收缩了绝大部分理财投入 OKX 的 $BTC 双币赢主要基于两点基础原因：1. 我认为 80k - 100k 这个区间的 BTC 值得长期定投，哪怕接到货我也不会卖，整体是因为还没研究明白期权工具才去用下简易期权2. OKX 本身安全，不会跑路，观察下来同类型双币赢产品里他们提供的利润最高（也就是扣除的实际手续费最少）有时候会问自己一个问题，BTC 再跌到 75k 会梭哈吗？我的答案是不会。新人这轮进来的都是靠什么赚钱的？大多是土狗 meme 和链上协议。我既然没有在 BTC 赚过大钱，那我凭什么要在极度恐慌的情况下对 BTC 有什么信仰呢？对我们来说买 BTC 也是一种投机罢了，还是一种信仰不坚定的投机在认知到这一点的基础上，购买一些不影响生活的仓位是有必要的。考虑到的就是更长线的操作，只有仓位较小的情况下做这样的操作才不会等更恐慌的时候割肉。震荡市吃吃权利金也够生活了另外 OKX 最近的闪赚也是提供了比较大容量的猪脚饭，在活期理财只有 2% 的情况下还是挺舒服的Mercy (@Mercy_okx):最新一期OKX闪赚活动今晚8点上线啦！千呼万唤的BTC奖池回来咯～📅活动时间：2025年11月18日下午8: ...

$MET is now live on Flash Earn!Subscribe with OKB or USDT and claim your rewards instantly, right from the app 📲 https://t.co/g4APqcK3dG ...

Core Insights - Paxos, a stablecoin issuer, minted 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins, which are pegged to the US dollar at a 1:1 ratio, and subsequently destroyed them due to an internal error [2][4] - The issuance of such a large amount of stablecoins raises concerns about the lack of regulation and potential risks in the cryptocurrency market [4][5] - The incident highlights the ease with which stablecoins can be created and the implications for larger stablecoins like USDT and USDC [5][8] Group 1: Stablecoin Issuance and Market Impact - Paxos minted 300 trillion PYUSD, equivalent to approximately 2130 trillion RMB, and later sent all tokens to an inaccessible wallet for destruction [2] - The total value of the minted tokens exceeds twice the GDP of all countries combined, raising questions about the implications of such a large issuance [4] - The incident reflects a broader issue in the stablecoin market, where significant amounts can be created without regulatory oversight [4][5] Group 2: Historical Context and Risks - Similar incidents have occurred in the past, such as OKX sending over 65 million OKB to an inaccessible address and the Bonk project destroying 1.7 trillion BONK tokens [5] - The ease of creating stablecoins without proper checks poses risks, especially for larger stablecoins like USDT and USDC [5][8] - The volatility and lack of stability in the stablecoin market raise concerns about the potential for significant financial losses for investors [7][9] Group 3: Blockchain Technology and Market Dynamics - Blockchain technology significantly reduces transaction costs and time in cross-border trade compared to traditional banking systems [12] - Emerging markets are increasingly adopting stablecoins, with usage rates in countries like Argentina and Turkey reaching 25%-30%, surpassing the global average [14] - The transaction volume of stablecoins in cross-border payments is projected to exceed that of traditional payment systems like Visa and Mastercard by 2024 [14][15]

Core Insights - A significant operational error led to the unprecedented minting and subsequent destruction of 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins, surpassing the total GDP of all countries combined [1][5][6] - The incident prompted Aave to temporarily freeze PYUSD trading due to the unexpected high-volume transaction [1][3] - Paxos attributed the error to an internal technical mistake, assuring that customer funds remain secure and the issue has been resolved [1][5] Market Impact - Following the incident, PYUSD maintained its dollar peg, with only a brief price drop of approximately 0.5% [3] - The current market capitalization of PYUSD exceeds $2.3 billion, ranking it sixth among stablecoins [5] Historical Context - This event marks the largest token destruction in cryptocurrency history, dwarfing previous incidents such as the 65 million OKB tokens sent to an inaccessible address by OKX [6] - Comparatively, the Bonk meme coin project destroyed about 1.7 trillion BONK tokens in December 2024, valued at around $50 million, highlighting the unprecedented scale of the PYUSD incident [7] Regulatory and Mechanism Concerns - The incident raised critical questions regarding the collateralization mechanisms of stablecoins, with concerns about what backed the erroneously minted $300 trillion [8]

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Paxos, which resulted in the minting and subsequent destruction of 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins, highlights a significant operational error in the cryptocurrency market, leading to the largest token destruction in history [1][10]. Group 1: Incident Details - On October 15, Paxos minted 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins, which are pegged to the US dollar at a 1:1 ratio, and then sent all of them to an inaccessible wallet for destruction within 22 minutes [2][4]. - The total value of the destroyed tokens is approximately 300 trillion USD, exceeding the combined GDP of all countries globally by more than double, according to IMF data [3][4]. Group 2: Market Impact - Following the incident, the decentralized lending protocol Aave temporarily froze PYUSD trading due to the unexpected high-volume transaction [4]. - Despite the incident, PYUSD maintained its dollar peg, with only a brief price drop of about 0.5% [6]. Group 3: Market Position - Currently, PYUSD has a market capitalization exceeding 2.3 billion USD, ranking sixth in the stablecoin market, behind Tether's USDt, USDC, Ethena USDe, Dai, and World Liberty Financial USD [8]. Group 4: Historical Context - This event set a record for the largest token destruction in cryptocurrency history, surpassing previous significant destruction events, such as OKX sending over 65 million OKB to an inaccessible address and the Bonk meme coin project destroying approximately 1.7 trillion BONK [11].

