Core Points - The Beijing Market Supervision Administration conducted a quality supervision sampling of anti-theft security doors and locks, revealing that 9 batches of anti-theft security doors were found to be non-compliant, involving companies such as Beijing Tantan Tongchuang Industrial Co., Ltd. and Jiangshan Oupai Door Industry Co., Ltd. [1][2] Group 1: Non-compliance Details - The non-compliance list includes products from various manufacturers, with issues such as failure to meet basic requirements, steel plate thickness, anti-destructive performance, and lock installation standards [1][2][3] - Specific products identified include the "Jinshangzhai" entry door from Beijing Tantan Tongchuang, which failed on multiple safety criteria including steel plate thickness and anti-destructive performance [1] - Jiangshan Oupai's "Oupai" brand security entry door was noted for using a sample that misappropriated its name and address, alongside failing to meet several safety standards [2][3] Group 2: Standards and Recommendations - The anti-destructive performance is a key safety performance indicator for anti-theft security doors, with the GB 17565-2022 standard requiring the highest level doors to withstand non-normal openings for at least 30 minutes [4][5] - Steel plate thickness is also critical, with the GB 17565-2022 standard mandating a minimum thickness of 3.0 mm for the highest level doors, which directly impacts their anti-destructive performance [4][5] - The Beijing Market Supervision Administration advises consumers to prioritize products that explicitly meet the GB 17565-2022 standard when purchasing anti-theft doors, as similar-looking products may not guarantee safety performance [5]