Workflow
Cane sugar
icon
Search documents
Corn Crash Or Sugar Rush? ETFs React To Trump's Sweet Talk On Coca-Cola
Benzinga· 2025-07-18 17:52
Core Viewpoint - President Trump's comment regarding Coca-Cola's potential switch from high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) to cane sugar has triggered significant reactions in commodity markets, particularly affecting corn refiners and related ETFs [1][2]. Group 1: Market Reactions - Coca-Cola has not officially announced any changes, but Trump's statement led to a decline in shares of corn refiners Archer-Daniels-Midland Co (ADM) and Ingredion Inc (INGR) as markets reacted to the potential decrease in HFCS demand [2]. - Archer-Daniels-Midland managed to recover some losses in subsequent trading sessions, indicating market volatility [2]. Group 2: ETF Implications - The Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) may face challenges if demand for HFCS decreases, as it offers direct exposure to corn futures [6]. - Conversely, the Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) stands to benefit from an increase in cane sugar demand, whether domestically or globally [6]. - The Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA), which holds positions in both corn and sugar, could provide a hedged investment opportunity amid the evolving sweetener market dynamics [7]. Group 3: Industry Response - The Corn Refiners Association has publicly opposed Trump's comments, warning of "massive job losses" and arguing that HFCS is crucial to the U.S. agricultural economy [8]. - They contend that replacing HFCS with imported cane sugar would undermine American competitiveness in agriculture [8]. Group 4: Future Considerations - The situation remains speculative until Coca-Cola confirms any changes, but ETF strategists should monitor future comments from major food and beverage companies, potential policy changes regarding farm subsidies or tariffs, and market volatility driven by sentiment rather than supply and demand [10].
High-fructose corn syrup vs. cane sugar in foods: The cost of switching ingredients
Fox Business· 2025-07-18 16:17
Core Viewpoint - The potential switch from high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) to cane sugar by Coca-Cola may lead to increased costs for consumers and farmers, as cane sugar is significantly more expensive to produce and process compared to HFCS [1][3][4]. Pricing Comparison - The cost of bulk high-fructose corn syrup is approximately $0.35 per pound in 2025, a slight increase from $0.27 in 2015, while refined white sugar has risen to $1.01 from $0.61 in 2015 [1]. Industry Context - Coca-Cola's historical shift from cane sugar to HFCS in the 1980s was driven by the latter's lower cost due to corn farming subsidies and high tariffs on cane sugar [3][4]. - The U.S. produces 850 billion pounds of corn annually, making it a readily available and inexpensive source for HFCS, while only three states produce 8 billion pounds of cane sugar, with additional sources facing tariffs [6]. Economic Implications - The Corn Refiners Association (CRA) warns that eliminating HFCS could reduce corn prices by up to $0.34 per bushel, resulting in a $5.1 billion revenue loss for farms [9]. - The CRA estimates that the loss of demand for corn refining products could lead to short-term losses of $13.9 billion, with annual losses reaching between $5.2 billion and $7.5 billion, adversely affecting local economies [11]. Product Strategy - Analysts suggest that Coca-Cola may introduce a new product line featuring cane sugar rather than replacing its existing corn syrup-based products [13]. - A cane sugar variant is expected to carry a premium price due to higher production costs, and achieving price parity with current products would require significant increases in U.S. cane sugar production or imports, which is unlikely in the near term [14].