Financial Performance (Q3-25) - Net revenue increased by 11% to $1.06 billion compared to $0.96 billion in Q3-24, excluding USAID and DOS [5] - Operating income increased by 37% to $159 million compared to $116 million in Q3-24, excluding USAID and DOS [5] - Earnings per share (EPS) increased by 46% to $0.41 compared to $0.28 in Q3-24, excluding USAID and DOS [5] Segment Performance (Q3-25) - CIG segment net revenue increased by 2% to $633 million [7] - GSG segment net revenue increased by 29% to $429 million [7] - CIG operating income margin increased by 230 basis points to 19.9% [7] - GSG operating income margin increased by 130 basis points to 15.2% [7] Customer Revenue (Q3-25) - U.S Federal net revenue increased by 46% [8] - U.S State & Local net revenue increased by 30% [8] - U.S Commercial net revenue decreased by 4% [8] - International net revenue decreased by 1% [8] Financial Overview (FY25 YTD) - Net revenue increased by 9% to $3.454 billion [14] - EBITDA increased by 15% to $476 million [15] - Operating income increased by 21% to $432 million [16] - Diluted EPS increased by 26% to $1.11 [16] Backlog - Q3-25 Backlog is $3.09B [10] Guidance - Q4-25 Net Revenue is expected to be between $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion [32] - Q4-25 Adjusted EPS is expected to be between $0.38 and $0.43 [32] - FY-25 Net Revenue is expected to be between $4.454 billion and $4.554 billion [32] - FY-25 Adjusted EPS is expected to be between $1.49 and $1.54 [32]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company achieved record results for revenue, net revenue, operating income, and earnings per share in the second quarter, with net revenue increasing to $1.1 billion, up $51 million year-over-year, and operating income rising to $130 million, an 11% increase from the prior year [9][10] - Earnings per share for the quarter was $0.33, reflecting an 18% increase from the previous year [10] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Government Services Group (GSG) segment saw a 12% year-over-year revenue increase to $521 million, with a margin of 13.8% [10][11] - The Commercial International Group (CIG) segment's revenue was $597 million, up approximately 2%, with a margin of 13.2% [11] - U.S. Federal client work (excluding USAID) increased by 16%, representing about 20% of total revenues, driven by disaster response activities and new programs for the Army Corps of Engineers [11][12] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - International work accounted for about 38% of revenues, with slight growth on a constant currency basis, although Australian infrastructure work saw a reduction of over 10% due to a recent election [12][13] - The company reported a backlog of $4.31 billion, which includes $220 million in ongoing work with USAID, primarily in Ukraine [13][14] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focusing on high-end data centers and water and environmental projects, which are expected to carry higher margins [16][31] - The addition of the Sage Group is expected to enhance capabilities in digital systems and automation, positioning the company for growth in these areas [34][35] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the funding streams from the U.S. Federal Government, particularly in defense-related services, and noted that the Department of Defense is expected to spend what they contract for [72][74] - The company anticipates continued strong demand for its services in water supply and environmental projects, driven by ongoing challenges such as drought and aging infrastructure [86] Other Important Information - The company announced a 12% increase in its quarterly dividend and reinstated its stock buyback program, with $150 million in stock repurchased in the second quarter [22][23] - A new credit facility of $1.5 billion was secured, providing more liquidity and favorable terms for future investments [20][39] Q&A Session All Questions and Answers Question: Concerns about federal expenditure reductions affecting state and local business - Management noted that they have not seen any near-term pressure on state and local projects, which are often funded through multi-year bonds [42][44] Question: Impact of proposed EPA deregulation on the company - Management indicated that most of their environmental work is driven by state and local regulations, and they do not foresee a direct impact from proposed federal regulations [49][52] Question: Core margin progression post-USAID cancellations - Management expects margins to grow slightly faster than the previously targeted 50 basis points annually, with a new higher baseline established [59][60] Question: Visibility and confidence from government partners for future projects - Management reported positive feedback from federal clients regarding funding commitments, particularly in defense and infrastructure projects [72][74] Question: Capital allocation preferences between share buybacks and M&A - Management stated that they have the ability to pursue both share buybacks and acquisitions simultaneously, with a focus on maintaining double-digit dividend increases [88][89] Question: Utilization rates of staff previously working with USAID - Management acknowledged a decrease in utilization rates for USAID staff but noted that overall staffing levels remained high due to disaster response projects [96]