Core Insights - A significant operational error by Paxos led to the minting of 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins, which were subsequently sent to an inaccessible wallet for destruction, marking an unprecedented event in the cryptocurrency market [1][2][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On October 15, Paxos mistakenly minted 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins, which is equivalent to approximately 300 trillion USD based on its dollar peg [1][2]. - This amount exceeds twice the total GDP of all countries globally, according to the International Monetary Fund [2]. - The incident is described as a typical "fat finger" mistake, highlighting the potential for human error in digital asset management [9]. Group 2: Market Reaction - Following the incident, Aave's founder announced a temporary freeze on PYUSD trading due to the unexpected high-volume transaction [3]. - Despite the massive minting error, PYUSD maintained its dollar peg, with only a brief price drop of about 0.5% [6]. Group 3: Company Response - Paxos stated that the excessive minting was due to an internal technical error during a transfer process and confirmed that customer funds remain secure [4]. - The company has addressed the root cause of the error, ensuring that such incidents do not recur [4]. Group 4: Market Position - Currently, PYUSD has a market capitalization exceeding 2.3 billion USD, ranking sixth among stablecoins, following Tether's USDt, USDC, Ethena USDe, Dai, and World Liberty Financial USD [8]. Group 5: Implications and Concerns - The incident raised critical questions regarding the collateral mechanisms of stablecoins, with concerns about what backed the erroneously minted 300 trillion USD [14][15].

Core Insights - A significant operational error led to the unprecedented minting and subsequent destruction of 300 trillion PYUSD stablecoins by Paxos, exceeding the total GDP of all countries combined [1][6] - Following the incident, Aave temporarily froze PYUSD trading due to the unexpected high-volume transaction [1] - Paxos confirmed that the excessive minting was a technical error during an internal transfer, ensuring customer funds remained secure [1][5] Group 1 - The incident resulted in the largest token destruction in cryptocurrency history, surpassing previous notable events [6] - PYUSD maintained its dollar peg, with only a brief price drop of approximately 0.5% post-incident [3] - The current market capitalization of PYUSD exceeds $2.3 billion, ranking it sixth among stablecoins [5] Group 2 - The event raised critical questions regarding the collateral mechanisms of stablecoins [8] - Concerns were expressed about what collateral backed the erroneously minted $300 trillion stablecoins [9]

我这两天和朋友聊的时候，问过一个问题：如果当初 CZ 杀死 FTX 的时候，你是币安交易所的股权大户，你会觉得 CZ 做得对吗？答案是不会。有些人可能觉得是为了立场为了正义，其实不是。朋友 @LeotheHorseman 回答了我一个非常关键的因素，那就是币安的股权大户往往可能持有不止一家的份额，甚至可能也有 FTX 的。从当时的角度来说，Sam 走了之后加密迎来的是打压，影响了加密整体的蛋糕全局观角度来考虑，尤其 币安 和 OKX 都是华人，本质上来说黄皮肤的华人都是一个整体，我想实际持股两家交易所的股东也有不少重合，同时持有 $BNB $OKB 的散户更多。无论 Star 对币安有多大的情绪，币安对 Star 的 FUD 有多少情绪，加密世界里华人这个群体终究是个整体这两天双方的隔空斗法倒是让我感受到这些亿万富豪确实也都是人，不止我这种小散户有情绪，是人都有情绪，有情绪上头才会有这些毫无结果的吵架 😂从散户角度来说我们看到的是美国和中国吵架带来政策不确定性和宏观不确定性，币安和 OKX 吵架带来市场的情绪进一步变差。希望市场变好，世界和平 ...

昨晚行情在OKX的操作就是买入了 $OKB$OKB 现在被赋能了很多稳定收益活动，持有OKB满满的幸福感现在看大家都在说OKX很丝滑，想了一下确实，当时根本没任何卡顿，OKX还是跟往常一样操作顺滑，没受到任何影响“最有安全感的，不是涨，是永远的稳。” https://t.co/BTkmE600pOMia米粒儿🩵 (@mia_okx):市场波动不断，但系统稳定才是平台的真正底气极端行情下，OKX 在全球范围内保持高效运行，交易一切如常～“最有安全感的，不是涨，是永远的稳。”这很OK！🫡 ...

这次黑天鹅事件中OKX交易相当丝滑没有一丝卡顿抄了一点okb ，舒服了Star (@star_okx):在今天的市场波动中，OKX 全球风控系统运行稳定，平台在各地区保持顺畅与平稳，所有系统指标均处于正常水位。OKX 将继续 7×24 小时为全球用户提供稳定可靠的服务。🌍💪 ...