Workflow
IB
icon
Search documents
教培收费不超五千形同虚设 高额国际课程归谁监管?
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2026-02-10 01:36
Core Viewpoint - The international education and study abroad institutions are facing significant challenges, including closures and high tuition fees, which are not compliant with local regulations regarding prepayment limits [1][2]. Group 1: High Tuition Fees - International education training packages often exceed the regulatory limit of 5,000 yuan for single payments, with many institutions charging over 100 class hours and total fees far exceeding this amount [2][5]. - The Guangzhou Education Bureau has repeatedly warned parents against making large prepayments to off-campus training institutions, emphasizing that payments should not exceed 5,000 yuan at once [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Compliance - The Ministry of Education's notification on regulating prepayment for off-campus training institutions aims to prevent issues like "difficult refunds" and "running away with money," mandating that no single payment should cover more than three months or 60 class hours [1][3]. - Despite these regulations, many international education institutions continue to operate outside these guidelines, raising questions about the enforcement of such rules [2][5]. Group 3: Classification of Training - There is ambiguity regarding whether international education courses fall under "subject classes" as defined by the Ministry of Education, as they often include subjects like mathematics and foreign languages but do not adhere to national curriculum standards [4][6]. - The classification of international education training as either subject or non-subject training remains unclear, complicating regulatory oversight [6][7]. Group 4: Regulatory Oversight Challenges - The regulatory framework for international education institutions is fragmented, with responsibilities spread across various departments, making it difficult to enforce compliance effectively [5][6]. - The lack of clear jurisdiction over international education institutions means that issues related to pricing and consumer protection may not be adequately addressed by educational authorities [5][6].