Investors looking for stocks in the Building Products - Miscellaneous sector might want to consider either United Rentals (URI) or Armstrong World Industries (AWI) . But which of these two stocks is more attractive to value investors? We'll need to take a closer look to find out.We have found that the best way to discover great value opportunities is to pair a strong Zacks Rank with a great grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system. The Zacks Rank is a proven strategy that targets companies wit ...

Investors with an interest in Retail - Apparel and Shoes stocks have likely encountered both Urban Outfitters (URBN) and Boot Barn (BOOT) . But which of these two stocks offers value investors a better bang for their buck right now? We'll need to take a closer look.Everyone has their own methods for finding great value opportunities, but our model includes pairing an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system with a strong Zacks Rank. The proven Zacks Rank puts an emphasis on earnings ...

Core Viewpoint - The article compares Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) and UMB Financial (UMBF) to determine which stock is more attractive to value investors [1] Valuation Metrics - ASB has a forward P/E ratio of 10.37, while UMBF has a forward P/E of 11.83 [5] - ASB's PEG ratio is 1.13, compared to UMBF's PEG ratio of 1.29, indicating ASB may offer better value considering expected earnings growth [5] - ASB's P/B ratio is 0.95, while UMBF's P/B ratio is 1.26, suggesting ASB is undervalued relative to its book value [6] Earnings Outlook - ASB is currently experiencing an improving earnings outlook, which enhances its attractiveness in the Zacks Rank model [7] - ASB holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while UMBF has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision for ASB [3]

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Haverty Furniture (HVT) and Williams-Sonoma (WSM) indicates that HVT may offer better value for investors at this time due to its stronger earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics [1][3]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - HVT has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while WSM has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting that HVT has a stronger improvement in its earnings outlook compared to WSM [3]. - The Zacks Rank emphasizes earnings estimates and revisions, which are critical for value investors [2]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - HVT has a forward P/E ratio of 15.65, significantly lower than WSM's forward P/E of 19.15, indicating that HVT may be undervalued relative to WSM [5]. - HVT's PEG ratio is 1.30, while WSM's PEG ratio is 2.64, further suggesting that HVT is more attractive in terms of expected earnings growth [5]. - HVT's P/B ratio is 1.08, compared to WSM's P/B of 9.3, highlighting HVT's better valuation in terms of market value versus book value [6]. Group 3: Value Grades - HVT has earned a Value grade of A, while WSM has a Value grade of C, reinforcing the notion that HVT is the superior choice for value investors at this time [6].

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Ingredion (INGR) and Celsius Holdings Inc. (CELH) indicates that Ingredion presents a better value opportunity for investors at this time [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - Ingredion has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while Celsius Holdings Inc. has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - Ingredion is likely to have seen a stronger improvement in its earnings outlook compared to Celsius Holdings Inc. recently [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - Ingredion has a forward P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas Celsius Holdings Inc. has a forward P/E of 57.15 [5]. - The PEG ratio for Ingredion is 1.09, while Celsius Holdings Inc. has a PEG ratio of 1.67 [5]. - Ingredion's P/B ratio is 2.18, in contrast to Celsius Holdings Inc.'s P/B of 26.98 [6]. Group 3: Value Grades - Based on various valuation metrics, Ingredion holds a Value grade of A, while Celsius Holdings Inc. has a Value grade of D [6]. - The solid earnings outlook for Ingredion further supports its position as the superior value option compared to Celsius Holdings Inc. [6].

