Workflow
Ruby on Rails
icon
Search documents
对话 Ruby on Rails 之父:发自内心恨透 Copilot,手凿代码才是程序员的乐趣
AI科技大本营· 2025-07-14 06:36
Core Viewpoint - David Heinemeier Hansson (DHH) emphasizes a philosophy of sustainable business without venture capital, advocating for a focus on programmer happiness and the importance of direct engagement with coding, while expressing concerns about AI's impact on programming skills [3][26][20]. Group 1: Programming Philosophy - DHH's initial struggles with programming were due to a lack of understanding of variables, which he later overcame through PHP and ultimately found joy in Ruby, which he describes as tailored to human thought [6][10][11]. - He believes that Ruby's dynamic typing fosters creativity and fluidity in coding, contrasting it with static typing languages that he views as limiting and bureaucratic [14][15][16]. - DHH argues against the microservices architecture, advocating for "The Majestic Monolith" as a simpler, more efficient approach for small teams [17][18]. Group 2: AI and Programming Tools - DHH expresses a strong aversion to AI programming assistants like GitHub Copilot, feeling they detract from the creative process and lead to a loss of core programming skills [20][21]. - He acknowledges that while AI can serve as a learning tool, it should not replace the deep engagement required in programming [23][25]. Group 3: Business Philosophy - DHH advises against taking venture capital, arguing that it imposes pressure for rapid growth and compromises the integrity of a business [26][27]. - He promotes a model of profitability from day one, emphasizing the importance of independence and customer service over investor demands [27][29]. - DHH's confrontation with Apple over App Store policies exemplifies his commitment to principles over profit, showcasing the power of small companies to challenge larger entities [29][30][31]. Group 4: Open Source and Community - DHH firmly believes in the purity of open source, rejecting any notion of transactional relationships in sharing software, which he views as detrimental to the open source ethos [32][34]. - He perceives criticism and "haters" as a natural consequence of creating valuable work, indicating that strong opinions often reflect the impact of one's contributions [35]. Group 5: Advice for New Programmers - DHH encourages aspiring programmers to pursue their passions and solve personal problems, rather than following trends, to maintain motivation and foster learning [36]. - He stresses the importance of enjoying the programming journey and the satisfaction that comes from problem-solving [37].
公司Rust团队全员被裁,只因把服务写得「太稳定」:“项目0故障、0报警,那养着3个Rust工程师没用啊”
猿大侠· 2025-06-02 04:22
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the paradox of a successful Rust project leading to its eventual abandonment within a company due to management changes and a lack of understanding of its value [2][12][15]. Group 1: Project Background and Development - The project took place in a rapidly growing unicorn startup that primarily used Ruby on Rails and Node.js, with no initial use of high-performance languages like Rust or Go [3]. - The team decided to develop a real-time service to support 100,000 concurrent users, leading to a comparison of different programming languages including Rust, Elixir, Ruby, and Node.js [4][10]. - Rust was ultimately chosen for its flexibility and performance, despite initial bugs, and the team completed the MVP in just two weeks [8][9][10]. Group 2: Performance and Stability - The Rust version outperformed others in speed and memory usage, successfully supporting 100,000 concurrent users without issues [10][11]. - After a month of stable operation, the service was put into maintenance mode as company strategy shifted, leading to the disbanding of the Rust development team [12][13]. Group 3: Management Changes and Consequences - A new management team, unsatisfied with the perceived lack of activity from the Rust service, decided to phase out Rust in favor of more familiar technologies like Ruby and Node.js [13][14]. - The decision resulted in the departure of three experienced Rust engineers, which was seen as a missed opportunity for the company to leverage Rust's capabilities further [15]. - Ultimately, the management's decision to rewrite the Rust service in Node.js led to complications and performance issues, highlighting the challenges of maintaining high concurrency with Node.js [16][17]. Group 4: Industry Insights and Reactions - The article sparked discussions among developers who shared similar experiences of successful projects being undervalued or abandoned due to management decisions [17][18]. - Many industry professionals noted that such occurrences are common in companies as they grow and management changes, often stifling innovation [18].