equity has experienced a significant decline in its management scale, dropping from over 10 billion yuan at the beginning of the year to a range of 2-5 billion yuan [2] - The firm has seen a high percentage of its products either liquidated or in the process of liquidation, with 40.8% of its 402 registered products falling into these categories [2] - The company has not registered any new products for over 27 months, coinciding with a regulatory warning from the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau [6][8] Company Overview - Shanghai Chengyi Private Equity was established in May 2010 and was originally named Shanghai Yiyang Investment, founded by well-known fund manager Liang Feng [2] - The company underwent significant ownership changes starting in 2015, with most shares acquired by Huaxi Co., Ltd. and its affiliates, leading to a rebranding in 2017 [2] - The firm has transitioned to a fully natural person shareholder structure after multiple changes in its shareholder composition [2][8] Product and Performance Analysis - As of 2023, 81.84% of the firm's products were established after June 2020, indicating a rapid expansion phase [4] - Despite the decline in management scale, the firm completed a significant investment in July 2023, acquiring a 5% stake in Kid King (301078.SZ) for approximately 668 million yuan [12] - The firm’s products have appeared among the top ten shareholders in eight stocks, with a total market value of 615 million yuan [13] Recent Developments - The firm has undergone several changes in its corporate structure, including a name change to Shanghai Chengyi Private Equity Fund Management Co., Ltd. and changes in key personnel [8][10] - The new legal representative, Cao Yang, has a background in various financial institutions and previously served as the chairman of a listed company [10] - The firm has faced administrative regulatory measures, which may have contributed to its halt in new product registrations [6][8]