Goldfish

Search documents
Jim Cramer Says “Campbell’s Has Been Fighting the Bears for Years”
Yahoo Finance· 2025-10-03 10:03
The Campbell’s Company (NASDAQ:CPB) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer was recently focused on. Cramer questioned the company’s yield and whether it is worth buying. He remarked: “Conagra’s not the only food stock with an outsized yield. Campbell’s has been fighting the bears for years. Talk about solid brands… Pepperidge Farm, Cape Cod… V8, all solid. Stock yields just under 5%. Kind of tempting, but why is that yield that high? I think the only way to justify buying this one is if you’re waiting for a take ...
2 Ultra-High-Yield Dividend Stocks at 10-Year Lows to Buy in July
The Motley Fool· 2025-07-09 00:05
Core Viewpoint - The significant decline in stock prices of Conagra Brands and Campbell's Company presents a potential buying opportunity for patient investors despite the challenges faced by the packaged food industry [3][20]. Industry Overview - The packaged food industry is experiencing a severe slowdown due to pullbacks in consumer spending and inflation, which have particularly impacted packaged food companies [5]. - A shift in consumer behavior towards healthier options poses a significant challenge for the industry, especially for companies focused on frozen and processed meals [6]. Company Performance - Conagra and Campbell's stocks have both dropped over 25% year to date, reaching their lowest levels in over a decade, resulting in dividend yields of 6.8% and 5.1%, respectively [1][2][16]. - Both companies have faced difficulties due to poor acquisition decisions, with Conagra's acquisition of Pinnacle Foods for $10.9 billion and Campbell's acquisition of Snyder's-Lance for $6.1 billion being particularly criticized [11][12][13]. Financial Metrics - Conagra's free cash flow (FCF) per share is $3.02, while its dividend per share is $1.40; Campbell's FCF per share is $2.41 against a dividend of $1.52, indicating that both companies can support their dividends despite weakening balance sheets [18]. - In terms of valuations, Campbell's has a price-to-FCF ratio of 12.8 and a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10.5, while Conagra has a price-to-FCF ratio of 6.8 and a forward P/E of 8.3, showing that both stocks are significantly discounted compared to their historical averages [19]. Regulatory Environment - Regulatory pressures, such as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' measures to phase out synthetic dyes, add to the challenges faced by the industry but could lead to long-term benefits [7][9]. - Conagra announced plans to remove synthetic colors from its U.S. frozen product portfolio by the end of 2025, aligning with industry trends towards healthier ingredients [8].
Campbell's Q3 Sales Edge Higher
The Motley Fool· 2025-06-04 19:24
Core Insights - Campbell's reported a 1% organic net sales growth for fiscal 2025 Q3, with adjusted EBIT increasing by 2% and adjusted EPS at $0.73, reflecting a 3% year-over-year decline, while full-year adjusted EPS is now expected at the low end of prior guidance [1] Meals and Beverages Performance - The meals and beverages segment achieved a 6% organic net sales growth and a 2% increase in consumption, marking six consecutive quarters of positive in-market consumption [2] - Strong household penetration gains in condensed cooking soups were noted, particularly among millennial consumers, with mac and cheese marketing adding approximately 1 million new households, the largest quarterly gain in four years for this subcategory [2][3] Snacks Segment Challenges - The snacks division experienced a 5% decline in organic net sales, with a 3% drop in consumption attributed to category-wide contraction and company-specific execution issues [4][5] - Recovery prospects for the snacks segment are now pushed into fiscal 2026, with management focusing on price-point strategies, multipack offerings, and targeted innovation to preserve share and margin [5] Cost Management and Acquisition Integration - The company achieved approximately $110 million in cost savings towards a $250 million multi-year target, with the SOVOS acquisition integration unlocking additional efficiencies [6][7] - Despite a 110 basis point contraction in adjusted gross profit margin, disciplined cost controls enabled a 2% adjusted EBIT gain, and acquisition synergies positively impacted adjusted EPS [6][8] Future Outlook - Management reaffirmed FY2025 guidance, now expecting adjusted EPS at the low end of the range, with meals and beverages facing shipment-related headwinds and snacks' full-year operating margin projected at 13% [8] - The FY2025 cost savings target has been raised to $130 million, and the company anticipates capital expenditures at approximately 4.5% of net sales, with tariff-related impacts on adjusted EPS estimated at $0.03–$0.05 [8]