Historical Context - The origin of DAO can be traced back to the birth of Bitcoin, which operates autonomously through a distributed consensus mechanism and code rules, regarded as the "first autonomous organization" [3] - The emergence of the Ethereum platform in 2016 provided the technical foundation for DAO, with The DAO project creating a venture capital platform using smart contracts, although it faced a hack leading to a fork, validating the concept of "code is law" [3] - DAO has expanded from the financial sector to diverse fields such as art, charity, and research, leading to the trend of "everything can be a DAO" [3] - With the explosion of DeFi and NFTs in 2021, DAO is predicted to become a core governance tool in the Web3 ecosystem [3] Core Concepts - Decentralized architecture allows for power distribution, with token holders participating in decision-making through voting, and governance rules executed automatically by smart contracts, eliminating single points of control [4] - Token economic models serve as both value carriers and governance rights, where the amount of tokens held determines voting weight, incentivizing community engagement and creating a "stakeholder binding" mechanism [4] - Transparency and autonomy are ensured as all proposals, votes, and fund flows are recorded on-chain, providing traceability, while smart contracts reduce trust costs and corruption risks [4] - Programmable governance allows for rules to be iteratively upgraded through code, adapting to dynamic market environments, exemplified by protocol DAOs like Uniswap adjusting parameters via community voting [4] Differences from Traditional Organizations - Power structure in traditional organizations relies on centralized authority, whereas DAO employs token democracy for distributed governance [7] - Trust mechanisms in traditional organizations are based on legal contracts and interpersonal relationships, while DAO establishes "technical trust" through immutable smart contracts [7] - Collaboration in traditional organizations is limited by geography and hierarchy, while DAO enables global collaboration [7] - Flexibility in traditional organizations requires lengthy processes for change, whereas DAO can quickly respond to market changes through on-chain voting [7] Industry Practices - The Messiah Exchange utilizes a DAO governance structure where users vote on core strategies like trading pair listings and fee distributions, ensuring decision transparency and efficient execution through a "on-chain proposal + smart execution" mechanism [8] - The Akashi public chain provides modular tools to simplify DAO deployment, with cross-chain protocols and RWA (real-world asset tokenization) capabilities enabling DAO expansion into governance of physical assets, such as crowdfunding and distribution for renewable energy projects [8] Future Outlook - Despite challenges in governance efficiency and legal compliance, DAO's technical characteristics are reshaping industry collaboration paradigms [10] - DAO is expected to become the "organizational infrastructure" of the Web3 ecosystem, driving decentralization in finance, social, and cultural sectors [10] - Traditional enterprises may also adopt DAO principles to create "hybrid governance" models, balancing efficiency and democracy [10] - The evolution of DAO reflects the profound impact of blockchain technology on organizational forms, indicating a silent revolution in power distribution and collaboration models within the future business landscape [10]