Core Insights - Investors are considering Alpine Income (PINE) and EastGroup Properties (EGP) for potential value opportunities in the REIT and Equity Trust - Other sector [1] Valuation Metrics - Alpine Income has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while EastGroup Properties has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - PINE has a forward P/E ratio of 8.47, significantly lower than EGP's forward P/E of 18.81 [5] - The PEG ratio for PINE is 1.41, while EGP's PEG ratio is 3.70, suggesting PINE is more favorably valued in terms of expected EPS growth [5] - PINE's P/B ratio is 0.8, compared to EGP's P/B of 2.63, indicating PINE is undervalued relative to its book value [6] - Based on these metrics, PINE has a Value grade of B, while EGP has a Value grade of F, highlighting PINE's superior valuation [6] Conclusion - PINE is positioned as the better value option due to its solid earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics compared to EGP [7]

Core Insights - The article compares Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) and Entegris (ENTG) to determine which stock offers better value for investors [1][3]. Valuation Metrics - UCTT has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while ENTG has a Zacks Rank of 5 (Strong Sell) [3]. - UCTT's forward P/E ratio is 22.85, compared to ENTG's 28.64, suggesting UCTT is more attractively priced [5]. - UCTT has a PEG ratio of 0.65, indicating better value relative to its expected earnings growth, while ENTG's PEG ratio is 1.87 [5]. - UCTT's P/B ratio is 1.09, significantly lower than ENTG's P/B ratio of 3.38, further highlighting UCTT's relative undervaluation [6]. - Based on these metrics, UCTT holds a Value grade of B, while ENTG has a Value grade of F, making UCTT the preferred choice for value investors [6].

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Mining - Gold sector should consider Kinross Gold (KGC) and Royal Gold (RGLD) for potential value opportunities, with KGC currently presenting a more favorable investment case [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - Kinross Gold has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings estimate revision trend, while Royal Gold has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The improving earnings outlook for KGC suggests it may be a more attractive option for value investors compared to RGLD [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - KGC has a forward P/E ratio of 13.37, significantly lower than RGLD's forward P/E of 24.17, indicating KGC may be undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for KGC is 0.63, while RGLD's PEG ratio is 1.27, further suggesting KGC's better valuation relative to its expected earnings growth [5]. - KGC's P/B ratio is 2.57 compared to RGLD's 3.62, reinforcing KGC's position as a more attractive investment based on traditional valuation metrics [6]. Group 3: Value Grades - KGC has earned a Value grade of A, while RGLD has a Value grade of D, highlighting KGC's superior valuation profile [6]. - The combination of Zacks Rank and Style Scores indicates that KGC stands out as the better option for value investors at this time [6].

Core Insights - The article compares Flex (FLEX) and Garmin (GRMN) to determine which stock is more attractive to value investors [1] Group 1: Zacks Rank and Valuation Metrics - FLEX has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision trend compared to Garmin, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - Value investors consider various valuation metrics to assess if a company is undervalued, including P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share [4] Group 2: Valuation Comparisons - FLEX has a forward P/E ratio of 15.61, while Garmin's forward P/E is significantly higher at 24.75 [5] - FLEX's PEG ratio is 1.50, indicating a better valuation relative to its expected earnings growth compared to Garmin's PEG ratio of 2.22 [5] - FLEX's P/B ratio stands at 3.47, compared to Garmin's P/B ratio of 4.66, further suggesting FLEX is more attractively valued [6] Group 3: Overall Value Assessment - Based on the discussed metrics, FLEX holds a Value grade of A, while Garmin has a Value grade of C, making FLEX the more appealing option for value investors [6]

Core Insights - The article compares TripAdvisor (TRIP) and Chewy (CHWY) to determine which stock is a better option for value investors [1] Valuation Metrics - TripAdvisor has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while Chewy has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - TRIP's forward P/E ratio is 23.29, significantly lower than CHWY's forward P/E of 91.45, suggesting TRIP is more undervalued [5] - The PEG ratio for TRIP is 2.33, compared to CHWY's PEG ratio of 9.67, indicating TRIP's expected earnings growth is more favorable [5] - TRIP's P/B ratio is 2.93, while CHWY's P/B ratio is 45.89, further highlighting TRIP's relative undervaluation [6] Value Grades - Based on various valuation metrics, TRIP holds a Value grade of B, whereas CHWY has a Value grade of D, suggesting TRIP is the superior option for value investors [6][7]